Sentences with phrase «family households with children»

Most people believe that boys need male role models, and yet in 2012, a little over 27 percent of all family households with children under age 18 are single - mother households, up from 25 percent in 2007.

Jennings made our list because of the number of family households with children and its lower housing costs.

Not exact matches

Other measures include: • remove rule limiting Child Tax Credit (CTC) to one claimant per household (to allow two or more families sharing a house to claim the CTC); • repeal $ 10,000 cap on medical expense tax credit claims made on medical costs incurred for an eligible dependent; • easier access to funds in Registered Disability Savings Plans for beneficiaries with shortened life spans; • improved Employment Insurance benefits to parents of gravely ill, murdered, or missing children; and • enhanced ability to make transfers between individual RESPs, and better access to RESP funds for post-secondary students studying outside Canada.

Some 63 percent of single family households include children; only 34 percent of apartment renters have children living with them.

With a pre-tax household income of $ 35,360 annually, the two - income family would still fall short of meeting basic needs for two children in every state.

The interview format used by the Oliner team had over 450 items and consisted of six main parts: a) characteristics of the family household in which respondents lived in their early years, including relationships among family members; b) parental education, occupation, politics, and religiosity, as well as parental values, attitudes, and disciplinary approaches; c) respondent's childhood and adolescent years - education, religiosity, and friendship patterns, as well as self - described personality characteristics; d) the five - year period just prior to the war — marital status, occupation, work colleagues, politics, religiosity, sense of community, and psychological closeness to various groups of people; if married, similar questions were asked about the spouse; e) the immediate prewar and war years, including employment, attitudes toward Nazis, whether Jews lived in the neighborhood, and awareness of Nazi intentions toward Jews; all were asked to describe their wartime lives and activities, whom they helped, and organizations they belonged to; f) the years after the war, including the present — relations with children and personal and community — helping activities in the last year; this section included forty - two personality items comprising four psychological scales.

Some of Clinton's plans include guaranteeing 12 weeks of paid family and medical leave, expanding early childhood education, capping childcare expenses at 10 percent of a household's income, helping the families of children with autism and other special needs get access to more resources and support, and insuring more families through the Affordable Care Act.

The distinction between the nuclear and traditional family was also blurred in the recent report on human sexuality by the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) titled Keeping Body and Soul Together: «Although many Christians in the post-World War II era have a special emotional attachment to the nuclear family, with its employed father, mother at home, and two or more school - aged children, that profile currently fits only 5 percent of North American households.»

Both mother and father may be employed, they might both work part time, they may both stay at home with the children, the mother might work while the father raises the children, or they may function together within an extended family or household.

Of course the television world does not completely exclude the real world, but families watch more than 45 hours each week, and in households with cable and subscription services the figure jumps to 58 hours, while most adults spend only 40 hours at work and children spend only 30 hours in school.2.

Last week, a Pew study revealed that in four out of ten American households with children, the mother is the sole or primary breadwinner for the family, the highest share on record.

The highest household consumers of soft drinks (both regular and low - kilojoule) are families with teenage children, while families with young children were the lowest overall.

You can support MFM by preparing a meat free packed lunch for your child, by having your household go meat free on Mondays and by discussing what it's all about with the whole family.

In the United States, food waste in households and restaurants costs an average of $ 1,500 per year for a family of four and about $ 1,060 per year for the average household with children in the United Kingdom.

This Promotion is only open to legal residents of the 50 United States and District of Columbia who are at least 18 years old as of the date of entry, except officers, directors, members, and employees of the Sponsor, the judging organization (if applicable), or any other party associated with the development or administration of this Promotion, and the immediate family (i.e., parents, children, siblings, spouse), and persons residing in the same household, as such individuals.

The ideal to aim for is to have such good data about everyone in the family, that your letters would be addressed to named people — and that if a child lives across more than one household, you'd be writing to named people in each household, because all the adults involved in that child's life have significance, and you're engaging successfully with them.

And these days, unless children from poor families get a college degree, their economic mobility is severely restricted: Young people who grow up in families in the lowest income quintile (with household income below about $ 21,500) and don't obtain a B.A. now have just a one in two chance of escaping that bottom economic bracket as adults.

Her children have watched the family flee a physically abusive household with no money, transportation or job, to a safe environment in a loving home, with a car and food in the refrigerator.

The past six months, with the help of counseling, a healthy and loving household, and supportive family and friends, I've seen my children blossom and grow out of their pain.

Our children are fairly structured with naps, mealtimes, activities and discipline, so it is important that our sitter be an extension of our family and uphold our family values and household rules as it pertains to our children.

We see this often in families where the child may spend time with two different sets of parents / stepparents, but it can certainly happen within one household, too.

And I believe I am going to grow up and raise my future children in a happy household with an unbroken family.

• Simply excluding an abusive father is insufficient: when excluded from a household, abusive men typically continue their behaviour with new partners; and when an abusive man leaves a family, he normally continues to interact with between 6 - 10 children or step - children (Scott and Crooks, 2004).

Poppendieck lays this out well in her book, showing how, after normal household expenses, such a family could struggle to come up with the reduced price each day, five days a week, for their children.

13, 2015, among 1,807 U.S. parents with children younger than 18, also shows that in two - parent families, parenting and household responsibilities are shared more equally when both the mother and the father work full time than when the father is employed full time and the mother is employed part time or not employed.1 But even in households where both parents work full time, many say a large share of the day - to - day parenting responsibilities falls to mothers.

