Sentences with phrase «far as answering»

For some it goes so far as answering calls during sex, or texting while driving — a fatal hazard!

As far as answering phones, the sample uses that point to mention how she has a friendly speaking voice, which gives the hiring manager a sense of her personality.

(iii) In so far as the answer to (ii) requires that EU trade mark court to identify whether the undertaking has taken active steps in Member State B, which criteria are to be taken into account in determining whether the undertaking has taken such active steps?»

Not exact matches

«As far as empaths are concerned, where a problem is, so too is the answeAs far as empaths are concerned, where a problem is, so too is the answeas empaths are concerned, where a problem is, so too is the answer.

And as author David Rock observes in his book Quiet Leadership, advice can be challenged and debated; that's far harder when people reach a conclusion based on their own answers to open - ended questions.

You can generally answer questions far better in person than including them in your plan, as you can adjust based on follow - up questions and / or the investor's body language and tone.

The Joint Review Panel was not as definitiive — it found that, «further scientific research would be needed for definitive answers,» and has required the Northern Gateway to complete that work.

Poloz answered questions from MPs as he presented his economic outlook and envisioned a sequence of events that would lead the country on a path to further prosperity.

Another option: The Intelligent Office, a national franchise based in Boulder, Colorado, provides small - business owners with a prestigious address for meetings, as well as phone - answering and mail services, all for about $ 275 a month — far less than the rate for commercial space.

And, so far as we've been able to tell, no CEO (or consultant) has the answer to compensation, because of all the variables — the industry, the company culture, the type of salesperson, the customer mix, the role of service and support people, and so on.

Well, even after 16 years as an entrepreneur, «no» is a far more common answer than «yes.»

Analysis of their answers yielded 33 possible traits that help make a leader inspiring, but one characteristic stood out as the most important by far.

As far as your equity position is concerned, I am sure that you will present a take it or leave it offer, but I will answer the question anywaAs far as your equity position is concerned, I am sure that you will present a take it or leave it offer, but I will answer the question anywaas your equity position is concerned, I am sure that you will present a take it or leave it offer, but I will answer the question anyway.

If the answer is that production will increase irrespective of new market access or increased pipeline capacity then assessing GHGs does not seem necessary (though not harmful and probably useful, as further discussed below).

When asked about Bitcoin's potential, Kelly answered that while he used to see crypto as comparable to the Internet in 1995, he now understands that a better comparison is further back:

Actually, other Robert, your post is complete bullshit as far as being proof of god answering any request.

I will be the first to admit, as you should, that I do not know all of the answers, but I think the journey of trying to discover them is far more fascinating than saying «well god did it, so thats it».

As we have developed as a species, we have gained the ability to further research and in so many cases that research leads to answerAs we have developed as a species, we have gained the ability to further research and in so many cases that research leads to answeras a species, we have gained the ability to further research and in so many cases that research leads to answers.

He was unsatisfied with the reception to Paul VI's Humanae Vitae of 1968, and unsatisfied, too, with the state of the argument in the Church, thinking that it did not go as far as it could in answering certain basic puzzlements that humans have about themselves.

5oo, ooo priests for 1.2 billion Catholics - There is the answer to why the abusing priests were tolerated.The conclave elected exactly who they wanted to be Pope - Someone who would not rock the boat.I believe Pope Benedict was advised to retire in light of the Federal indictment pending so this would not involve a standing Pope and the possiblity of him being found guilty.I further think this new election of Pope will allow the Church to change it's stance on the very controvertial issues the Church is facing ie.female priests being one, the decisions appearing more acceptable coming from a new head as opposed to reversed stance of standing Pope.This decision to retire, in the Churchs» view I believe is damage control and not neccessarily Pope Benedict's desire.If looked at for what it is - A very slick maneuver indeed.

At this point as far as the earth is round question we consider that answer so refined and mounted in evidence that we can say it is indeed a fact at this point and will never change until an event takes place that actually changes it shape.

The answer is that Stephen is referring to Terah becoming «dead» as far as God's will for his life was concerned.

If the Lord is very intentional in His Word as far as communicating a message to mankind, then there must be one correct answer to every doctrinal and interpretive issue.

The answer to this question can not be found, as is so often claimed, in the inadequacies of the preacher so far as his rhetorical skill, his use of apt illustrations, his logical development of theme, and so forth are in view.

