Sentences with phrase «far as your argument»

As far as this argument with Brock and Vince think it has to do with busting Roman open.
As far as your argument for people saying its transformative, look up the word in the dictionary.
As far as the argument that the airline credit isn't really an annual fee offset — I get it.
for beating you into submissio while praising Arkham's 8 repetitive and impractical AR gliding missions was unnecessary and ends the article on a whimper as far as arguments for GOTY go.
As far as the argument that a Wii version would have compromised the other versions....
That should do it, as far as argument by assertion is concerned.

Not exact matches

The decision to ban people from seven - Muslim majority countries to enter the United States will give further arguments to extremist groups, such as the Islamic State, and will not guarantee national secutiry.
As far as which company has been more important, it wouldn't be as straightforward an argument as Jesse suggestAs far as which company has been more important, it wouldn't be as straightforward an argument as Jesse suggestas which company has been more important, it wouldn't be as straightforward an argument as Jesse suggestas straightforward an argument as Jesse suggestas Jesse suggests.
DUBNER: So, to summarize your overall argument about our rise and fall of American growth: would it be an overstatement to say that there was a lot of low - hanging fruit — physical and labor, and all other kinds of fruit that we picked beautifully and ate hungrily, and we did really well with — and that those things, once used up, that kind of gain will never appear again as far as you can see?
Is an increase from 2.6 % of GDP in 1981 to 3.1 % of GDP in 2012 unsustainable?  Yes, I suppose so, if this rate of increase continues for another few centuries. The same argument the CFIB makes for municipal spending could be made for corporate profits but far moreso. After adjusting for inflation, corporate profits have increased by 245 % since 1992, doubling as a share of GDP and growing at a rate of ten times Canadaâ $ ™ s cumulative population growth of just 23 % since 1992.
Nevertheless, there were numerous critics expressing worries about the growth of margin lending, but the financial press tended to play their arguments down, even going as far as charging the critics with trying to undermine confidence for ulterior reasons (Barron's and the Wall Street Journal both published editorials to that effect).
So as far as great fiction is concerned, you have no argument from me.
As far as omniscience being incompatible with omnipotence, I'm not really clear on what your argument was therAs far as omniscience being incompatible with omnipotence, I'm not really clear on what your argument was theras omniscience being incompatible with omnipotence, I'm not really clear on what your argument was there.
But as far as I'm concerned I just made an argument based on the premise of invisible yellow howling mute amphibian tree monkeys, so this isn't a line of debate I plan to carry on too long.
He was unsatisfied with the reception to Paul VI's Humanae Vitae of 1968, and unsatisfied, too, with the state of the argument in the Church, thinking that it did not go as far as it could in answering certain basic puzzlements that humans have about themselves.
Therefore, to be fair, as far as logic goes both camps (aetheists and theists) have equally unsupportable arguments.
Further, again, the Author of this article (after whose viewpoint I structured my argument) also takes the much more strict interpretation as described.
Although I can not agree with the details of Kreitzer's argument, in general terms such a position is plausible, as far as it goes, but it does not go very far.
as far as IM concerned topher is nOT doing it so he can fell better.your argument does NOT support your response (topher only does it dso he can feel better about himself) Topher beliecves strongly the prayer works regardless of what YOU think ok?
I would go so far as to say that their argument was far stronger then.
I know how that rock was formed... no designer required... so your ENTIRE argument disappears since EVERYTHING was not designed... as far as any can see.
But Duffy never wanders too far from this one persistent argument» that much of the vitality and resiliency of Catholicism is found in its rituals and worship, in lay devotions and Marian piety, in veneration of the Church's blesseds and saints, in acts of communal discipline and obedience that bind the faithful together as a living organism.
It may indeed seem that what I have done so far is to offer a tentative argument against the claims of an exemplarist interpretation of Christ's work, namely, that if he is offered us as an exemplar his experience is in crucial respects too relative and limited to offer a wholly significant guide - post to men and women in all the circumstances of their lives.
Of course, if you believe as many do that these words were actually inspired by God, then this argument could be taken even further.
Just as the book powerfully exposes the myth that acceptance of gay marriage would have no significant social consequences, so too the authors could have made the further argument that, to varying degrees, all sexual unions outside marriage (as traditionally understood) are harmful to society.
So far as it goes, this is an acceptable argument.
