Sentences with phrase «false theories on»

Not exact matches

Trump seized on the indictment to call for an end to «outlandish partisan attacks, wild and false allegations, and far - fetched theories» about the election, asserting they «only serve to further the agendas of bad actors, like Russia, and do nothing to protect the principles of our institutions.»

Making a judgement about a faith, be it Christianity or Islam, on the basis of a few extremists has about the same logical errancy as saying evolution is false because Hitler's murderous race purification rampage was fueled by his study of Darwin's theory, a truth written by Hitler himself.

When virtually every expert in the field agrees that the Theory is a fact, arguing that because the details aren't all agreed on the theory is false is silly and requires enormous hTheory is a fact, arguing that because the details aren't all agreed on the theory is false is silly and requires enormous htheory is false is silly and requires enormous hubris.

Allow this center in a man to remain dulled by the crowd; allow it to continue dissipated by busyness; permit it to go on evading its function by a round of distractions, or to lull itself by a carefully chosen rotation of pleasures; abandon it to its attempt to drug, to narcotize suffering and remorse which might reveal to it its true condition; let it wither away the sense of its own validity by false theories of man's nature, of his place in the social pattern, of his way of salvation; in short, allow any of these well - known forms of domestication of man's responsible core as an individual, to continue unchallenged, and you as a thinker and a friend of men have committed the supreme treason!

On the other hand, those components of creationism which involve certain types of magical events (e.g., the divine creation of a young universe with all of its components bearing the false imprint of great age) make the claims of creationism untestable — making creationism not a theory at all, because theories must be testable!

The basic distinction that is pressed in all of these attempts to separate «true» from «false» liberation is that the former is based on gospel values, while the latter is overly dependent on Karl Marx and a Marxist analysis of the world, especially in relation to Marx's theory of class struggle.

He based his theory of motion on false premises, and so the results are absurdly wrong.

Perhaps the skeptical and revisionist spirit of post-structural critical theory, which in its own terms rejects the disjunction of science and literature as false, will ultimately have the effect of reconciling the two on the quite different terms of a common faith in common fathers.

The idea that both creationism and evolution are on a par starting with a theory is completely false.

They praise ancient Greek and Arabic sciences as successful on their own terms but have lost sight of the fact that the theories advanced by early science were largely false.

This false dichotomy can wreak havoc on young Christians raised to believe they have to choose between God and evolution, and who after encountering evidence in support of the theory, abandon faith altogether.

There is still time for Corbyn's supporters to pull back from the edge, reject the seductive embrace of false consciousness paranoia and conspiracy theory, and focus on changing the minds of real people in the country at large.

This little fact destroys omnivore theory based on superstitious false belief that animal protein (meat) makes us smarter.

Whether they are true or false, economic theories and all assessments based on these (such as PISA) determine reality.

Performance: «Cally Spooner: A Lecture on False Tears and Outsourcing» at the New Museum I have a «double negative» theory about this event: two traditionally snoozy formats (lectures and performances) will come together to make one very interesting event.

The hockey stick is one attempt at doing so because it provides a very visual impression of what is happening, but this in turn means a lot of people get the false impression that it is some kind of cornerstone that the whole of global warming theory is built on.

As I've said on several occasions here and elsewhere, the major problem with global warming believers» enslavement to the «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact» phrase is that it is not in any way proof of an arrangement between between skeptics and industry officials involving payments made for false climate assessments.

These false assumptions were caused when CARB deliberately embraced the unproven indirect land use theory, which is not supported by the facts on the ground.

Indirect land use cahnge theory is also based on a false projection — That the number of acres planted in corn would double.

Ah, bobdroege reappears, after being repeatedly shot down on the recent thread with his ludicrous «theory» that a static, closed, laboratory gas cylinder in equilibrium is somehow analogous to the dynamic, open, not - in - vertical - equilibrium 100 km atmosphere in a gravity - field, and his false claim that NASA used «circular reasoning» in deriving the «NASA Fact Sheet» physical values for Venus.

Confirmation holism in the context of a complex model implies that a single element of the model can not be tested in isolation since each element depends on the other elements, and hence it is impossible to determine if the underlying theories are false by reference to the evidence.

Who was the first anonymous commentator in this thread to insult a real named commentator's intelligence and claim their statements were false in a bipolar rant based on their own purely imaginary stereotypes woven into an ad hoc international conspiracy theory between Mitsubishi and the Pentagon, despite the original claims being easily verified on the MHI, NASA, YouTube, and ANS web sites, so turning a poignant moment into (as DrJohnGalan correctly labelled it) «the unpleasantness shown here»?

Simplistic without the grace of simplicity, generality - strewen without general applicability, relying on inference from dataset rather than mathematical analyses of data, following none of the usual rules of hypothesis testing nor verifiability, unvalidated, sometimes specious and occasionally jumping from the subject to throw in a slide about a red dot on a grid that could only be described as propaganda, unless one chooses to describe it as false, the «Pope Theory» is far from infallible.

There now appears to be evidence that all our existing climate models and theories are based on a false premise.

What is even more ironic about the question is that the other thing that skepticism is based on is the false idea that the lack of being able to «prove» Climate Change — both the extent it will occur and over what time frame — is somehow refutation of the basic theory itself.

the cause of the accident is the fact that the geopgysicist community (source SciAm in french version) in the 70s was feelin that this could not happens where it happend, because the rift / break (correct me, I'm alien) was supposed to glide nicely with small earthquake, and quakeless glide (assumed because ther was difference between earthequake constraints relaxed, and total constraint created by usual move)... after that, people discover that ther have been big tsunamis, big earthquake, and that the theory may be false... but the power plant was built on a pretend safe place, and not beeing sure of the new theory, not much was done to anticipate a huge tsunami.

These beliefs are (in our view) both false and dangerous, but as stated, they do not depend on, or posit, any kind of conspiracy theory.

Or do you believe that the theory will continue to live long after the facts on the ground have shown it to be false?

The Court's theory of harm in this case was premised on the assumption that healthcare professionals — arguably experts in the field of pharmaceuticals and their side - effects — can be misled by false information.

The dogma of clarity, as we shall see, is based on a false theory of knowledge; its scorn of ornament, on a misleading taxonomy of style; the frequent exhortations to sincerity, on a naïve theory of the self; and the unctuous moralizing, on a Boy Scout didacticism

False performance claims may also be challenged by private plaintiffs in misleading advertising claims commenced under section 52 of the Competition Act (i.e., based on the theory that inaccurate performance claims are either literally false or misleadFalse performance claims may also be challenged by private plaintiffs in misleading advertising claims commenced under section 52 of the Competition Act (i.e., based on the theory that inaccurate performance claims are either literally false or misleadfalse or misleading).

Jimmy Kimmel called out Donald Trump Jr. for perpetuating conspiracy theories by liking two false stories on Twitter about a Florida school shooting survivor.

Don't you think it would have been smart to have a convo with your stepson @DonaldJTrumpJr before he liked a post about a false conspiracy theory which... put a target on my back?»

LEADERSHIP COUNCIL, THE, research and articles on Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS), Parental Alienation theory, False Memory Syndrome, the politics of child abuse, and other issues.