Ill - informed and, with all due respect, blatantly
false statements like the above beg for a response based on actual facts about the present reality and near - future potential of solar and wind energy — not only in industrialized countries like Germany, Japan, Australia, and the USA, but in particular to meet the needs of the developing world, where these technologies are already enabling a revolution in rural electrification.
She is «saddened and quite honestly scared that the important work we're doing will be stifled and hidden behind
false statements like «community.
Not exact matches
Like slander, libel refers to making a
false statement that is harmful to a person's reputation.
You will often find such
false statements issued by analysts and economists that graduated from, or are employed by «elite» top - shelf schools,
like Ben Bernanke and Paul Krugman, both of Princeton University.
Sounds
like starting off with your own theology and supporting it with those passages you
like, then effectively whiting out the other passages by saying they were deluded there and were making
false statements.
It upsets me when these writers
like Mr. Burke make
statements that are both
false and misleading.
Now I don't know too much about this Muzzi Ozcan guy but he seems
like a freelancer slash intermediator so that would make alot of sense if this isn't a troll or a
statement based on
false information.
There were many other instances he had «abandoned me» in not helping me with stuff (I dealt with it and would bring it up), but he gave me a
false sense of love where he would say things
like «when something is important, I will do what needs to be done», his failure to live up to that
statement was an overwhelming feeling of lies and betrayal.
Given that the courts and government don't necessarily have a superior ability to sort of the truth of
statements like these, these kinds of
statements are given special protections from legal liability for being
false.
Another big
statement that will prove to be
false,
like so many of your
statements.
So many people believe that wearing colour makes you appear fuller and highlights those areas you
like least — this is a true and
false statement.
Simple
statements about school, subjects,
likes and dislikes for pupils to read and say true or
false, and correct.
She can say whatever see wants and I'd
like to see what the
false statement was exactly, because even though the review might have been harsh, what I saw wasn't directed at the author.
Dear Wayne: Your recital of
statements supposedly made to you by the people of Burma — «we'd
like people to tell our stories» — shows a pitiful acceptance of the
false stories spread by the military thugs who rule that country... Your claim that «not all the hotels are in the thrall of the military dictators» is absurd; every penny you spend in Burma supports the regime.
But first, nothing so far has been «thrashed» or «debunked» in that article, starting form completely
false statement (and non-sequitur argument)
like:
you said: «Conclusion, the
statement that a thing is not true if we can not prove it is shown
false» of course, i never said anything
like that.
I think your
statement that someone
like me is religious means you endorse a
false and irrational philosophical position
like the following which you share with richardscourtney:
In a defamation case, you must show that the defendant intentionally communicated a
false statement about you to a third person and as a result of the
statement, you are exposed a many things
like public hatred, shame, obloquy, contumely, odium, contempt, ridicule, aversion, ostracism, degradation, or disgrace.
In the U.S., it is merely necessary to show in a case
like this one (because it involves a matter of public concern) that the
statements were made with knowledge that they were
false, or with reckless disregard to the truth or falsity of the
statements made.
I know «untrue factual» sounds
like an oxymoron but the idea is they have to be untrue
statements about things that are objectively true or
false («X is a serial killer» X is either objectively a serial killer or they are not) not things which are not objectively true or
false («X is not a nice person» there is no objective standard by which X's «niceness» can be measured - this is an opinion).