Sentences with phrase «far less questions»

Not exact matches

So far, the Bitcoin address in question has recorded three transactions totaling a mere 0.002409 Bitcoin, or less than $ 2.
That said, responses from partisans on the question of passive investment paint a far less rosy picture for the Liberal government.
One major reason that institutions are inherently conservative is that continuing in existing ruts is far easier and less demanding than asking searching questions and allowing ourselves to be reshaped by the answers.
Specifically, it's far less common to hear about how a student who finds their way to or from Christianity, Islam, or Judaism (or even Atheism for that matter) while attending a university.Taking classes and sharing experiences alongside classmates from varying backgrounds can cause even the most religious or nonreligious person to inspect, analyze, and even question their beliefs.
Without them we should have far less than that full impression, even though their precise historical verisimilitude may be open to grave question.
Oh John, you profess god's love from one side of your face while hating atheists from the other and then go so far as to question the morality and credibility of people you don't even know and know even less about.
So far our comments have been largely a contrast of stances toward human existence: a plea for a more truly dialectical, less dualistic understanding of the relation between form and energy, a plea for a similar openness toward the past, a question about the future to the effect that the incompleteness of the present ought not to frustrate Dr. Altizer into insisting that the total reversal promised by the glimpsed eschatological future be the only standard or norm of faith.
Finally, on the abortion question, ordinary Americans seem far less agitated than their elected representatives.
In his later service as prime minister, Begin is best known for ceding the Sinai Peninsula to Egypt in exchange for a peace treaty, a widely praised accomplishment, though its wisdom (which not a few far - sighted people questioned at the time) seems less evident now with the rise of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.
But to answer your question... There are and were injuries to two starters in this loosing period, Lillard was out one game due to his son's birth and tweaked his ankle upon return, he has looked less the 100 % on some nights ever since and is far from that MVP candidate performance he was putting up earlier.
CIES Football Observatory estimated the value of those who have moved on to a new side over the past few months; and they not only reported the players who cost far more than they should have done, but they also discovered which teams paid significantly less than the man at question's market value.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
I think the answer to the articles question is WE COULD win the EPL with Giroud leading the line, but we are unlikely to with the current dynamic and when taking into account the afore mentioned things that could go wromg we are far less likely to.
When I say «never a pen in a million years», I'm mostly speaking to (c), since, whether right or wrong, the way most of us evaluate whether an official has gotten a call right or not is whether it's more or less consistent with how officials typically call similar situations (of course, a further problem is that there's no one answer to the question, «how do officials typically call this kind of situation on the pitch?»
Add to that the fact that despite spending far less than Arsenal (particularly on wages) Spurs have not only caught the Gunners but overtaken them and you have to ask the question of what you get for your money.
We're quick to talk about the important questions that Asian communities should be asking themselves but far less willing to ask questions of ourselves.
Also, when we ask people about specific public service cuts they are far, far less positive than they are to general questions about reducing the deficit.
Alistair Darling, right behind Harman, looks like he's going to burst out of his skin, watching someone who evidently knows far less than him answer questions on the economy.
Odds are Gov. Andrew Cuomo and legislative leaders will reach a deal on the $ 150 - plus billion spending plan in time, as the governor has made this a priority of his time in office, more or less achieving it in each of his five years leading the state thus far (last year's is the only one in question, as the budget was technically voted through after the midnight deadline).
Launching the campaign, BHA Chief Executive Andrew Copson commented, «Despite over half the population in the UK describing themselves as non religious, humanist perspectives on life's big questions are still far less available to the public than religious ones.
Alan Duncan, whose parliamentary career has been much less entertaining since his excellent role as shadow leader of the Commons, now looks far too grown - up as he answers questions.
The question came from a separate 2011 story where the publication suggested strippers could suffer in a bill-less economy, with G - strings and garter belts far less accommodating of cold metal.
Despite over half the population in the UK describing themselves as non religious, humanist perspectives on life's big questions are still far less available to the public than religious ones.
«Today David Cameron tries to pose as a champion of the people but in truth he wishes to restrict the British people to a choice on a narrow question about a treaty of far less significance.»
Since jurors broke in between to ask a question of Judge Stephen Herrick, the panel's actual deliberations could have lasted far less than 45 minutes.
Igini who made the revelation Wednesday while answering questions on a local radio program monitored in Uyo said,» less than seven million people have so far been registered for forth coming general elections».
While the winners celebrate and wage the far less competitive general election, those who lost have been left with questions about their campaigns, and about what to do next.
The Los Angeles group's questions were far less thorough, Patton says.
Which is it is more or less an academic question as far as we're concerned.
The festive impetus to step things up is enormous, leading to Christmas Eve being the most common day of the year to pop the question.1 For couples not in that zone, the pressure to get there can be huge: far less stressful indeed to be single, as at least then you know what surprises your Christmas will hold.
With OKCupid, rather than facing a blank box and having to conjure up an answer for a question such as «Write about your personal strong points», users are instead asked quick, simple questions that populate their profile, making the process far less interview - like and far more fun.
The answer ultimately proves far less pertinent than the question of whether women in general ought to be fretting about juggling the competing demands of family and career.
Other questions are answered too, but they're far less interesting.
