Wilshere could be sold for a huge amount (we could get between 30m - 50m for him) and be replaced with a better midfielder who is
far less injury prone and actually make a decent contribution to the team and its goals.
But he is also
far less injury prone and thus ready to play more.
they were
far lesser injuries than if they fought.
Not exact matches
But to answer your question... There are and were
injuries to two starters in this loosing period, Lillard was out one game due to his son's birth and tweaked his ankle upon return, he has looked
less the 100 % on some nights ever since and is
far from that MVP candidate performance he was putting up earlier.
Also Clowney had much better production earlier in his career and a
far less troubling
injury history
Further, despite his
injury problems in recent seasons which has seen him gradually feature in
less and
less games, Gareth Bale still has the faith of his coach and so the possible signing of Neymar isn't one that has been welcomed by Zidane.
Albeit it would be pernickety to indulge Sanchez in the list of
less - than - impressive Arsenal players, the midfield duo of Ozil and Ramsey (until his
injury) has failed to stamp their mark on proceedings so
far.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a
less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply
far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box
far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when
injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position
far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the
injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Literally the only traits Landry has an edge over Cooper in is that he has
less concentration drops, and he hasn't dealt with as many
injuries (which could easily just be the luck of the draw so
far, and isn't necessarily predictive of anything).
We haven't lost team value in the last two years, we haven't gotten weaker in the last two seasons, we haven't finished
further down the table in the last two seasons, we haven't replaced players with worse players in the last two seasons, we haven't gotten more
injuries than usual, we haven't been kicked out of the CL any earlier than usual, and we haven't spent
less than usual but we have won two FA cups.
2nd sure Walcott has become a squad player and it doesn't look like it will change anytime soon!But even thought he is
less important than he used to be thanks to some youth prospect finally stepping up (Ox) and our new transfer policy ($ $ $) he still has that pace and ability to score and create havoc after 1 to 1,5 year out your rusty but obviously if he's dead on a pay raise I wouldn't go as
far as to say he's holding us ransom but it is too much considering he's current impact and importance to the squad... Sure we could argue that he will rediscover his form and give us 20 + goals a season and not sustain an
injury anymore but how sure are we?
Lee isn't a ticking time bomb, but with
far less contract length and an elbow
injury still in his rearview, the Phillies can't wait forever or they risk getting nothing and not having Lee going forward.
Same tactics, 1 - 0 then again 1 - 0, then again 1 - 0 and the story continues while playing 25 %
less games that the other teams in Europe with
less injuries from
far less games to worry about.
The Hokies have more known quantities than most of the division, but if
injuries strike at receiver or on either line, youth could lower Tech's floor quite a bit, especially considering Tech's quarterback will either be a freshman or a JUCO transfer
far less proven than Evans.
It may be easy to forget how well the England forward settled into life as an Arsenal player because the
injuries have restricted him to
less than 50 games in all competitions so
far but I would like to remind you of the pace, power and versatility that made a lot of us prefer him to Giroud, who I personally feel is hugely underrated by Gooners everywhere.
Given Andy's abilities to get the most from
far less talented QBs the only thing that will keep PM2 from being an all time great is
injury.
Hernandez should move
further up that list this year, given Hudson strikes hitters out at
less than half the pace of Felix these days, and Peavy is dealing with a back
injury that has limited him to 7 2/3 innings on the season.
With the Japanese international having seemingly shaken off the
injuries that have somewhat plagued his début season at Old Trafford it seems as though fans are seeing what is close to the best of the former Dortmund man and Chelsea's at times somewhat erratic defensive line will have to avoid pushing up too
far as Kagawa would punish them in very much the same manner Scott Parker and Gylfi Sigurdsson did to Arsenal in last weekend's North London derby, with their clever reverse passes splitting the Gunners» flatfooted
less than athletic defence for both Spurs goals.
That is 10
less than the season previous and although a troublesome groin
injury did not help matters, it is simply
far too few for a player who should have been given more of a chance this season.
Although each of the teams using the PEP exercise program had a dedicated athletic training staff, the success reported in the earlier study in reducing ACL
injuries among 14 - to 18 - year - old competitive female club soccer players - who ordinarily do not benefit from direct oversight from certified athletic trainers (ATCs) or physical therapists - suggest that the program may benefit other age groups and levels of play where direct oversight by medical professionals is
far less common.
The results of the study suggest that the lap belt should be wrapped across the upper thighs of the child as they are stronger and the chances of a serious
injury is
far less.
They say that's a remnant of when the system was created decades ago, before advances in medicine which have made certain types of
injuries far less serious and life - changing.
Nardini will attest that when basic physics are applied to holistic, intuitive movement, yogis can become much stronger, burn
far more calories and sustain
less injury.
