As
far as reviewers being «idiotic, boorish, curmudgeon»... If you're so certain we're all like this, then why are you reading any of us?
The answer, as
far as this reviewer is concerned, has to be a resounding no.
Not exact matches
Tech
reviewer Jared Newman went so
far as to declare 2017 the «Year of the Flawed Flagship Phone.»
This is due to readers enjoying one book and going to another
as well
as publishers,
reviewers, and retailers
further promoting your slew of publishing.
One
reviewer went so
far as to say it saved her relationship with her snoring husband.
One
reviewer said he wishes the colors were brighter, but
as far as quality and performance of this stroller, there isn't anything yet.
Some
reviewers said that they would have liked an even better video quality,
as far as resolution is concerned.
The
reviewer wrote, «[i] t would probably... be beneficial to find one or two male biologists to work with (or at least obtain internal peer review from, but better yet
as active co-authors)» to prevent the manuscript from «drifting too
far away from empirical evidence into ideologically biased assumptions.»
Reviewers as a group find the HD graphics equal to those of the PS3 and Xbox 360, but don't expect visuals superior to those competitors;
as Ars Technica writes, «If the Wii U is capable of generating graphics more detailed than those of other current systems, the launch games I've seen so
far don't do a great job showing that off.»
While I didn't hate this game
as much
as some of the
reviewers did (I think IGN's 1.5 may be a little harsh), it is definitely
far from a good game.
So
far, many
reviewers have praised the look of the movie, which stars actress Mia Wasikowska
as author Edith Cushing and Tom Hiddleston and Jessica Chastain
as Edith's new husband and sister - in - law, respectively.
As a
reviewer for the NGLC secondary school models, which seeks to not just fund those schools using online learning but those really taking their approach the extra mile with innovative, push - the - envelope student - centric designs, I have been struck
further by how much blended learning has arrived.
«Dede has gone
far beyond any expectations of an academic journal
reviewer in terms of number of timely reviews completed, depth of understanding of the field of research exhibited, and a compassionate voice so necessary in mentoring emerging scholars
as authors,» it read.
Despite his solid Minnesota credentials, Pearlstein comes out of
Far Rockaway High School in Queens, New York, whose decline from a nurturer of future Nobel prizewinners, furnishes much of the background to his distress over American education (
as the decline of so many other once - great New York City high schools serves so many others, including this
reviewer).
It's a car that is so
far ahead of the previous generation 6 — still a decent car in its own right — that you will be amazed,
as the
reviewer was.
That's the basis of my job
as an auto
reviewer, but of course that's just the cool part, and there's
far more to it than that.
Still, Mercedes - Benz seems to have gotten it wrong with the audio controls
as far as this automotive
reviewer is concerned.
As a busy book
reviewer, I enjoy reading other people's reviews, which often say
far more about the
reviewer than the book, if you read between the lines.
Unfortunately,
far too many self - published books that I see (
as a
reviewer and editor, I see a lot of them) simply would never ever be published by anyone BUT the author.
Some
reviewers feel that Ananka (who narrates the story some years later) is a little too smug for her own good and that Kiki's motivations are not
as wholesome
as they might be; but, overall, most critics and readers look forward to
further adventures from this band of strong, street wise, girls who show that girl power rules and it's cool to be clever.
The Kobo Vox eReader, which officially began shipping on October 28th (although
as far as I can tell, no
reviewers have actually received the device), is also offering 8 GB of storage together with an SD card slot and a slower 800 MHz processor with 512 MB RAM.
To go so
far (
as some
reviewers did) and say that the book was wholly unedited would be horrifically unfair, but there may have been too much liberty taken with the writing style, allowing a fragmented and disjointed style to run roughshod over what is a compelling story.
One
reviewer went
as far to say that, if nothing else, you should buy the book just for the cover art.
I'm a book
reviewer myself and so I do understand that there are only so many hours in the day but I've tried to cultivate friendships with fellow (I use the term loosely) literary novelists hoping they might consider reviewing my books and all bar one begged off playing the Beckett card (
as one put it, she would find it «very difficult to appreciate all the nuances of [the] book») and that left me with my fellow (again, I use the term loosely) self - publishers all of whom (so
far) have run screaming for the hills.
I fear however that that day, given
reviewers unwillingness to distance themselves from traditional big publishers
as you so rightly pointed out, is rather
far off into the future!
Harry Hansen, then book editor of The New York World - Telegram, reached back
far before Cowley's limit of the last few years and recalled what must have been favorites from his first decade
as a book
reviewer at the turn of the 20th century.
Hollis shares them with a fairy - tale charm, says
reviewer Anne Bartlett, even going so
far as to begin «most of his chapters with «Once upon a time.»»
