Sentences with phrase «family law courts for»

It is not uncommon for parents to ask family law courts for permission to move and take children out of state or otherwise change child custody and visitation orders.

Family Law Courts for Children and Young People - Information about the family law courts for children and young people.

It is compulsory under Australian family law for separated parents to attempt Family Dispute Resolution before applying to a family law court for parenting orders.

Grandparents can apply to a family law court for a parenting order.

Under state law, a grandparent can ask a family law court for reasonable grandchild visitation rights in the following situations if the grandchild's parents have obtained a divorce; the child is in custody of someone other than a parent; or if the child's parent, who is the child of the grandparent seeking visitation, has died.

Not exact matches

The laws typically allow the police or family members to petition a court for a temporary gun restraining order that might last a few weeks.

As for my part, I am filing a complaint with the Minnesota Supreme Court Chief Justice and asking her and The Court to mark Tony Jones as a Vexatious Litigant in that state (he has to get judicial approval to sue); asking The Court to take action against Tony Jones» attorney's (M. Sue Wilson's) law license; and asking the Court to order an investigation into the family court judge who signed the Order (as it has been alleged that she is possibly the former law partner of M. Sue WiCourt Chief Justice and asking her and The Court to mark Tony Jones as a Vexatious Litigant in that state (he has to get judicial approval to sue); asking The Court to take action against Tony Jones» attorney's (M. Sue Wilson's) law license; and asking the Court to order an investigation into the family court judge who signed the Order (as it has been alleged that she is possibly the former law partner of M. Sue WiCourt to mark Tony Jones as a Vexatious Litigant in that state (he has to get judicial approval to sue); asking The Court to take action against Tony Jones» attorney's (M. Sue Wilson's) law license; and asking the Court to order an investigation into the family court judge who signed the Order (as it has been alleged that she is possibly the former law partner of M. Sue WiCourt to take action against Tony Jones» attorney's (M. Sue Wilson's) law license; and asking the Court to order an investigation into the family court judge who signed the Order (as it has been alleged that she is possibly the former law partner of M. Sue WiCourt to order an investigation into the family court judge who signed the Order (as it has been alleged that she is possibly the former law partner of M. Sue Wicourt judge who signed the Order (as it has been alleged that she is possibly the former law partner of M. Sue Wilson.

Ahead of Marriage Week we look at an article by former family law court judge Paul Coleridge on why marriage is always the best option for children.

What is more, they can be greatly helped if they see that this is indeed the chief stress in public prayer or church worship, so that such social praying is undertaken by a family of God's children addressing a loving Father (who makes demands upon them, to be sure, but who is no hateful dictator nor absentee ruler nor moral tyrant, but genuinely concerned for their best development as his children), rather than a kind of law - court or imperial audience with a terrifying deity.

Companies with fewer than 50 employees are not likely to be subject to federal laws that govern how employers handle leave for family and medical reasons, bereavement, military leave, jury duty, court cases and voting.

Following her graduation from USC, Stefanie clerked for the Honorable Fred Keiser, Jr. in the New Jersey Superior Court, Family Law Division.

Speaking of the law, Kourlis says the adversarial model of family court is making things worse for families and businesses.

And for that, because the laws in all these areas are so different and because they change all the time, I really do think that if you want to have a contract then you need to go to a lawyer who is a family lawyer, who is also really familiar with lesbian and gay and bisexual and transgender law, who will understand what the issues are and what you might need to put into this agreement, and who can also tell you when you may or may not hold up in court and what the risks and the benefits are.

Now, they're becoming insistent that their role be respected in family court and that the traditional stereotypes have to go,» says Joe Cordell, co-founder of a St. Louis - based law firm whose website notes its «dedication to leveling the playing field for men in family law cases.»

Until recent years, husbands hitting their spouses in the US was considered «reasonable chastisement of wives» and «a private family matter» by the courts and by law enforcement even though it has technically been against the law in all fifty states for decades.

California family courts consider a number of factors before granting a parent either sole custody or joint custody, but parents who wish to file for child custody in California should first become familiar with the laws in the state.

You may also find what you're looking for on our state - specific Family Courts and Family Law Forms pages.