Concerning matters not explicitly clear in the Qur» an, the Sunnah is the secondary, supplementary source; and when the answer to questions needs further clarification the third source for Muslims is reasoning about the intent of the Qur» an and Sunnah by those men who are recognized as having the training and experience which qualifies them to reason properly.

And if, as I believe, a major factor is our answer to the further question, «What essentially is the gospel?»

Just as earlier the official Church could not and would not give any authoritative answer to someone about their choice of a profession, even though it could be a moral question of importance for salvation, so today and tomorrow the Church in many questions, even those of public interest and far - reaching importance, will not, even ratione peccati, be able to give a specific answer officially and directly.

The orthodox answer, as we know, is that these phenomena simply give further evidence of the fundamentally racist character of the American polity.

Hartshorne, I think, can not answer such questions and admits as much in a statement, which, though parenthetical to the prior statements I have cited, indicates just how far we are from an analytically clear understanding of divine knowledge: «If this [knowing fear without being afraid] is a paradox so is any idea of adequate knowledge» (CSPM 263).

If someone can not further explain an answer without being accused of attempting to change their «wrong» answer (in your view) without admitting mistake then I guess you hold people to an impossibly high standard and as you say «one that you can not keep yourself.»

While insisting that one can not speak of politics without also speaking of power, we have nonetheless thus far not answered the question as to whether love and power are compatible.

Certainly, there are some questions that science is unable to answer as of now (although the reach of science is far greater than what you might think, and includes feelings and beliefs).

As far as my research shows the number of claimed answered prayers is almost exactly the same no matter which religion you profess and no matter which God you implorAs far as my research shows the number of claimed answered prayers is almost exactly the same no matter which religion you profess and no matter which God you imploras my research shows the number of claimed answered prayers is almost exactly the same no matter which religion you profess and no matter which God you implore.

But part of the answer may be his sense of private language, as reflected in his longest poem by far, «The Secret Language of Women,» about the Chinese women who found a way to communicate with their sisters in spite of the Maoist revolution and all the powers of earth.

You raised some genetic doubts about that process and I can't answer that (so far) as I don't have the knowledge, so I don't know if they are right or wrong.

There is no answer as to what actually happened, but we do know that starting from there the church embarked on the far - reaching intellectual enterprise which is the building of a Christian theology, and philosophy of life, upon the foundation thus laid, and that is an unfinished story.

A Yes answer to any of these questions brought further questioning as to whether the person responding thought his or her judgment or impartiality would be clouded by the circumstances.

I agree that tyhose who lived two thousand years may have come up with some far out ways to address the big questions we still can not answer such as how something came from nothing - George Gamow and his big bang 1500 years from now may very well seem just as stupid.

