Sentences with phrase «family law disputes makes»

... in some parts of some provinces, namely Manitoba, New Brunswick, Newfoundland and Labrador, Prince Edward Island, Ontario and Saskatchewan, there is just one court for family law disputes Making matters worse, not all courts can deal with all laws and the two trial courts usually have different rules, different processes, different forms and different fee structures.

Not exact matches

On many points, decisions of Islamic religious courts have the force of national law (a touchy issue when a dispute involves a Muslim and a non-Muslim, or when one spouse in an existing marriage converts to Islam and makes the other members of the family subject to Shari'a determinations on matters such as child custody).

Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church, which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf of his family in the emergency; differences of opinion exist in the church on certain questions of morals or belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?

The Canadian Research Institute for Law and the Family has just released a new research report, An International Review of Early Neutral Evaluation Programs and Their Use in Family Law Disputes in Alberta, which includes a literature review of early neutral evaluation programs in Manitoba, Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia, Singapore, the United Kingdom and the United States, and makes recommendations about the implementation of such a program in Alberta.

Lawyers prefer to use alternative dispute resolution processes in family law, which cost the client less, take less time and make for longer - lasting co-operation between the parties after the fact, according to a recent study.

Family law clients often make their own problems and are unpredictable once a custody battle or other dispute gets underway.

Disputes over support obligations require both parties to comply with their disclosure obligations, since both the Family Law Act and the Federal Child Support Guidelines both require the court to make determinations about a person's income based on their tax information, but the Income Tax Act does not permit a court to obtain that information directly from Canada Revenue.

An offer to settle can be made to the opposing party in a family law dispute to settle all or an aspect of the case.

The first flowchart takes users through the opening steps in a family law case, including consideration of legal issues, as well as making a separation agreement and thinking about alternative dispute resolution.

Over the years, Ted has made numerous presentations to a variety of organizations such as at the Professional Development Program, Osgoode Hall Law School; McMaster University Social Work Department; and, has also been a part - time instructor in the Alternative Dispute Resolution Certificate Program at Mohawk College of Applied Arts and Technology and in the Family Law Course at McMaster University.

I envision that the Act will lead professionals who work with families to achieve the goals of this Act which include: • to encourage parties to a family law dispute to resolve the dispute through agreements and appropriate family dispute resolution before making an application to a court; and

In an effort to make family law less stressful for both herself and her clients, Beth has supported and promoted alternate dispute resolution for many years.

Marla Gilsig: «In British Columbia on March 18, 2013 we will have a new Family Law Act which makes resolution out of court the preferred method for resolving family disFamily Law Act which makes resolution out of court the preferred method for resolving family disfamily disputes.

The best interests of the child principle is most before the courts in a custody or access dispute, but in reality this principle impacts several areas of family law, and will be considered by the courts when making any order that pertains to a child.

Purposes of Part 4 The purposes of this Part are as follows: (a) to ensure that parties to a family law dispute are informed of the various methods available to resolve the dispute; (b) to encourage parties to a family law dispute to resolve the dispute through agreements and appropriate family dispute resolution before making an application to a court; (c) to encourage parents and guardians to (i) resolve conflict other than through court intervention, and (ii) create parenting arrangements and arrangements respecting contact with a child that is in the best interests of the child.

Arbitration — using a private person (often a lawyer) to make a legally - binding decision about your family law dispute;

The report makes a number of recommendations for further research to explore: the qualitative difference between assessments conducted by psychologists and psychiatrists compared to social workers and their impact on the settlement of family law disputes; the utility and feasibility of establishing standard guidelines or best practices for parenting assessments; and, options for shielding assessors from the damaging impact of unmeritorious complaints.

In 1999, after five years acting for the public in civil litigation and disputes, Stephen made the change to family law as he had the desire to make a significant difference to people's lives.

Collaborative Practice offers clients a way to resolve all aspects of their family law dispute respectfully, with confidentiality and dignity, while keeping decision - making between the clients.

If all the parties to a family law dispute are from one country and are living in that country then generally the dispute is heard by the courts of that country and a decision is made and implemented in accordance with the laws of that country.

Clients who make use of our firm for limited services find that they can resolve important family law disputes with much the same certainty as if they had retained our firm for comprehensive litigation services.

(2) The dispute resolution provisions of the Family Law Rules 2004 impose the requirements for dispute resolution that must be complied with before an application is made to the Family Court of Australia for a parenting order.

With regard to family law, although going to court to resolve disputes about children should be the last resort, the proposed legislative changes in this Bill make clear that parents should work together to reach agreements about their child's care when they separate.

FAMILY LAW — APPEAL — INTERIM PARENTING — Where there is nothing anomalous about the primary judge finding, by virtue of s 61DA (3) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismFAMILY LAW — APPEAL — INTERIM PARENTING — Where there is nothing anomalous about the primary judge finding, by virtue of s 61DA (3) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismissLAW — APPEAL — INTERIM PARENTING — Where there is nothing anomalous about the primary judge finding, by virtue of s 61DA (3) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismFamily Law Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismissLaw Act 1975 (Cth)(«the Act»), that it would «not be appropriate» to apply the presumption in favour of equal shared parental responsibility, while going on to make an order for equal shared parental responsibility ¬ Where it can be seen that the primary judge addressed what was necessary from s 65DAA of the Act, given the parameters of the dispute, and how the parties» respective cases were presented — Where the primary judge adequately and appropriately considered what she is obliged to in determining where the best interests of the children lie, bearing in mind that that consideration is framed by the parameters of the issues in dispute, and how each party has presented their case — Where there is no merit in the grounds of appeal ¬ Appeal dismissed.

Unless an exemption applies, the law requires separating families who have a dispute about children to make a genuine effort to try to sort it out through family dispute resolution before filing an application for parenting orders in Court.

The law requires separating families who have a dispute about children to make a genuine effort to try to come to an agreement through FDR before filing an application for Parenting Orders in court.

Families with disputes about the future arrangements for their children must make a genuine effort to resolve the matter by Family Dispute Resolution before applying to a family law court, except in some circumstFamily Dispute Resolution before applying to a family law court, except in some circumstfamily law court, except in some circumstances.

The mediator keeps the parties focused on the issues being discussed and makes sure they address all of the issues which require resolution in their dispute (divorce or other family law matter).

Some states and countries have already changed the family court laws to make meditation mandatory for certain types of family issues or disputes.

Mediation will make the divorce process quicker, fairer and more empowering for both parties, says a family law expert at Manchester - based Kuits Solicitors today to mark the beginning of Family Dispute Resolutionfamily law expert at Manchester - based Kuits Solicitors today to mark the beginning of Family Dispute ResolutionFamily Dispute Resolution Week.

Appointing counsel to represent a child in a family law dispute can make an already contentious situation worse, Toronto family lawyer Brian Ludmer tells AdvocateDaily.com.

Before we embark on explaining the California Family Law Court system, we want to make sure you know that going to court is not the only way to solve family law disFamily Law Court system, we want to make sure you know that going to court is not the only way to solve family law disputLaw Court system, we want to make sure you know that going to court is not the only way to solve family law disfamily law disputlaw disputes.

e want to make sure you know that going to court is not the only way to solve family law disputes.

The progress made in recent years in alternative dispute resolution and, particularly, collaborative practice, has induced me to return to California and resume the practice of family law, from which I have been absent for a number of years.