Robert McDonnell, who had vigorously asserted his innocence, said in his statement that he appreciated the Justice Department «applying the correct rule of law articulated by the Supreme Court» and «for doing justice for me, my family, my friends, my Commonwealth and its servants, and for all those involved in the democratic process.»

«The Human Rights Act and the European convention on human rights have been instrumental in preventing local authorities from snooping on law - abiding families, in removing innocent people from the national DNA database, in preventing rapists from cross-examining their victims in court, in defending the rights of parents to have a say in the medical treatment of their children, in holding local authorities to account where they have failed to protect children from abuse, in protecting the anonymity of journalists» sources, and in upholding the rights of elderly married couples to be cared for together in care homes.»

And Florida Gov. Rick Scott is currently pushing for a «red flag» law — which allow family members and cops to seek a court order preventing a dangerous person from possessing or buying firearms — in his deeply conservative state.

Islip Town Attorney Robert L. Cicale of Islip Terrace, now in his second term, was also nominated to run for Suffolk County District Court judge, along with John P. Schettino of West Islip, a trial attorney who is the law secretary to Suffolk County Family Court Judge Philip Golgas.

The announcement of the new party line comes weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court, citing religious rights, ruled that requiring family - owned corporations to pay for insurance coverage for contraception under the Affordable Care Act violated a federal law protecting religious freedom.

Under the proposed measure, family members or law enforcement could petition a court for «Extreme Risk Protection Orders,» which, if granted, would allow officers to temporarily confiscate firearms and prevent the purchase of additional weapons by those deemed at risk of causing harm to themselves or others.

The law professor seeking to steal the Working Families Party line from Gov. Cuomo was once «reprimanded» for not telling the court where she lived.

During his time at the Pride Agenda he has been actively involved with the passage of dozens of laws, ordinances, regulations and Executive Orders on the state and local level affecting New York's LGBT community, including statewide measures like: the Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Act; the Hate Crimes Act of 2000; making the state's 9/11 relief inclusive of same - sex couples; guaranteeing domestic partners hospital visitation, legal authority over a loved one's bodily remains, access to Family Court and medical decision making authority; prohibiting discrimination on the basis of gender identity and expression in state employment; and securing over $ 50 million of funding for LGBT health and human services.

I would like to point out what the duties of a law clerk are and why Gilda Riccardi is the best choice for the newly created Family Court Judgeship.

The Edelstein family, whose «Imperial Court Hotel» was fined thousands of dollars by the city for violating zoning laws, collectively donated $ 25,000 to Greenfield.

It also demands the passage of laws guaranteeing renters an attorney in housing court, a $ 15 - an - hour minimum wage, more construction projects employing union workers and local residents, more supportive housing for people with HIV, and an end to former Mayor Michael Bloomberg's «cluster - site» housing — where the city paid landlords $ 3,000 a month to put up homeless families, often in deplorable conditions.

GVROs allow family members and intimate partners who believe a relative's dangerous behavior may lead to violence to request an order from a civil court authorizing law enforcement to remove any guns in the individual's possession, and to prohibit new gun purchases for the duration of the order.

WASHINGTON — A lawyer for an impoverished North Dakota family urged the U.S. Supreme Court last week to strike down a state law that provides free bus transportation to students in some districts but requires those in other districts to pay for such services.

Joining us are Jessica Pinson Pennington, executive director of the Truancy Intervention Project in Georgia, and Barbara Babb and Gloria Danziger of the Truancy Court Program organized by the Center for Families, Children and the Courts at the University of Baltimore School of Law.

In «Fighting Truancy: Voices from the trenches,» Ed Next talks with Jessica Pinson Pennington, executive director of the Truancy Intervention Project in Georgia, and Barbara Babb and Gloria Danziger of the Truancy Court Program organized by the Center for Families, Children and the Courts at the University of Baltimore School of Law.

The Arizona Supreme Court had previously upheld a scholarship tax - credit law, which granted dollar - for - dollar tax credits to taxpayers in return for contributions to non-profit scholarship organizations that help families send their children to the schools of their choice.

A controversial state law that would offer education savings accounts to all parents regardless of family income is tied up in the courts, with the state attorney general pushing this week for the state's Supreme Court to step in and decide the law's constitutionality.