As far as attending the marriage ceremony of gay people i have two points of view the first is that that is there choice to live how they want to but to me that is clearly not Gods best and sin is sin and needs to be repented of but that is my standard not theres.As far as divorced people remarrying why shouldnt they if they have repented of there past God forgives them not condemns them.As he said to the women caught in adultery do they condemn you and she answers no and he says and neither do i.Go and sin no more.This was not just for the women causght in adultery this lesson was for every one of us he was addressing our sin publically for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God that being his son Jesus Christ he is telling us that we must make the same decision to go and sin no more to repent in our hearts and the only way to do that is to give our hearts and lives totally to Jesus Christ other wise we are no better than the hypocrites in JESUS day.brentAs far as attending the marriage ceremony of gay people i have two points of view the first is that that is there choice to live how they want to but to me that is clearly not Gods best and sin is sin and needs to be repented of but that is my standard not theres.As far as divorced people remarrying why shouldnt they if they have repented of there past God forgives them not condemns them.As he said to the women caught in adultery do they condemn you and she answers no and he says and neither do i.Go and sin no more.This was not just for the women causght in adultery this lesson was for every one of us he was addressing our sin publically for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God that being his son Jesus Christ he is telling us that we must make the same decision to go and sin no more to repent in our hearts and the only way to do that is to give our hearts and lives totally to Jesus Christ other wise we are no better than the hypocrites in JESUS day.brentas attending the marriage ceremony of gay people i have two points of view the first is that that is there choice to live how they want to but to me that is clearly not Gods best and sin is sin and needs to be repented of but that is my standard not theres.As far as divorced people remarrying why shouldnt they if they have repented of there past God forgives them not condemns them.As he said to the women caught in adultery do they condemn you and she answers no and he says and neither do i.Go and sin no more.This was not just for the women causght in adultery this lesson was for every one of us he was addressing our sin publically for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God that being his son Jesus Christ he is telling us that we must make the same decision to go and sin no more to repent in our hearts and the only way to do that is to give our hearts and lives totally to Jesus Christ other wise we are no better than the hypocrites in JESUS day.brentAs far as divorced people remarrying why shouldnt they if they have repented of there past God forgives them not condemns them.As he said to the women caught in adultery do they condemn you and she answers no and he says and neither do i.Go and sin no more.This was not just for the women causght in adultery this lesson was for every one of us he was addressing our sin publically for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God that being his son Jesus Christ he is telling us that we must make the same decision to go and sin no more to repent in our hearts and the only way to do that is to give our hearts and lives totally to Jesus Christ other wise we are no better than the hypocrites in JESUS day.brentas divorced people remarrying why shouldnt they if they have repented of there past God forgives them not condemns them.As he said to the women caught in adultery do they condemn you and she answers no and he says and neither do i.Go and sin no more.This was not just for the women causght in adultery this lesson was for every one of us he was addressing our sin publically for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God that being his son Jesus Christ he is telling us that we must make the same decision to go and sin no more to repent in our hearts and the only way to do that is to give our hearts and lives totally to Jesus Christ other wise we are no better than the hypocrites in JESUS day.brentAs he said to the women caught in adultery do they condemn you and she answers no and he says and neither do i.Go and sin no more.This was not just for the women causght in adultery this lesson was for every one of us he was addressing our sin publically for all have sinned and fall short of the Glory of God that being his son Jesus Christ he is telling us that we must make the same decision to go and sin no more to repent in our hearts and the only way to do that is to give our hearts and lives totally to Jesus Christ other wise we are no better than the hypocrites in JESUS day.brentnz

The Cultural Dimension As culture develops, so too will religion in order that it may answer more adequately the basic problems of human life and to further deepen the synthesis of scientific knowledge with religious knowledge - the principle of evolution is written into the nature of religion, as in all lifAs culture develops, so too will religion in order that it may answer more adequately the basic problems of human life and to further deepen the synthesis of scientific knowledge with religious knowledge - the principle of evolution is written into the nature of religion, as in all lifas in all life.

I don't see it as fence sitting simply because the questions our wonderful minds are able to conjur up are far to big for those very minds to answer.

The only thing, as far as I am concerned, that keeps us permanent is our belief in the value of goodness, and how we translate that into daily action, even across the boundaries of race, gender, class, and creed... That is real permanence precisely because it does not, as a form of consciousness, submit to dogma that, with the way reality and history simply IS, or plays out, CAN NEVER give us all the answers...

Most diverse and conflicting answers have been given to this question, thereby showing that no answer so far can be accepted as final and complete.

There is a gargantuan literature on this question, but no rationally satisfactory answer so far as I can tell.

So far as this goes, then, it indicates that Israel's answer was in freeing God of the limitations of fixed abode: He could leave his house and go where necessity of whatever sort called him.

The story of the flight into Egypt by Joseph, Mary and the infant Jesus may have originated as a midrash inspired from the text by Hosea, «1 called my son out of Egypt».11 If the story of the burial by Joseph of Arimathea owes anything at all to the influence of such a verse as Isaiah 53:9, then it would be a further example of the midrashic study of the Bible as a method of answering current problems.

The reason charities are not under as much scrutiny is because they have FAR FEWER to answer to.

These are manifestly questions of historical fact, and one does not see how the answer to them can decide offhand the still further question: of what use should such a volume, with its manner of coming into existence so defined, be to us as a guide to life and a revelation?

Talk of the ways of spreading a wholesome Conservatism throughout this country: give painful lectures, distribute weary tracts (and perhaps this is as well — you may be able to give an argumentative answer to a few objections, you may diffuse a distinct notion of the dignified dullness of politics); but as far as communicating and establishing your creed are concerned — try a little pleasure.

Please look at websites such as chabad.org or askmoses.com for answers to any further questions you may have.