It is written in the book of Dawkins 2:28 - 34 «Then shall the bearers of
false witness claiming supernatural phenomenon and worshipers of deitys fall upon the righteous with their knives and swords, tearing my people apart who did nothing but point out that their God's did not exist.
This story was enhanced with
false witness claiming that he had been «drunk» and driving at «120 kph» and failed to get back in trying to pass a truck.
Not exact matches
They simply hate the man and make up a pack of lies to see what they can make stick, even while
claiming to be Christians who conveniently forgot that one of the Ten Commandments is, «Thou shall not bear
false witness.»
You may not like the members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, you may not agree with their tenets, you may even feel you are such an expert on what makes someone a Christian and have the right to make the judgement on who is and who isn't, but spouting off inaccurate
claims indicates no credibility, and inasmuch as Jesus said «thou shalt not bear
false witness» I guess it doesn't leave you looking much like a Christian.
«It is striking that at times, in
claiming to uphold the other commandments, they completely ignore the eighth, which forbids bearing
false witness or lying, and ruthlessly vilify others.»
We do it, by cunning, by power and prestige, by elaborately contrived
false witness - we too do it
claiming the while that it is done in the name of Yahweh, according to God's holy ordinance, even in the name of Jesus Christ, and of course because we are a Christian nation.
By
claiming someone else is a sinner, you violate one of the things that YOUR belief would dictate is a sin, by bearing
false witness.
This is combined with an alarming tendency to make sweeping statements such as; «New Testament scholars sometimes say that the Gospel accounts of the appearances of the risen Christ are
false and his followers did not intentionally
claim to be eye -
witnesses to his resurrection», without references to back it up.
Such teaching is also based on much
false witness, such as the
claim that being gay and being a pedophile are one and the same thing.
then going on about saying we shouldn't
claim grace as a property or place limits on it while simultaneously you withhold it to «nasty Catholics, Muslims, Anabaptists, Mormons, Jehovah's
Witnesses,
false Protestants»
In recent years, we have
witnessed an explosion in consumer fraud putative class actions focused on whether use of the
claims «natural,» «all - natural,» «100 percent natural» or similar terms on a food product's label is
false, misleading or deceptive.
These are common defenses that a dog owner may make if confronted by a personal injury
claim and can be hard to prove
false if there are no other
witnesses to confirm your side of the story.
After years - long discovery in a defense of a
False Claims Act action brought against a large healthcare company, including personally taking and defending more than twenty depositions of fact and expert witnesses, successfully excluded testimony of plaintiff / relator's experts and obtained complete summary judgment on all False Claims Act c
Claims Act action brought against a large healthcare company, including personally taking and defending more than twenty depositions of fact and expert
witnesses, successfully excluded testimony of plaintiff / relator's experts and obtained complete summary judgment on all
False Claims Act c
Claims Act
claimsclaims.
«Her office has subpoenaed my students» grades, questioned their motivation,
claimed they bribed
witnesses, leaked
false information about them from a case that's 13 years old, accused them of being an arm of the defense team — and that's not counting the stuff [her office has] said about me.
The Court also found that the
claims were opportunistic and based on «
false and misleading statements» from the claimant's principal
witnesses.
However, in a speech by Alun Milford in March 2016, [46] he made it very clear that the SFO will view «
false» or «exaggerated»
claims to privilege as unco - operative, and notwithstanding his acknowledgement that a
claim may be well founded, where a company discloses details of
witness accounts it will be viewed as a significant mark of co-operation.
The seminar component of the Clinic examines the principal problems that lead to the conviction of the innocent and the leading proposals for reform, including mistaken eyewitness identification,
false confessions, faulty forensic evidence, the role of forensic DNA testing, post-conviction remedies for innocence
claims, the use of «jailhouse snitches» and other cooperating
witnesses, incompetent defense counsel, and police and prosecutorial misconduct.