While controlling for location, gender, and ethnicity, regression analyses showed that
family sanctions against smoking cigarettes and marijuana explained a modest proportion of the variance in substance use.
Not exact matches
Article 11 (2) In order to prevent discrimination
against women on the grounds of marriage or maternity and to ensure their effective right to work, States Parties shall take appropriate measures: (a) To prohibit, subject to the imposition of
sanctions, dismissal on the grounds of pregnancy or maternity leave and discrimination in dismissals on the basis of marital status; (b) To introduce maternity leave with pay or with comparable social benefits without loss of former employment, seniority or social allowances; (c) To encourage the provision of necessary supporting social services to enable parents to combine
family obligations with work responsibilities and participation in public life
(iii)(Wellington case): Special Investigation Unit's duty to investigate police action (whether or not a «crime») in a way that produces evidence that can be used by the person, or
family of the person, harmed by the police in a civil action
against the police (or possibly that results in some kind of legal
sanction against the police involved.)
1 Mar. 12, 2018 partially published; fee discussion published; other parts of opinion modified Mar. 27, 2018), the 4/1 DCA decided that a trial judge did not err in ordering that
Family Code section 271
sanctions against an ex-wife could be paid for by ex-husband's deduction of the
sanctions from the variable component of his spousal support obligations (in this case, future bonus payments).
3 Feb. 8, 2018)(unpublished) was a situation where the
family law judge awarded $ 15,000 in Family Code section 271 sanctions against both former spouses but also denied ex-wife's request for $ 50,000 in «needs - based» fees under Family Code sections 2030
family law judge awarded $ 15,000 in
Family Code section 271 sanctions against both former spouses but also denied ex-wife's request for $ 50,000 in «needs - based» fees under Family Code sections 2030
Family Code section 271
sanctions against both former spouses but also denied ex-wife's request for $ 50,000 in «needs - based» fees under
Family Code sections 2030
Family Code sections 2030/2032.
Individuals who go
against family norms may experience the resistance you mentioned, also referred to as negative
sanctions (e.g., withholding support and / or monetary assistance; making inappropriate comments, etc.).