Sentences with phrase «false views of»

Bennoune's candid interviews with Muslims who are bravely standing up to Islamist groups all around the world deconstruct false views of Islam and form a significant and compelling record of modern Muslim life.

All Christian claims that Judaism confesses a God of law in the formal / legal sense in contrast to a «Christian God» of grace are based on false views of fulfillment; such views not only damage Christian - Jewish relations but are devastating for the life of the church itself.

But what resulted from this state of affairs was a false view of reason as being totally opposed to belief, and of the natural world as being outside the realm of belief.

Chuck's clarification of words for God is certainly thorough, but where he writes, ``... the common association of «Allah» is tied to their false view of God,» I would add, just as the common association of Jesus is often tied to a false view of God, so I would shy away from using that name as well.

That being said, the common association of «allah» is tied to their false view of God.

Surely you can see the wisdom of Jefferson's «false view of Jefferson's so - called «wall of separation» doctrine».

This is all condoned under a false view of Jefferson's so - called «wall of separation» doctrine.

In it he found a rejection of the «true conception of substance,» a false view of evil, and a conception of God which does honor neither to God nor logic.2 And, like Sheen, Wyndam Lewis in England identified Whitehead's conception of God with that of Samuel Alexander and found it wholly inadequate as a resource for Christian thought.3

If Peter was to ever play the leadership role God wanted him to play in the kingdom community, Peter's cowardly character and false view of the messiah had to be exposed and replaced with a Christ - like character and true view of the messiah.

A false view of «the gods» may easily be blown away by the first breath of scientific knowledge, but a true faith in God is not destroyed but rather enhanced by every fresh discovery of the complexity of God's wisdom.

In the quote above and in much of the rest of your post, you present a false view of what people here argue in favor of.

• Test - based incentive programs have not raised student achievement in the United States to the level achieved in the highest - performing countries (and) incentives / sanctions can give a false view of exactly how well students are doing.

To many outside the industry, this looks like banning conservatives from the public square, but that's taking a very simplistic and borderline - false view of it.

The parent who has undermined the relationship has given the children a false view of the other parent, and only positive, first - hand experiences with the vilified parent can overcome this view.

In addition the devices act as «supervisors» which may result in a false view of adherence as the individual may no longer feel they have the autonomy to choose whether or not to adhere.11 Furthermore these devices do not easily capture the movements of therapeutic exercise.

Not exact matches

The risk with that kind of approach is that obvious falsehoods or offensive views get treated as though they were valid through a false attempt at balance.

Instead of viewing this as a false dichotomy, it's time for the brick and mortar store to adapt to the digital world to assure that it keeps up.

No small part of that mispricing, Buffett says, is driven by what he views as the false precision provided by models like Black - Scholes.

This is why atheists that have extrapolated the facts of biological evolution into a world view of purpose for existence (that is unsupported by the facts) clearly have a false god.

The more they can do that, the more they can push their views by them, or spread false ideas on to the low hanging fruit, who in turn make it a huge deal that the fruits higher up on the tree grab hold of and infect the rest of the fruits in their tree.

I am a bit puzzled why once again, though we had a promising start to dialogue, you dove into a line of attack you know full well is completely false in regards to my view.

Those who read the Krauss article should be warned that Krauss makes a false insinuation about the views on miracles and the Virgin Birth of Br.

But don't try to impose your false and bigoted views on the rest of society.

In your view are calvinists «true» followers of Jesus — just confused, or do you think that some of them fall beyond the bounds with false beliefs about Jesus and His work on the cross?

It is this false claim made by so many, particularly in more fundamental religious communities, that is being challenged by this simple illustration of the logical fallacy of such a view.

Enns rejects this assumption, arguing that «a false assumption of how the Bible ought to behave stands behind this critical and evangelical view.

Moreover, if all the formal possibilities are not controlled, we not only run the risk of fallaciously inferring the truth of one view from the difficulties of some only of its possible rivals, hut also we run the risk of trying to answer a perhaps meaningless question, namely, Which of two falsehoods (or absurdities) is more false?

To imagine him, with divine Omniscience, deliberately translating his message into the language of a world - view he knew to be false would make him a figure so artificial and unreal as to be neither credible nor attractive.

