Sentences with phrase «false understanding of»

Whether these statements have been sincere or just parroting propaganda, they have perpetuated a false understanding of the Second Amendment that has paralyzed state legislatures and Congress from taking steps to restrain gun violence and improve public safety.

with a false understanding of reality, and this is where even the serious media organizations have much to improve.

However, a common false understanding of how the economy works can still lead to different policy conclusions on climate change, given that the totalitarian central - planning impulse strikes everyone in a different way.

Pay attention to and educate others on how civil society's understanding of climate change issues has been manipulated by powerful forces, that is, help citizens see the wizard behind the curtain who has been projecting a false understanding of climate change matters.

She discussed the importance of communicating climate information adequately to decision - makers in order to avoid a false understanding of this concept, and therefore to avoid erroneous assumptions that could lead to bad decisions.

But the substance of those interviews, and the narrative around them, the editorial decisions about what is included from those interviews, and the questions asked are all informed by the same preconceived and false understanding of the debate, and the positions within it.

«All we can do now is hope that nobody rushes through the game, has an awful time, and then gives the game a really harsh review based on a false understanding of what it's meant to be about.»

This advice is all based on a false understanding of what causes weight gain.

To pretend that it has and to construct an imaginary line of descent for a feminist religion indicates a false understanding of origins.

What was striking about the spinmeisters in this instance was that both the progressives and the conservatives / traditionalists seem to have a false understanding of what popes can do.

This is unfortunate in that people are being given a false understanding of who God is and what it means to be a christian.

From Alanus Anglicus to Pope Nicholas V, a false understanding of the papacy and of papal authority insinuated itself into the Church, finding expression, for example, in the notorious «bulls of donation» which are the target of much opprobrium in indigenous protest movements.

The entire premise is based upon a false understanding of scriptural intent.

It has a false understanding of the roots of evil, and its ideal of life is incompatible with the free development of man.

It may be fortunate for us that we have managed that adjustment, but it is based on a false understanding of the nature of religion.

For John Paul, socialism turned out the way it did — anti-growth, anti-human, and anti-worker — because it was based on a false understanding of human nature.

Consequently the kind of history and biography attempted unsuccessfully for Jesus by the nineteenth century is now seen to be based upon a false understanding of the nature of history and the self.

Interestingly, Buddhists feel that correcting our false understanding of «self» is key to undermining these hindrances.

I see the problem here — you have a false understanding of current cosmological theories.

Their mission was to replace the false understanding of science represented by Locke and his allies.

Unfortunately, in combating this false understanding of addiction, Hitchens errs to the other extreme by implying that the will remains untouched by addiction and asserting that if addicts are held merely accountable for their actions and blamed for the outcome of those actions, then «huge numbers of people will give up a bad habit even if it is difficult.»

The pope walks after his own ideology of a false understanding of.

Not exact matches

As long as we understand the negatives (a false reward, not to mention a bright light shining up at your face all evening that turns you into an insomniac), it's possible that we're underestimating the benefits in this new form of communication.

I can understand the benefits of having a safe haven currency like the traditional Swiss Franc which is divisible and liquid, however claims of Gold being illiqiud and something clumsy that can not be used as currency are false.

But one must also understand the ignorance of man like yourself, who has been mislead by false doctrines about God and have been blinded from the truth.

Muslims understand that Halloween has Pagan roots and in several fashions is a celebration of things we believe is wrong or bad such as fear of this world, death, and mythical false things.

Well, if «take very seriously» means conforming his politics to Church teaching, rather than his understanding of Church teaching to his politics, then this is patently false, and we do not need to peer into the soul of John Podesta to reach this conclusion.

Evolution is just as real as gravity, and as others have pointed out, we do not have a «complete» understanding of either of these, but that does not mean that either gravity or evolution are «false».

Failure to understand that in thermodynamics probabilities are not fixed ent.ities has led to a misinterpretation that is responsible for the wide - spread and totally false belief that the second law of thermodynamics does not permit order to spontaneously arise from disorder.

The pill gives many a false sense of who they are and how God made them, it distorts their understanding of their purpose in life.

We are not them or Him what have you, Yet we as so many christians especialy the born again ones cause their so out spoken, because of their false teaching or lack of understanding or thinking for themselves.