Far from dismissing as politically irresponsible John Howard Yoder's argument that the first task of the church is to be itself, I see that statement as a call to redefine the political from the perspective of Christ's kingdom.
First he attempted to apply a logical argument, whose history extends back at least as far as Cicero's On Divination.4 According to this view, contingency (chance) and foreknowledge (fate) are contradictory assertions because a contingent event, being unnecessitated, can not be known until it occurs.
Being «offensive» is typically not a good argument as far as law, otherwise, I would attempt to make laws that make radicalized ignorant christian zealots such as you, as «hate» groups.
Trump's detractors may well have the better of that argument as far as economistic thought goes.
2 The other principal factors, as far as I can judge, are Zeno's arguments (PR 68-70/106 -08), and the tendency in modern science to view nature in terms of quanta (SMW, Ch.
But as a further argument, even among Christian denominations, there is wide divergence in how God should be worshiped.
The oral argument defense of Obamacare's constitutionality so far has not just been bad, as has been reported, but has been stunningly bad.
I wish he had developed that argument further since, as it stands, I do not follow it.
As it happens, both Charmley and Schlesinger are playing «what if,» and in our judgment Schlesinger has by far the better of the argument.
They sound primitive, but we had best not assume the hypothesis as proved and make it the basis of further argument or additional hypothesis.
One of the arguments that the «Christian nationalists» always make is that the country was founded on Christian principles, when in fact many of the founders held beliefs that were about as far from any Christian orthodoxy as you could safely be back in those days.
Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, and Al Gore were all once pro-life, and Jesse Jackson even went so far as to argue that the privacy argument in Roe was «the premise of slavery.»
Further, reducing all marriages to civil unions by recognizing marriages as business contracts removes the argument from debate by recognizing equality for all regardless of their beliefs.
The argument against christians, as far as I'm concerned, is one that needs to be made in the context of cultural development.
Justice Alito has gone so far as to note that those arguments, moral and empirical, have been made.
To recap the argument as a whole: Having begun with mutually corroborating individual and communal appeals to experience to establish what he takes to be a fact, namely, that our twofold noetic experience of ourselves and others is valuational, Ogden then argues for a further noetic sense of an encompassing whole in addition to such a twofold sense of the worth of self and others.25 Finally, he argues in correlational fashion that such a threefold noetic experience of valuation presupposes as the condition of its possibility an ontic whole to be experienced.
So essentially this is a forum for atheist trolls to pick arguments that have already been stated and nothing more as far as content.
But your argument and examples stayed with me — they «provoked some thought,» as you had hoped — and suggested some further views that I hope you will entertain.
«You can't prove God doesn't exist» is not a convincing argument to us, as in inability to disprove something is a far cry from it being true.
Further than this we can not see and our argument must cease — except, as I have now to show, in the case of the Christian, who, drawing upon an added source of knowledge, may advance yet another step.
It seems that there are further basic arguments which Hartshorne could level against Craighead's claim, charging, for example, that it is a fallacy of composition to assert that because we can conceive of the nonexistence of some things we can conceive of the nonexistence of all things.4 Craighead has in fact anticipated that fallacy charge as it applies in this issue (ECCC 122f).
So far as I am aware, process thinkers have not critiqued the traditional Islamic doctrines of God; but the process arguments would seem to be far more devastating when applied, say; to the «occasionalism» of al - Ashari's doctrine of divine power than to the Augustinian or Thomistic notions of God.
As far as evidence of damage from Reparative Therapy, please study the arguments presented in the State of California, or contact those that claim to have been damaged by Reparative Therapy... hear their voices, JeremAs far as evidence of damage from Reparative Therapy, please study the arguments presented in the State of California, or contact those that claim to have been damaged by Reparative Therapy... hear their voices, Jeremas evidence of damage from Reparative Therapy, please study the arguments presented in the State of California, or contact those that claim to have been damaged by Reparative Therapy... hear their voices, Jeremy.
And since Stapp has provided no further arguments for the meaningfulness of the joint class A, B, C, and D or for the propriety of treating the four equations relating the four sets of spin - value products as simultaneous equations, one can only conclude that both of these matters stand in need of considerable clarification and that any philosophical claims which depend upon the conclusion reached in Stapp's proof are in jeopardy.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z