But actual entities do fall under the principle of relativity; therefore, the view in question must be false.

Speaking at the San Antonio Conference, Lesslie Newbigin made reference to his own cultural background in these terms: «As I look back on my own life as a missionary in India, I realize now in a way that I never did at that time that I was not only carrying the gospel but that I was also a carrier of this so - called modern world - view which I now see to be breaking down because it is false.

Has the false notion of an adversarial relationship between science and religion caused such division in subscribed beliefs that one can no longer view science and the belief in a superior intellect as a harmonious precept?

Between January and September of 2003, after conducting seven different polls, researchers found that the answer was yes: «A substantial portion of the public had a number of misperceptions that were demonstrably false, or were at odds with the dominant view in the intelligence community... [These misperceptions] have played a key role in generating and maintaining approval for the decision to go to war»

Most of us adopt the false view that the most important feature of having a job is the income it provides.

From the point of view of a Whiteheadian understanding, this is simply false, and an economy based on it will inevitably disrupt community and undercut many of the values of human life.

In a post — Cold War, post-9 / 11 world strewn with conflicts involving competing religious postures and contradictory global views, where supposed divisions on lines of race, culture, and faith are loudly promoted and violently exploited, the example of past wars fought in pursuit of religious idealism has proved seductive for some seeking false assurance from continuity with history.

In fact, I find that those who feel they have to censure themselves (and of course monitor others as well) are usually trying to present a false and more lofty view of themselves than is accurate, as if they are hiding the truth.

No matter how you look at it, the Christian view of a creator is false.

Please don't listen to these people on here they have so many different views and ideas of their own but don't listen to them they have closed their heart to God and are doing Satans work of misleading people away from the Almighty they look for men who like to have their ears tickled so don't take mine our anyone else's word for it look it up for your self history attests to the bible as true and The writings of Moses is far older than anything they have ever found thats right Moses wrote the first parts in the bible 3,500 years ago The scriptures weren't inspired by Pagan stories Pagan stories was inspired by actual events just like those in the bible because if you notice that a lot of the stories found in the bible have a lot to do about people worshipping false Gods.

the ultimate false religion is belief in the supremacy of one's own point of view, whether it be a belief in some invisible man in the sky or the reasoning of emotionally crippled minds.

Neither can the churches who maintain this horrible view of God and that is why so many are simply leaving this false and abusive teaching behind.

Thanks David — that helps some way to me understanding where you are coming from with what you mentioned before with your view — «abuse can happen under the guise of teaching that is not false».

And as far as the Jerusalem controversy, I would suggest that that debate was a good display of God giving a view of how men bring in false teaching, only to have God use his voices to make right a wrong view being introduced to the Church.

If these ministers hope to reaffirm the biblical view and to avoid implicating the Church in a false definition of marriage, then they should make the focus of their pledge something more relevant to the vast majority of the people seeking marriage: the prohibitions against sex before marriage and the prohibition against two Christians divorcing.

We finally ought to face up to the false claims made in some of our «fulfillment theologies» which have contributed immensely to the prevalent misconceptions about Christian views of redemption.

Definition of MYTH 1a: a usually traditional story of ostensibly historical events that serves to unfold part of the world view of a people or explain a practice, belief, or natural phenomenon b: parable, allegory 2a: a popular belief or tradition that has grown up around something or someone; especially: one embodying the ideals and inst - itutions of a society or segment of society b: an unfounded or false notion 3: a person or thing having only an imaginary or unverifiable existence 4: the whole body of myths

One is a false kind of objectivity that views the world, language, and interpretation as fixed (Brueggemann).

First of all I would like to point out that in another comment you appealed to the teachings of Christ to counter other false views.

From the ontological point of view, therefore, it is simply and recognizably false to conceive the passing into act of the agent as at bottom the positing of a duplicate and then to assert that no metaphysical problem arises because the agent is only doing what itself is, so that the effect is as obviously a matter of course as the agent.

It appears that «false teachers» have entered the community and have offered the congregation a world view other than that of the Pauline gospel.

There are false assumptions in the objection just proposed that we would like to uncover, assumptions based on a static view of reality.