Sentences with phrase «family law courts which»

I would like to see equal access to effective legal representation, greater resources for family law courts which are overburdened and greater civility and cooperation among lawyers.

Not exact matches

Culture has many complicated meanings, but I use it here simply to describe a system of beliefs (about God or reality or ultimate meaning), of values (about what is true, good and beautiful), of customs (about how to behave and relate to others), and of the institutions which express the culture (government, church, law courts, family, school and so on)-- all of which bind the society together and give it meaning.

Instead of having a high - conflict divorce, they may choose mediation or collaborative law instead of hiring pricy attorneys who often fuel the anger and going to family court, which is a disaster.

According to North Carolina child custody laws, if a military parent has sole or joint custody of a child and receives deployment papers that involve moving a substantial distance from the parent's home, a North Carolina family court will issue a temporary custody order of the child during the parent's absence, which shall end no later than 10 days following the parent's return.

And Florida Gov. Rick Scott is currently pushing for a «red flag» law — which allow family members and cops to seek a court order preventing a dangerous person from possessing or buying firearms — in his deeply conservative state.

Under the proposed measure, family members or law enforcement could petition a court for «Extreme Risk Protection Orders,» which, if granted, would allow officers to temporarily confiscate firearms and prevent the purchase of additional weapons by those deemed at risk of causing harm to themselves or others.

W and his family appealed to the Court of Cassation, France's highest court, which evaluates whether lower courts have properly applied theCourt of Cassation, France's highest court, which evaluates whether lower courts have properly applied thecourt, which evaluates whether lower courts have properly applied the law.

In April, the California Court of Appeal overturned the trial court's ruling in Vergara v. California [i], in which a group of families had challenged the constitutionality of state laws governing teacher tenure [ii](California state law automatically grants tenure to teachers after sixteen months, provides extra due process protections to teachers over and above those available to other state workers, and requires schools to use seniority rather than competency in layoff decisiCourt of Appeal overturned the trial court's ruling in Vergara v. California [i], in which a group of families had challenged the constitutionality of state laws governing teacher tenure [ii](California state law automatically grants tenure to teachers after sixteen months, provides extra due process protections to teachers over and above those available to other state workers, and requires schools to use seniority rather than competency in layoff decisicourt's ruling in Vergara v. California [i], in which a group of families had challenged the constitutionality of state laws governing teacher tenure [ii](California state law automatically grants tenure to teachers after sixteen months, provides extra due process protections to teachers over and above those available to other state workers, and requires schools to use seniority rather than competency in layoff decisions.)

The Arizona Supreme Court had previously upheld a scholarship tax - credit law, which granted dollar - for - dollar tax credits to taxpayers in return for contributions to non-profit scholarship organizations that help families send their children to the schools of their choice.

Finally, says Brooke LJ (at [52] and [64]-RRB- «family law practitioners who are concerend with proceedings which may lead to committal [must] be fully acquainted with the requirements of» the Convention, Art 6; for, he said, he was «completely satisfied that [the committal practice direction set outs] the practice which must be applied, both in civil courts and in family courts, in proceedings in which committal to prison may be in issue».

This is also the case in respect of domestic violence or of exclusion orders (mercifully, the former sop to The Daily Mail and assorted Tory MPs in the Family Law Act 1996, s 41 (which said that if a couple were not married then «the court [should] have regard to the fact that they have not given each other the commitment involved in marriage») has been repealed).

This month, the government began negotiations with the European Union to make sure that as Britain leaves the EU, a clear set of rules remain in place to ensure that whenever an issue of family law crosses borders, it's clear which courts will hear the case, and which country's law will be applied.

The Washington court found, inter alia, that Egyptian family courts apply specific Sharia law rules to child custody cases, under which a Muslim mother is disqualified from custody if she does not raise the child as a Muslim and / or if she does not comply with Muslim religious requirements or if she remarries or moves away from the father's domicile.