The population of eBook readers is huge and there will be an ample number of
reviewers who are worth
far more to you than casual acquaintances that you meet, your friends, your family or even those anonymous people who work
as book
reviewers for major newspapers and magazines.
This Dystopian Thriller has a «Touch of Romance» and
reviewers say «we get to see love in action,
as we learn just how
far Kelsey and Luke are willing to go for each other».
If I were in your position, I wouldn't go
as far as asking other bloggers /
reviewers to ignore this author.
On one side are the Mean Girl
reviewers (sadly, most seem to be female) who make sport of posting derisive reviews, some going so
far as to slam the author's character and integrity.
My first thought was why would someone support a groups of author when there is a miniscule possibility that if they don't like the book and state that in a review, they will be stalked, even going
as far as stalking the
reviewer on Twitter, and bullied until they take the review down.
As a
reviewer for the Awesome Indies, I
far too often face the consequences of self - published authors who have for some reason thought that they can produce a book without going through the process that is basic to publishing ie editing.
Destiny also received critical acclaim that only became more positive
as the game was gradually expanded; receiving BAFTA Best Game of 2014 at the British Academy Video Games Awards, while
further awards highlighted quality within its nuances including the 2014 National Academy of Video Game Trade
Reviewers (NAVGTR) that awarded Destiny with Control Precision, Original Dramatic Score in a New IP and Use of Sound in a New IP, alongside numerous nominations.
Reviewers as a group find the HD graphics equal to those of the PS3 and Xbox 360, but don't expect visuals superior to those competitors;
as Ars Technica writes, «If the Wii U is capable of generating graphics more detailed than those of other current systems, the launch games I've seen so
far don't do a great job showing that off.»
I've heard other
reviewers refer to amiibo Festival
as like a version of Candy Land, and that's not
far off in regards to skill.
You might have read in other reviews about the game's increased challenge; some
reviewers have gone so
far as to say that «the majority of Wii's audience» won't be able to beat it.
Reviewer James B. Townsend, the magazine's publisher, accurately predicted that the exhibition, staged at New York's 69th Regiment Armory and later known
as the Armory Show, would have
far - reaching consequences.
Ian McEwan also added a scientific paper to his excellent novel Enduring Love, claiming the novel was based on it — only a year later did he admit that he had also written the «scientific paper» himself, even going
as far as submitting it to a journal (where one of the
reviewers smelt a rat).
People who actually are involved in the controversy [Steve M., Holland, Willis E., etc on one side, Jones, Mann, Briffa, etc, on the other] Involvement might be because of FOI requests or involvement
as an IPCC
FAR chapter
reviewer.
As to the peer -
reviewers and peer - review process I think that the exercise so
far has amply demonstrated how laughably inadequate it is.
As far as quantifying the UHI and adjustments component, the reviewer made us take it out as only an estimat
As far as quantifying the UHI and adjustments component, the reviewer made us take it out as only an estimat
as quantifying the UHI and adjustments component, the
reviewer made us take it out
as only an estimat
as only an estimate.
If there is
further evidence that you can not accept them, or if your intent is to use your access to the review process to challenge them, then we will not be able to continue to treat you
as an expert
reviewer for the IPCC.
Maybe, in so
far as much of this is already «known» such a result was not worth publishing, but for
reviewers to dismiss it for political reasons is disturbing.
imagine for a moment you've been teleported to a parallel universe where powerful interests and ideologues wouldn't be out to game such a system from day one to
further their myopic interests,
as they without question would (look at the
reviewer comments on ipcc drafts by denialists for a mere inkling - that's the effort that goes into something that has little to no bearing on anything):
[Response:
As I have stated before, these papers demonstrate only that if you are persistent enough you can get anything published — you just need to go
further and
further afield until you get
reviewers who don't know enough about the domain to realise what's wrong.
It
further sets off locally published journals, reducing their ability to attract submissions and
reviewers,
as it reinforces the «value» of US - European journals, putting pressure on research agendas in relation to the interests of those titles.
«We didn't like»... right, no bias there, when the Galaxy Tab S was widely considered by most
reviewers as the best tablet in it's price range and many considered it the outright best Android tablet period and it DEFINITIVELY had by
far the best tablet screen, bar none, including Apple, and you didn't even give it it's own paragraph.
I'm not going to go
as far as other
reviewers and say, «I don't even notice it,» because you would have to be blind to not notice it.
Further, it's highly likely that reviews on the app would trigger intense reactions, and that «could make the problems we've seen on Yelp — such
as lawsuits brought by subjects against
reviewers — look trivial by comparison,» he told TechNewsWorld.