Sentences with phrase «families send their children to schools of their choice»

The Arizona Supreme Court had previously upheld a scholarship tax - credit law, which granted dollar - for - dollar tax credits to taxpayers in return for contributions to non-profit scholarship organizations that help families send their children to the schools of their choice.

The first major push to let American families send their children to schools of their choice using public funds was led by Catholics seeking to escape discriminatory public schools.

Not exact matches

«We must reward donations to support public schools, give tax credits to teachers who pay for classroom supplies out of pocket, and ease the financial burden on families who exercise choice in sending their children to a nonpublic school.

Laura Lavine (LR): Families of financial means who are interested in making educational choices for their children often, in the city of Syracuse, choose to send their children to non-public schools, or they leave the city all together.

The result: five «choice» schools where Gainesville families can opt to send their children, regardless of neighborhood boundaries.

Other Detroit families, around 14 percent, take advantage of Michigan's interdistrict choice law that allows them to send their children to nearby suburban schools.

Big - city public schools are in big - time trouble, and many families send their children to their local school more out of necessity than choice.

Big - city public schools are in big - time trouble, and many families send their children to their local schools more out of necessity than choice.

It would enable families to send their children to any school of choice, but also to purchase additional educational tools — such as textbooks, online courses, and educational therapies — to have the greatest chance of success for their children.

Through the Choice programs, families are able to send their children to the private school of their choice — at no cost to the fChoice programs, families are able to send their children to the private school of their choice — at no cost to the fchoice — at no cost to the family.

«We must reward donations to support public schools, give tax credits to teachers who pay for classroom supplies out of pocket, and ease the financial burden on families who exercise choice in sending their children to a nonpublic school.

These government funded dollars will serve as tuition payments for families who want to send their children to a private school of choice.

It is worth nothing that 84 percent of families would have been unable to send their children to the schools of their choice had it not been for tax - credit scholarships.

Does the OPSB have the capacity to prevent the system from splitting up families, and sending children across town?Is OPSB capable of making the necessary changes that will make the choice of a school less of a chore for the cities families?

Families must be allowed to use their tax - paid dollars to send their children to the schools of their choice.

This week's Louisiana Supreme Court opinion that struck down a school choice funding formula finds the usual suspects who want to prevent families from using their tax - paid dollars to send their children to the schools of their choice.

In some neighborhoods, families have a choice of sending their children to high - performing district schools or affording a private or parochial education; meanwhile, many families in low - performing districts who can not afford to pay tuition have no high - quality choices — or can't gain access to the handful that do exist.

The president's budget features a $ 1.4 billion school choice package that includes millions of dollars in vouchers that low - income families could use to send their children to private, religious schools.

«This is a huge victory for the Louisiana Scholarship Program, which provides low income families with the same opportunity as more affluent parents already have — the financial resources to send their child to the school of their choice.»

Meanwhile, the expansion of school choice in DC encouraged more white and middle - class families to send their children to public schools, and provided an escape route to some poor children who would otherwise have attended failing neighborhood schools.

In Michigan, state funding follows the student, so a local district loses funding if a family relocates, or chooses to send their children to a charter school or a school in a neighboring conventional district (permitted under a cross-district «schools of choice» program).

The program affords low - income families with the same opportunity as more affluent parents — the financial resources to send their child to the school of their choice.