This is the underlying message in a recent post on Australian Family Law Blog which provides helpful hints on what to wear to court.

Collaborative Law is an alternative to family law litigation in which a mutually acceptable agreement is reached without going to couLaw is an alternative to family law litigation in which a mutually acceptable agreement is reached without going to coulaw litigation in which a mutually acceptable agreement is reached without going to court.

Because laws which are facially neutral may «unintentionally have a disproportionate or adverse effect on a group or individual» (at para 36), the Federal Court of Appeal proceeded, where the trial judge did not, to consider «whether the provisions of the ITA, while not directly discriminating on the basis of gender and family status, did so indirectly and unintentionally» (at para 36).

He currently serves as first vice president of the AAML's Pennsylvania chapter, and as co-chair of the national Practice & Technology Committee, as well as co-chair of the Amicus Committee, which advises the U.S. Supreme Court on family law issues.

The 2007 — 08 At a Glance — essential court tables for ancillary relief which you are hereby ordered ex parte to buy — has just been published for the Family Law Bar Association (FLBA) by Class Publishing at # 40 which, according to table 2, represents a rise over last year of in excess of the rate of inflation.

Family law is a unique species of civil law for many reasons, but primarily because of: the frequency with which disputes brought to court concern social, psychological and emotional issues rather than legal; the almost complete absence of circumstances in which a specific legal conclusion invariably and inevitably results from a particular set of facts; and, the range of other areas of the law that may be concurrently applicable, such as contracts, tax, conflicts, real property, negligence, torts and trusts.

With respect to disability payments, the court noted a previous decision, which stated, about disability payments in family law:

If one reads the comments on the Charleston Post and Courier's web site regarding the Judicial Merit Selection Commission's preliminary decision that Judge F.P. Segars - Andrews is unqualified to remain a family court judge because of her handling of a divorce case in which there was a business relationship between her husband's law partner and one -LSB-...]

Once that limitation period has been missed then, unless a Court agrees to extend it based on the common - law (which is difficult), no further claims can be made for the equalization of net family property.

David R. Brewer Attorney at Law, PLLC appears for clients in a wide variety of matters over which the Texas Probate and Family Courts have jurisdiction.

She has appeared in the following reported cases: S v S [2017] EWHC 1298 (Fam) involving a fact - finding about allegations of grave harm to the mother and the child and evidence from experts in Iranian family law; and Re: Rodwell [2016] EWHC 1731 (Fam), which centred on questions about whether the court had jurisdiction to make orders concerning the family.

How do you establish the extent to which the courts in another country will recognize and enforce foreign — and especially U.S. — judgments, particularly in the family law area?

Family law, sometimes known as «domestic law,» is a broad area of legal practice covering any situation in which family relationships must be formalized, regulated, monitored or dissolved by North Carolina's family cFamily law, sometimes known as «domestic law,» is a broad area of legal practice covering any situation in which family relationships must be formalized, regulated, monitored or dissolved by North Carolina's family cfamily relationships must be formalized, regulated, monitored or dissolved by North Carolina's family cfamily courts.

The just, speedy and inexpensive resolution of family law disputes should be the lens through which the rules of court are interpreted and applied.

The Institute of Family Law Arbitrators has a clearly defined process, which is endorsed by the courts in S v S [2014] EWHC 7 (Fam), [2014] All ER (D) 63 (Jan) as leading to a binding court order in almost all cases.

(b) if such an order is necessary to determine another family law dispute over which the Provincial Court has jurisdiction, the Provincial Court.

The Court began its analysis by noting that it has extensive remedial power to address contempt under Family Law Rule 31 (15), which provides:

Common law couples, in jurisdictions in which there is no unified family court, would apply to the provincial court in order to have their case heard.

My professional memberships include the Bar Association of Montgomery County, Maryland and its Family Law Section, of which I served as co-chair from 2013 - 2015; the Maryland State Bar Association; the Montgomery County Chapter of the Women's Bar Association, of which I served as President from 2015 - 2016; and the Inns of Court.