If he or she wishes to improve bone density, back strength, or improve weak hamstrings, he or she is
FAR better served engaging in a carefully designed weight training program incorporating a deadlift variation or two - there is
less chance for
injury, a much shorter learning curve, and quite frankly he or she will be
less physically devastated after a few sets of deadlifts than after moving a tractor tire back and forth across a parking lot.
Ultimate strength and mass gains will surely not match those of a high - weight regimen, but I would argue that for the vast majority of people looking to lose weight, build tone, and obtain some general fitness with
less risk of
injury, that this is
far preferable.
Thirdly, and probably most important —
far less chance of
injury.
Higher carb closes this window of metabolic flux forcing you to train more frequently and delivering
far less bang for buck while increasing oxidative stress and the risk of
injury.
And partial squats are not only
less effective for building the quads, they also fail to activate the hamstrings properly, they put more pressure on the knees and they result in weakness at the bottom part of the movement, muscle imbalances and possible
injury further down the line.
As a result, you're
far less likely to develop poor form and any of the attendant stresses and
injury risks that follow it.
By increasing overall core stability and glute strength you will become
far less prone to
injury, other benefits include increase in general balance (no need to hold on to the dirty subway, you can balance internally with your muscles), rapid increase on squat deadlift and other main lifts, improves overall coordination which improves overall life quality.
The real reason was, of course,
far less scandalous: Foster's rep told People that the
injury took place when she fell while skiing a few weeks ago.
The hinge pillar intruded
far less in the first test, and risk of
injuries to the legs and feet was low.
The actual amount will reportedly depend on the veteran's age and
injury; the average lump - sum award is currently $ 43,000, according to Veterans Affairs, meaning most will get
far less than the maximum amount.
Renters insurance is
far less expensive than paying a lawyer to defend you against a lawsuit, especially one that's frivolous or resulting from
injuries that just aren't all that serious.
When a child is relaxed, the dog is able to relax, and this makes a bite
injury far less likely to happen.
Neutered males are
far less territorial and so there is
far less chance of a fight with rival tom,
less chance of
injuries becoming infected.
Keeping dwarf hamsters with their kind has a
far less chance of serious
injury than with other breeds.
Moving is good for Fido's joints particularly as he begins to age, and keeping him fit and trim reduces excess pressure on his hips and knees, leaving him
far less prone to pain and
injury.
International research reveals that as cycling participation increases, a cyclist is
far less likely to collide with a motor vehicle or suffer
injury and death - and what's true for cyclists is true for pedestrians.
Further research is also needed on the impact of traffic calming in other settings in which the background decline in
injury rates might be
less dramatic, particularly in low and middle income settings, where 85 % of road traffic related
injuries occur3 and where there has been little evaluation of the impact of traffic calming schemes.16
As you go
further out into Delaware, Montgomery, Chester and Bucks Counties, the Mainline area and into towns like Media, it becomes
less competitive, but it is still challenging to compete in common practice areas like personal
injury, criminal and family law.
In relation to Scottish Speculative Agreements it is clear again from Lord Gill's Review that there is a significant issue relating to Access to Justice; this is discussed on pages 98 and 99 and para 107 «as
far as Access to Justice is concerned, speculative fee arrangements were said to have been responsible for a reduction in the number of firms taking on personal
injury litigation, resulting in
less choice for consumers but a concentration of expertise in those firms dealing with such cases... Another respondent was of the view that speculative fee arrangements were being entered into where there was little risk».
Representing yourself in a personal
injury case is very risky; insurance companies and their attorneys know just how to coerce you into accepting
far less than you deserve in exchange for agreeing to sign a release.
For the most part, unrepresented parties can not afford such disbursements, and often settle too early, and for
far too
less money, as a result of not being able to afford to prolong the matter to get proper compensation for their
injuries.
In contrast, ankle
injuries are
far less often the result of degenerative changes and are usually caused by trauma, rarely leading to concerns about preexisting
injuries or arthritic changes.
Many personal
injury victims are entitled to recover
far less than this.
Victims who are backed by the guidance and support of an experienced and knowledgeable personal
injury lawyer find insurance companies
far less argumentative.
I'm only critical of personal
injury lawyers who strive to create lengthy medico - legal expert witness battles that give rise to protracted litigation thus
further driving up litigation costs — or who fail to challenge even completely unqualified insurer defence «experts» because by purging them from the system there loss would result in
far less (predictable) accusations of opportunistic malingering requiring litigation.
GEICO is a money - making machine, and has in its hands a team of insurance adjusters that are trained in how to trick claimants into accepting
FAR less than they deserve for their
injury claims.
For the most part, unrepresented parties without a plaintiff ICBC lawyer can not afford such disbursements, and often settle too early, and for
far too
less money, as a result of not being able to afford to prolong the matter in order to get proper compensation for their
injuries.