The median household income for families with two full - time working parents and at least one child under 18 at home is $ 102,400, compared with $ 84,000 for households where the father works full time and the mother works part time and $ 55,000 for households where the father works full time and the mother is not employed.

The traditional married couple family with children under 18 represented one out of every four total households, while 3.5 % of the total households are headed by single parents raising children under 18.

Across married and single parent families, all parents are working in more than 60 percent of households with children, up from 40 percent in 1965.

Nearly 8 % of American households with children can be categorized as «food insecure» which means that these families worry about not having enough money to buy food and as a result, often skip meals, substitute cheaper food, or eat less.

Most home visiting programs are voluntary, and states and communities encourage participation by families with risk for maltreatment (for example, families where parents have low levels of education, live in poverty, single - parent households, and parents who themselves were involved in the child welfare system).

The parents, whose children range from toddlers to young adults, came with a variety of aspirations for this experience, including bringing more consciousness to their parenting; being more grounded and having more communication in their family life; creating more flow and less stress in their household; slowing down to better enjoy small moments and emotional connection with family; and reconnecting with themselves.

The concept of Super Nanny is to bring television cameras into a family's home and with the help of Super Nanny, guide the children and parents to have a more harmonious household.

While working as a nanny and household manager for busy professionals in Chicago, she began to notice a pattern among all of her families: they needed assistance in managing the many aspects that come along with having children.

You can model these responses in your own household with both your child and other members of the family.

«Vanfraussen, Ponjaert - Kristoffersen and Brewaeys (2002) compared school - aged children from 24 intentional lesbian - mother households with children from 24 heterosexual - parent families and found no differences in the rates of teasing between the two groups.»

Studies show that household income for women and children is more likely to drop below the poverty level immediately following a divorce, 13 declining by as much as 50 percent and causing substantial reductions in earnings capability and long - term wealth.14 Compared with children in intact families, children of divorced parents:

Instead, the program is intended to serve the millions of impoverished American children whose parents can not send them to school with a home - packed lunch for a whole host of possible reasons that never seem to cross Parker's mind: the family's SNAP benefits fail to cover a month's worth of healthful food, in light of today's rising food costs; there is only one parent in the household and he or she works one or more jobs and is not home to pack a lunch; one or both caretakers are drug - addicted, mentally ill, physically disabled or otherwise unable to adequately provide for their children; the family lives in a homeless shelter and lacks access to kitchen facilities; the family lives in a food desert where healthful groceries are scarce, etc. etc..

If you can, try to reduce other demands by taking time off work, enlisting the support of family or friends, asking grandparents to help with the older children, or temporarily putting off other household duties.

Kendall - Tackett addresses a wide range of situations, including household management, work - family balance, parenting disabled children, and coping with the death of a child.

At an annual cost of $ 410 million, the Family Tax Relief Rebate provides $ 350 to households with children under age 17 and annual income between $ 40,000 and $ 300,000; the Property Tax Freeze Rebate provides an amount equal to the annual increase in property taxes to homeowners earning less than $ 500,000 in tax cap - compliant local governments and school districts and costs $ 783 million annually.

This IFS research puts the Budget's regressive impact beyond doubt: the poorest will be hit more than many of the richest in cash terms let alone as a percentage; poor and middle income families with children lose out more than any other household types and the very poorest families with children lose more than any other groups — with 5 per cent of their total income being cut.

The UC changes impose a «two - child» benefit limit on households with at least two children, meaning that no extra support will go to children born after April 2017 in families making a new tax credit claim.

Nor is there anything in the strategy to improve the lot of the 3.4 million households (including a million families with children) renting privately on short - term tenancies with rocketing rents.

83 % of those households are families with children under the age of 18 and in total 87,010 children in the capital are now living in temporary accommodation.

That this House declines to give a Second Reading to the Welfare Benefits Up - rating Bill because it fails to address the reasons why the cost of benefits is exceeding the Government's plans; notes that the Resolution Foundation has calculated that 68 per cent of households affected by these measures are in work and that figures from the Institute for Fiscal Studies show that all the measures announced in the Autumn Statement, including those in the Bill, will mean a single - earner family with children on average will be # 534 worse off by 2015; further notes that the Bill does not include anything to remedy the deficiencies in the Government's work programme or the slipped timetable for universal credit; believes that a comprehensive plan to reduce the benefits bill must include measures to create economic growth and help the 129,400 adults over the age of 25 out of work for 24 months or more, but that the Bill does not do so; further believes that the Bill should introduce a compulsory jobs guarantee, which would give long - term unemployed adults a job they would have to take up or lose benefits, funded by limiting tax relief on pension contributions for people earning over # 150,000 to 20 per cent; and further believes that the proposals in the Bill are unfair when the additional rate of income tax is being reduced, which will result in those earning over a million pounds per year receiving an average tax cut of over # 100,000 a year.

Among families with working mothers and incomes below the poverty line — $ 18,310 for a family of three — child care absorbs nearly a third of total household budgets, according to census data.

Families with a household income of more than # 50,000 to stop getting child tax credit.

The findings are especially relevant to families with children living in low - income households; these kids are at greater risk of health problems resulting from poor air quality.

NCCP defines a poor household as one where incomes are below the federal poverty threshold (i.e., $ 24,036 for a family of four with two children in 2015).

NCCP defines a low - income household as one where incomes fall below 200 percent of the Federal Poverty Threshold (e.g., $ 48,016 for a family of four with two children in 2014).