The false publication by a newspaper that the NDC will reverse free SHS is most laughable, false and diversionary.
The Office of HE John Dramani Mahama has taken note of
a false publication by two Government sponsored tabloids, Daily Guide and Statesman that the former President of the Republic of Ghana has contracted a magazine, the AfricaWatch to publish what it says are damaging reports about the Free SHS policy.
Not exact matches
An Arsenal statement is similarly dismissive saying: «Arsenal Football Club is extremely disappointed
by the
publication of these
false claims which are without foundation.
«The
publication by a section of the press stating the contrary is fabricated,
false in its entirety, malicious and calculated to mislead the public.
A High Court sitting in Kaduna, Thursday in Kaduna, granted stringent bail conditions to a former Bureau Chief with Vanguard Newspapers, Mr. Luka Binniyat, who is standing trial over alleged
false publication brought against him
by the Kaduna State government.
The statement said the
publication was an attempt
by the government «to use
false and malicious
publications to bring the name of the former President into disrepute.»
Despite what Joe Bast and Heartland comms director Jim Lakely claim, their
false report is not peer - reviewed, a formal process conducted
by editors at actual scientific journals have other qualified scientists rigorously review and critique submitted work if it is to be approved for
publication.
So, this claim of being «natural» isn't totally
false, but it is definitely misleading, as this article
by Harvard Health
Publications also says.
Irrespective of any measures taken
by us to ensure the information featured on this site is accurate at the time of
publication, we disclaim and will be exempt from liability in respect of anything misleading,
false, incomplete or inaccurate and any errors, incorrect description and all associated disappointment, loss, expense, damage, inconvenience, delay, death, shock, illness or injury, however caused.
5)
False premises are routinely thrown around as facts, i.e. that skeptics engage in death threats (although this is little more than an allegation
by one climate scientist under investigation at the time) with no legal action taken to support it or any
publication of emails etc..
Despite what Joe Bast and Heartland comms director Jim Lakely claim, their
false report is not peer - reviewed, a formal process conducted
by editors at actual scientific journals have other qualified scientists rigorously review and critique submitted work if it is to be approved for
publication.
I am surprised that no one has noticed that the UN's IPCC used that trick in
publications by applying or condoning the use of a
false zero line for their estimate of normal and anomalous atmospheric temperatures.
Most recently, Greenpeace exposed deniers for hire in academia
by posing as fossil fuel representatives willing to pay for
publications promoting
false benefits of fossil fuel production.
Furthermore, in the year following Moment of Earth's
publication, the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) devoted two reports, totaling more than 180 pages, to debunking and correcting the numerous
false claims advanced
by Easterbrook in the book (here and here).
What is controversial is the extent to which claimants can now circumvent the rule in Bonnard v Perryman [1891] 2 Ch 269 —
by which interim injunctions in defamation are difficult to obtain — and restrain
publication of information which is defamatory and private, whether true or
false,
by framing their claim as misuse of private information.