Sentences with phrase «family courts determine»

Welcome to The Maggio Law Firm's PODCAST explaining how California Family Courts determine child support.

Primarily, family courts determine child custody based on the best interests of the child.

As mandated by child custody laws in Vermont, the state's family courts determine all custody issues based on the best interests of the child.

The family courts determine custody arrangements based on family dynamics and upon evaluating the above - mentioned factors.

And he added that the city is spending $ 31 million on Close to Home, a juvenile justice program that places city youth whom family courts determine need a period of out - of - home placement in residential programs closer to their families and communities — a program that used to be funded by the state.

In most states, family courts determine child custody arrangements based on what is in the best interests of the child.

Primarily, family courts determine child custody based on the best interests of the child.

The family court determined that, because the parties had agreed only the issues of divorce and child support were before the family court, it did not have jurisdiction over the issue of attorney's fees.

Mother was still hospitalized when the family court held a probable cause hearing on May 24, 2012; the family court determined probable cause existed to remove Child and granted DSS custody of Child «[p] ending further orders.»

If the family court determines the Cobb County order was not a valid order under the UCCJEA, it shall then determine whether the Pennsylvania order was a valid order under the UCCJEA.

The family court determined an award of attorney's fees was appropriate because Father was in a better financial position to pay attorney's fees.

The family court determined that Wife had an income of $ 10,418.16 per month and Husband had an income of $ 6,792 per month.

Whereas, however, the family court determined that the entire business had been transmuted into a marital asset, there was no finding that the nonmarital portion of Wife's retirement account had been transmuted.

In order to make wife whole, the family court determined the value of the marital residence and ordered husband to pay to wife lump sum alimony in that amount.

The family court determined it was.

The Court of Appeals ruled that much of the property the family court determined to be transmuted was not.

Not exact matches

If an Alabama court determines that domestic violence has occurred, the court will presume that it is not in the best interests of the child to be placed in the sole custody or joint legal or physical custody of the person accused of domestic or family violence.

An Ohio family court will utilize the following factors to determine best interests of the child:

Primarily, a family court in North Dakota determines custody based on the best interests of the child.

A family court in Illinois considers several factors when determining child custody.

Family courts in Illinois prefer to award parents joint legal custody, noting that joint physical custody should be determined by the parents» agreement or the court's order.

In determining whether joint custody is appropriate, a family court in Illinois will consider the following factors:

Family courts in Georgia use the following factors to determine the best interests of the child:

Family courts in New Jersey can order a custody arrangement agreed upon by both parents unless it is determined that the requested custody arrangement does not serve the child's best interests.

A family court in Arizona will consider the following factors in determining child custody:

Family courts in New Jersey consider several factors when determining child custody arrangements.

A North Carolina family court uses several factors to determine child custody.

In the state of Tennessee, family courts use several factors to determine child custody cases.

A family court's award of joint custody will determine where the child will physically live and when, and the court will also make a determination regarding how major decisions regarding his health, education, and religious needs will be made.

A family court in New Hampshire will determine child custody based on the best interests of the child.

A family court in Kentucky determines custody based on best interests of the child factors that include the wishes of the parents, the child, and his relationship with each parent as well as with his siblings and extended family members.

A family court judge will determine various aspects of how the division of care for any children will be conducted.

Primarily, a family court in Montana determines custody based on the best interests of the child.

A man who donated sperm to a married lesbian couple has no right to demand a genetic test to assert his claim to be their child's father, a state appeals court determined, overturning the determination of a Family Court judge in the Southern court determined, overturning the determination of a Family Court judge in the Southern Court judge in the Southern Tier.

The case eventually made it to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals, which determined that the district would not be required to reimburse the family because it had met the standard of providing «some educational benefit,» which the 10th Circuit said was consistent with the standard established in 1982 in the Supreme Court's Board of Education of Hendrick Hudson School District v. Rowley (Rowley) decision.

