It's too soon to draw sweeping conclusions about the academic impact of privately financed programs that provide vouchers to help needy
families send their children to private schools, the General Accounting Office concludes in a recent report.
The program, also known as Opportunity Scholarships, uses taxpayer dollars to help low - income
families send their children to private schools.
Not exact matches
On issues like tuition vouchers for
families to send their
children to private and parochial
schools, Orthodox Jews have effectively allied themselves with Catholic and Evangelical Christian conservatives and have gained the support of senators like Joseph Lieberman (D - Conn.)
Marker cautions
families who choose
to send their
children with special needs
to private schools to make sure they communicate with the
schools about their special education needs.
(D.C.
school officials would certainly like
to know who those
children are, since
families making that kind of money typically
send their kids
to one of the
private schools that proliferate here.
What is even sadder is that those parents often come from
families that can't afford
to send their
children to private and parochial
schools to avoid the insanity of this program.
Orthodox
families, however,
send their
children to yeshivas, or Jewish
private schools.
And then there is his substantial baggage:
sending children to private schools, his shares (recently relinquished) in a
family company that doesn't pay a living wage or recognise trade unions, and previously owning shares in a tax - haven firm.
In addition
to contacting
private companies, parents had also considered giving
children at the
school large plastic bags
to store their coats, backpacks and other belongings, according
to a letter
sent out
to families this week from P.S. 87's parent coordinator.
For example, if a
child has a difference in his or her
family background which the
child is unable
to overcome and consequently can't attend a public
school, public funds may be used
to send the
child to a
private school.
He also emerged as a leading proponent of a federal tax credit for low - income
families who
send their
children to private schools.
The credits cut taxes on businesses that donate
to non-profit scholarship organizations, and those organizations help needy
families who want
to send their
children to private schools.
It is manifest in the residential choices made by
families... [and] when
families, sometimes at great financial sacrifice, decide
to send their
children to private schools....
It is still possible that adults who attended religious
schools have more favorable attitudes toward Jews because of unobserved advantages but this seems unlikely given that the generally more advantaged
families who
send children to non-religious
private schools do not appear
to yield lower anti-Semitism.
In 2010 and 2011, we asked instead about «a tax credit for individual and corporate donations that pay for scholarships
to help parents
send their
children to private schools,» language that implies the scholarships could be used by any
family, regardless of income.
Wealthy
families can afford
to live in districts with high - performing government
schools or
to send their
children to private schools.
Students must come from low - income
families who, except for the Cristo Rey program, would not be able
to send their
child to an academically superior
private school.
Meanwhile, advocates invoked the «hypocrisy» of voucher critics in Congress who were rich enough
to send their own
children to private schools but would deny that option
to the city's poorer
families.
School voucher programs, which allow eligible
families to send their
children to private schools with the help of public funds, have sparked controversy since the first such initiative was launched in Milwaukee in 1991.
Wealthy
families can afford
to live in districts with high - performing government
schools or
send their
children to private schools.
Pence won big in his push
to expand the state's voucher program, successfully lifting the cap, which was previously $ 4,800, on the amount of money
families can receive when
sending their
children to private schools.
In several of America's cities, public
schools have long been dangerous or academically troubled; for
families with means, the solution has been
to send their
children to expensive
private schools or
to move
to better public -
school districts.
Pence has won big in his push
to expand the state's voucher program, successfully lifting the cap (previously $ 4,800) on the amount of money
families can receive when
sending their
children to private schools.
Most controversially,
school choice also includes vouchers and tuition tax - credits, which allow
families to use public dollars in order
to send their
children to private schools or provide tax credits
to individuals or corporations that make donations
to organizations that grant scholarships
to students.
The Nevada ESA program means
families who could never before afford
to send their
child to private school now have the ability
to do so.
Williams was also concerned about the raising of income caps for the voucher program, as this gradually shifted funding toward
families who were already
sending their
children to private schools.
Both the Wisconsin and Milwaukee Parental Choice Programs allow
families to send their
children to private schools tuition - free through a voucher program.
If that's the case, why spend money
to advertise the Opportunity Scholarship program
to families who already have the means
to send their
children to private schools?
Choudhury, 34, can be found juggling what he calls «design for diversity» as he focuses on providing students and their
families more
school choices in San Antonio, and a new enrollment system that will make those choices easier
to access in a district where many
families who could afford
to leave did so, or who
sent their
children to private schools or charter
schools, said Superintendent Pedro Martinez.
and Susan Collins (R - Maine) haven't given up on their bid
to save the federally funded voucher program that allows low - income
families in the District
to send their
children to private schools.
Through the Choice programs,
families are able
to send their
children to the
private school of their choice — at no cost
to the
family.
Yes, sacrificing the have - nots by taking more educational dollars from already struggling public
school Districts and
sending them
to upper class / upper middle class
families who want
to send their
children to private schools.
These government funded dollars will serve as tuition payments for
families who want
to send their
children to a
private school of choice.
In 1990, Milwaukee parents were given a choice that no other
families in the country had: They could
send their
children to private schools for free with taxpayer - funded vouchers.
Only about half of the
private schools participating in voucher programs provided special education or disability related information on their websites, creating a significant problem for
families making a decision about where
to send their
children.
A voucher is an allotment of money from the government that
families can use
to send their
children to a
private school.
The state's voucher program provides taxpayer funds for
families to send their
children to private schools.
Last year, the taxpayers of Indiana paid out $ 146.1 million
to voucher
schools, with most of it going
to families who would have
sent their
children to private school anyway.
Imagine the state pays for low - income
families to send their
children to private schools, many of them operated by the local Catholic archdiocese.
Some Syrian
families have found ways
to supplement or replace the public
school system by
sending their
children to private schools or informal ones run by NGOs and religious organizations, including some that teach the Syrian rather than Lebanese curriculum.
In some neighborhoods,
families have a choice of
sending their
children to high - performing district
schools or affording a
private or parochial education; meanwhile, many
families in low - performing districts who can not afford
to pay tuition have no high - quality choices — or can't gain access
to the handful that do exist.
The president's budget features a $ 1.4 billion
school choice package that includes millions of dollars in vouchers that low - income
families could use
to send their
children to private, religious
schools.
This bill clearly demonstrates that legislators» «
school choice» agenda is about providing subsidies
to wealthy
families that
send their kids
to private schools and NOT about ensuring that all students, including poor
children, have access
to a quality education.
The reason: many
families who
send their
children to private schools cross district lines.
Even in tough economic times,
schools have made assisting
families who want
to send their
children to private school a top priority in their budgets.
Affluent
families can move
to different neighborhoods,
send their
children to private schools, and supplement
schooling with enrichment opportunities.
It's an oft - noted irony of the confrontation in Chicago that Mayor Rahm Emanuel
sends his
children to the
private, $ 20,000 - a-year University of Chicago Lab
School, which means his family doesn't really have much of a personal stake in what happens to the school system he is trying to r
School, which means his
family doesn't really have much of a personal stake in what happens
to the
school system he is trying to r
school system he is trying
to reform.
This change
to 529 savings accounts immediately benefit wealthy
families who already
send their
children to private schools, but now they will be able
to offset their tuition that they already intended
to pay for, but now can receive a tax credit for it.
Wealthier
families can afford
to live in districts with better district
schools or
send their
children to private schools.
This may sound like a reasonable option for parents interested in
sending their
children to private schools, but in reality the plan would do little
to help many
families with the cost.