Despite that being completely false (atheists generally have a better understanding of theology than most god people), how does a «better understanding» of theology do anything other than convince one that it is a load of delusional crap?

That is, if Wilson's purely functionalist explanation of religion were to become widely accepted by religious people, it would then be rendered false» for the adaptive features of religions depend, on Wilson's account, upon religious people thinking it false that their religions are best understood as adaptive social organisms.

in the day, s that jesus our lord was on the earth (jesus) there was many people named jesus, just as among hispanic and central american peoples, it was a common popular name of many people, if you want to prove to your self that jesus was not married, look up what the apostle said,» i saw standing upon mount zion with the lamb 144,000, these are they that have washed thier robes and were not defilled with women, for they are virgins, jesus emphasised in parts the need and values of a husband and wife in a home, the two mary, s and the women that followed him and ministered unto him tells us the great importance of women, and women in the home, he wanted all married men to have thier own wife, in those days of so many years ago there was false prophets, storytellers, wild imaginations, he told us not to believe them, whether you are catholic, christian, islamic or any other, we can all take pride in the fact what the prohets, jesus and the apostles told us all fits jointly to gether, they were a work of love, to understand the christian bible correctly, islamic people are not rejected, but rather they are a equal, the angel told hagar to return to her mistress, he also told her he would make ishmael a blessing and his seed a great nation, regards

All our «false paths of human self - understanding reach their true end only through divine grace.»

«A man may imagine things that are false, but he can only understand things that are true, for if the things be false, the apprehension of them is not understanding.»

So to have someone who can finally speak from experience and explain to me that most of them don't understand their own doctrine, but it's still not an excuse because it's a damaging and false doctrine that the Bible clearly contradicts — is incredibly helpful and healing to my soul.

God calls His people not to impose our beliefs and dictate rights, but to warn others of the price of sin and the finality of inevitable death (in the same way we would wake someone asleep on railroad tracks), and to defend His Truths and to correct false understandings that deceive, and to share the joy that we experience from God's grace.

I find that 99 % of those who call this kind of post or writer false prophets are usually the ones who didn't really study or understand the word.

Cardinal Ruini spoke of «false interpretations» of cosmic and biological evolution which «contribute more than a little to a purely naturalistic understanding of man» and which also lead to «the denial of the existence of a personal God distinct from the world» and the denial of «the transcendence of the human subject, made in the image and likeness of God».

Don't idolize sports stars (I would think the most devout would understand the concept of not praying to false idols).

If two apparently contradictory passages are both true in the higher understanding, this means that at least one of them doesn't mean what it says, which means it is true (in the higher understanding) precisely because it is false (in the literal sense).

His point was that no one ought to be compelled to affirm as true a religious tenet he took to be false and that no one should be compelled to participate in a religious rite that violated his own understanding of his religious obligations.

Ong is atypical, however, in his pointing out that work, too, «is an expression of freedom and joy» when authentically pursued.67 Ong rightly understands that it is false to draw a distinction between play as individual, free, and spontaneous, and work as collective, intentional, and ordered.

I confess I am one of that minority of readers who admire Kierkegaard more for his literary and satiric gifts than for his contribution to philosophy — which I regard as dubious — or his understanding of Christianity — which I regard as, in many significant respects, disastrously false.

Wills» Syllabus errorum leaves virtually no room for what used to be the liberal understanding of the development of Catholic doctrine; as Wills surely understands, false doctrines are not said to «develop.»

«It is «the mass» — not this one or that one — that is now living, now dead, not a group of menials or of aristocrats, of rich or of poor, but the mass understood in a purely conceptual sense — which is the false.

Because of the «ism» at the end, making it appear as if it were an ideology, and the fact that they do not understand the definition of the word... and many seek to use a «false equivalency» in a bid to bolster their failed arguments, too.

Thus, given Mays's understanding of the relation of the formal and empirical sides of speculative philosophy in Whitehead, if we were to discover that our abstract system was false under the interpretation of «our concrete spatio - temporal scheme» (PW 32/25), we would not conclude that the system was false, rather that we must look elsewhere for an interpretation or a model under which it is true.

Since writing the review of the Colson and Pearcey book, my understanding of what Schaeffer was trying to do has been sharpened by reading a 1948 Bible Today article in which he argued that the controversy between evidentialism and presuppositionalism presents a false alternative.