After the 2002 U.S. Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of vouchers in Cleveland, the Institute for Justice, a public interest law firm, and Maine families again asked a Maine court to overturn the 1981 law, but the exclusion of religious options was upCourt decision upholding the constitutionality of vouchers in Cleveland, the Institute for Justice, a public interest law firm, and Maine families again asked a Maine court to overturn the 1981 law, but the exclusion of religious options was upcourt to overturn the 1981 law, but the exclusion of religious options was upheld.

I'm afraid this law will pass and it will have to be tested in court, wasting time and money for all citizens, but especially the families affected.

American Bar Association Center on Children and the Law American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children Child Abuse Prevention Network Child Welfare Information Gateway (Children's Bureau, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services) Child Welfare League of America International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect Kempe Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Child Abuse and Neglect National CASA (Court Appointed Special Advocates for Children) National Center for Prosecution of Child Abuse (National District Attorneys Association / American Prosecutors Research Institute) National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges National Council on Child Abuse and Family Violence Parents Anonymous Prevent Child Abuse America

This Indiana law allows a court to grant ex parte orders for protection in cases of domestic or family violence.

Under this Connecticut law, any family or household member who has been subjected to a continuous threat of present physical pain or physical injury by another family may apply to the Superior Court for an order of protection.

The research report suggests that a working group be established, with representation from family law practitioners, mediators and arbitrators, judges, and representatives from Alberta Justice and court administration, to develop a pilot early neutral evaluation program for use in family law disputes.

I would like to see equal access to effective legal representation, greater resources for family law courts which are overburdened and greater civility and cooperation among lawyers.

Finally, says Brooke LJ (at [52] and [64]-RRB- «family law practitioners who are concerend with proceedings which may lead to committal [must] be fully acquainted with the requirements of» the Convention, Art 6; for, he said, he was «completely satisfied that [the committal practice direction set outs] the practice which must be applied, both in civil courts and in family courts, in proceedings in which committal to prison may be in issue».

The Court further pointed out that as «the duration of an asylum procedure may be relevant and that, in particular in periods of substantial surges in applications for international protection, the time laid down by EU law are often exceed it» making the right to family reunification depend upon the moment when the asylum procedure is closed would de facto have the effect of nullifying that right and the protection under Article 10 (3)(a)(para 57).

Situated at the interface between EU citizenship, immigration law and the fundamental right to family life, this issue has proved to be a vexing one for the Court of Justice.

But Frank's court filings say it was Jamie, «an experienced businesswoman and attorney who actually specialized in the practice of family law for many years,» who was the driving force behind the post-nup.

Responses to the recent Court of Appeal case of Tina Owens asking the court to overturn a family judge's refusal to grant her an «unreasonable behaviour» divorce, demonstrate the lack of support for the currentCourt of Appeal case of Tina Owens asking the court to overturn a family judge's refusal to grant her an «unreasonable behaviour» divorce, demonstrate the lack of support for the currentcourt to overturn a family judge's refusal to grant her an «unreasonable behaviour» divorce, demonstrate the lack of support for the current law.

For self - help purposes, you can also look at the Alaska Court System's Self - Help Center for Family Law website, the Alaska Court System's Legal Research Center, and even check the current, official, and fully - searchable version of the Alaska StatutFor self - help purposes, you can also look at the Alaska Court System's Self - Help Center for Family Law website, the Alaska Court System's Legal Research Center, and even check the current, official, and fully - searchable version of the Alaska Statutfor Family Law website, the Alaska Court System's Legal Research Center, and even check the current, official, and fully - searchable version of the Alaska Statutes.

Together, the Council and its social justice collaboration partner, the Chicago Appleseed Fund for Justice, oversee program committees working on Criminal Justice Reform, Access to Justice, Child Support and Family Law Reform, and Immigration Court Reform.

When I first started practicing family law an early mentor, William J. Hamilton, III, told me that, «the evidence for a thousand divorces lies in the family court files.»

A court is more likely to award spousal support if a marriage lasted for many years, one spouse has health problems, there was a significant disparity between their incomes, a spouse had to stay home to care for the children while the other spouse worked full - time to support the family, or a spouse worked to help put the other spouse through graduate school, law school, etc..