She has created FamilyWatch, a monthly digest of Ontario Court of Appeal child and family decisions, which is widely read among the family law bar.

Curran Law Office tried a case before the Juneau County Circuit Court (Judge Evenson) which resulted in the Court unequally dividing the marital estate in favor of the firm's client, allowing our client to retain a full interest in a family farm in Elroy.

Family law cases are usually reserved for state court, but increasingly, the federal courts have been used to decide child abduction cases, that is, whether the child should be returned to the country of habitual residence (see Habitual Residence), but not to decide which party wins custody.

In an important defence effort, LAWPRO counsel were successful in convincing a court to rule that a family law party could not look to the defendant solicitors for any shortfall with respect to damages and costs for which the other spouse was found to be liable.

The Family Court also properly ascertained that compliance with Domestic Relations Law § 75 - i was not feasible, as the laws and procedures to which the Israel Family Court must adhere prevent communication between the two courts.

From a theoretical / policy - based viewpoint, it perhaps stands in stark contrast to a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada a few weeks ago which ruled that under Quebec Family Law, it is not unconstitutional for common - law spouses to be given different rights from married couples in connection with certain specific rights arising from support upon separatiLaw, it is not unconstitutional for common - law spouses to be given different rights from married couples in connection with certain specific rights arising from support upon separatilaw spouses to be given different rights from married couples in connection with certain specific rights arising from support upon separation.

In Ontario family law, «Parenting Coordinators» are an increasingly - popular concept; a quick search for that term on CanLII, the Canadian Legal Information Institute's website containing court judgments from across Canada, shows almost 150 Ontario instances in which a judge has referenced that term, almost all within the past 5 years.

The court began by outlining that costs orders are governed by rule 24 of the Family Law Rules (FLR), which states that there is a presumption that the successful party is entitled to costs.

Another cutting - edge, growing family law trend, mediation is an alternative dispute resolution option in divorce in which the parties jointly hire a mediator to assist them in working out a mutually satisfactory agreement and avoid going to court.

CASES AND COURTS TO WHICH RULES APPLY (2) These rules apply to all family law cases in the Family Court of the Superior Court of Justice, in the Superior Court of Justice and in the Ontario Cofamily law cases in the Family Court of the Superior Court of Justice, in the Superior Court of Justice and in the Ontario CoFamily Court of the Superior Court of Justice, in the Superior Court of Justice and in the Ontario Court...

For the spouse who remains in the home, the obligation to pay occupation rent is usually imposed by a court pursuant to the Family Law Act, which authorizes it in the right circumstances, provided he or she has been awarded exclusive possession.

The Act creates a framework for collaborative family law, which is a private form of dispute resolution where attorneys focus solely on helping clients reach an out - of - court agreement.

There is a solid rationale for this approach in Canadian legislation given that both the Federal Divorce Act provisions (which detail how the court may determine «custody» and «access») and the Provincial Family Law Act provisions (which detail how the court may determine «guardianship», «parenting time», and «parenting responsibilities») explicitly refer to «children».

Speech by Sir James Munby (president of the family courts) to the Society of editors: - «I have said this many times in the past but it must never be forgotten that, with the state's abandonment of the right to impose capital sentences, orders of the kind which family judges are typically invited to make in public law proceedings are amongst the most drastic that any judge in any jurisdiction is ever empowered to make.

«One of the very first lawyers to try unbundling, Forrest S. Mosten, offers family - law clients a checklist of 16 services from which to choose, including factual investigation, discovery and advice on court appearances.

The court recently reviewed the factors that must be considered in determining which litigant in a family law proceeding should be awarded costs, and in what amount.

People often tell me they want a legal separation and usually they are referring to two things: one, what family law lawyers in the family courts consider being separated, which is also referred to as the date of separation; and two, a -LSB-...]

There are two statutes which provide the authority for courts to award spousal support: The Family Law Act, and the Divorce Act.