A recent public opinion poll conducted in Bridgeport included questions about Malloy, Mayor Bill Finch, Paul Vallas, members of the Working Family Party who serve as the outspoken minority on the Bridgeport Board of Education and Carmen Lopez, the former Connecticut superior court judge who brought the lawsuit that determined that Paul Vallas lacked the credentials necessary to serve as a superintendent of schools in Connecticut.

The Court then made clear that the situation at hand differs significantly with that in Noorzia (case C - 338 / 13), where at stake was an optional rule expressly leaving Member States the discretion to determine the minimum age of spouses for family reunification.

So, said Lord Wilson, the «meticulous duty» cast upon family courts by s 25 (2) is inconsistent with any summary power to determine either that an ex-wife has no real prospect of successfully prosecuting her claim or that an ex-husband has no real prospect of successfully defending it.

Her case will be determined by the Supreme Court Judges, one of whom, their President, is the newly appointed Lady Hale; an eminent Family Judge who lent her support to Resolution's campaign to abolish fault based divorce.

When determining a parenting plan, the family court will take several different factors into account.

Wallace v. Kaulback: In this decision of the Ontario Court of Justice released in late 2016, the Court was asked to determine whether Mr. Wallace had a settled intention to treat Mrs. Kaulback's eldest child, J, as a member of his family, such that he had an ongoing child support obligation to her.

stated that it «must ascertain whether the domestic courts conducted an in - depth examination of the entire family situation and of a whole series of factors, in particular of a factual, emotional, psychological, material and medical nature, and made a balanced and reasonable assessment of the respective interests of each person, with constant concern for determining what the best solution would be for the

If the court finds family violence in any custody case, it can consider it to determine which parent is the safest parent to care for the child.

Child Support and Assets in Arizona Arizona family court utilizes a standard calculation based on the income of both parties and parenting time awarded to both parties to determine child support awards and amounts.

The prime directive for the court in deciding Calgary child custody cases and for deciding Calgary family law cases and for determining Calgary child parenting time is the «best interests» of the child.

The savvy Chinese Foreign Family Judgment Enforcement Lawyers at MacLean Family Law also handle multi-million dollar cases where BC courts need to determine whether BC should take jurisdiction or let some other country's legal system decide family disputes between spouses who have spread their wealth and ventures across many continents and counFamily Judgment Enforcement Lawyers at MacLean Family Law also handle multi-million dollar cases where BC courts need to determine whether BC should take jurisdiction or let some other country's legal system decide family disputes between spouses who have spread their wealth and ventures across many continents and counFamily Law also handle multi-million dollar cases where BC courts need to determine whether BC should take jurisdiction or let some other country's legal system decide family disputes between spouses who have spread their wealth and ventures across many continents and counfamily disputes between spouses who have spread their wealth and ventures across many continents and countries.

This appeal considered whether a commissioning body can, by its decision not to fund a particular option for contact, remove the jurisdiction of the Court of Protection to make a best interests decision about contact, and whether the failure to conduct a best interests assessment and / or determine the facts breached the appellant's rights under the ECHR to a fair trial and a family life.

In the Family Law Act 1986... there is a code for the recognition and enforcement of an order for custody made in one part of the UK by a court in another part of the UK and framework to determine declaratory relief in matters of marital status, legitimacy and legitimation and adoptions effected overseas.

His opinion also provide a non-exclusive list of factor he would have had the family court consider in determining whether Mother was fit:

The Arizona Court of Appeals added that to change a previous custody order, the family court must determine that there has been a material change in circumstances affecting the welfare of the child and they will not disturb the family court's decision without a clear abuse of discreCourt of Appeals added that to change a previous custody order, the family court must determine that there has been a material change in circumstances affecting the welfare of the child and they will not disturb the family court's decision without a clear abuse of discrecourt must determine that there has been a material change in circumstances affecting the welfare of the child and they will not disturb the family court's decision without a clear abuse of discrecourt's decision without a clear abuse of discretion.