The movie certainly doesn't push the envelope as far as it could in this respect, much less (a la last week's Tully) dive deeply into the questions it raises about how motherhood impacts a person's sense of identity.
While quick and eager to offer food for thought with its questions raised, they are then far less sure to offer any sort of satisfying explanations or even at least the beginnings of them, the wishy - washy vagueness ultimately coming off as a willful decision less for intriguing, stimulating ambiguity than to rather gracelessly leave open back doors for sequels.
Even as «residency» programs and other hands - on teacher education models flourish, the vexing question of what prospective teachers in the United States should learn in their coursework has gained far less attention in the discourse of international comparisons.
As an extension, you can challenge students to explain the more / less important reasons, and there is a further extension question for more ale students.
Further, teachers are less likely to encourage questions, tinkering, or deviations from the script when they feel pressure to accomplish goals that might not leave time for questions, tinkering, or deviations from the script.
«There are far too many questions about their track record in other states, combined with how new these schools are to North Carolina, to already be proposing ways to make them less accountable,» Keith Poston, president and executive director of the nonpartisan, Raleigh - based Public School Forum of N.C., told Policy Watch this year.
«The question of whether character can be learned is unambiguously yes,» Yeager says, and kids absorb lessons from their social environment all the time, «but intentional efforts are far less successful than unintentional ones.»
It's far less common for teachers to plan the questions they will use to determine whether the instruction has succeeded.
Second, schools now employ many more teachers with far less experience than they have in the past, raising questions around the attractiveness and stability of the teaching profession.
What has received far less attention, though it is a far larger question, with more sweeping implications, is the role of disruptive students in schools.
Question is, how long can combustion hang on in the face of far superior clean, non-radiative, far less expensive technology??
Granted, self - publishing a book today is far less labor and financially intensive than what I experienced with my game, but the question for me today is still the same, albeit the words are different:
The assets in question are technically in compliance with the rules of the Fed, but are worth far less than the amount loaned against them.
Meanwhile, in a deflationary world, hard assets are worth less and less each year, causing consumers to question purchases since they'll be discounted further into the future and this cyclical black hole keeps broadening.
The real question is this: Is it worth the $ 40 asking price for this new and improved version when various other editions cost far less?
One of the most exciting and unique things about the xenosaga series is that you can look foward to seeing different character models with each new game because appearence of the characters change with each game, not because the characters have aged but for other reasons.There is one special thing that xenosaga episode three has that should have been in the other xenosaga games is the swimsuit mode because it allows you to watch movie scenes with the characters in there swimsuits but for some reason not all of the movie scenes in xenosaga 3 can be viewed in swimsuit mode, I guess it would have made the movie less serious or something.My favorite movie scenes in xenosaga are blue testament, white testament, KOSMOS verses Black Testament, any movie with Luis Virgil becaus ehe is my favorite character in the game because he's passionate and i don't think that he is a bad guy since he was able to brek free from being a testament and the only real reasons why he became a testament was because he wanted to be able to visit that old church on miltia and to gain power to prevent death.I also love Luis Virgil and all of the movie scenes that he appear in becaus they are very dramatic.The best thing about the xenosaga series is thst the story is very dee, interesting, and shocking and anyone who has played the game in order from episode one through three will definitely say the same thing.There is no doubt that anyone who has completed episode one and two will be stunned when every secret and mystery is unraveled in episode three.The one thing that I can't seem to under stand is why do some of the characters have to travel back to the earth in the end, will shion and the gang make it back to earth or will there descendants finish the mission and find earth in the end, Chaos and Nephilim told the group that the key to saving humanity lies on earth, what I want to know is what is it and how will it be used to save the universe, Even in the end new mysteries arose and remained unraveled.If there is any one outher who has has the awnswer to any of these questions please let me know when you write you're review or else there has just got to be a xenosaga four on the way, (crying) they just can't leave the story end this way.The only thing that dissapointed me about the game at first was the battle system because on the back of the case of xenosaga three said that the best aspect of the previous battles systems from episode one were combined to form a new battle system, If namco had really done this Xenosaga episode three would have had a better battle system in my opinion because I belive that the best aspect of xenosaga episode one were the special atacks wich are better than the those of episode three and the best aspect of episode three as the break system wich was also better than those of episode three.I think that namco should have given xenosaga episode 3 the battle system of episode 2 combined episode ones style of special attack, but doing this would have probably made the battle system of xenosaga episode three boring because the same old tactics would have to be used in a new game and the battle system most likely would not be as realistic as it is but it would probably be cooler.However the ability to summon all four Erde Kaisers including the new Erde Kasier Sgma my most favorite summon in the world at will and use new Ether and Tech attacks along with the new Counter and Revenge abilities gave xenosaaga episode three more than boost that it needed to have an descent battle systemThe E.S battle system of xenosaga episode 3 is way more better than those of episod one and two though, I must say that Namco really outdid themselves with the E.S battle system of xenosaga episode because the other E.S battle system from the two previos games weren't good, luckily they made up for it with the character battle system.In episode one I never really wanted to use anA.G.W.S, lucky for me they were optional but in episode two sadly it is manatory that you pilot an E.S to progress in the game in Episode three you piloting an E.S is also mandatory to progress in the game but the difference between the three episode is that will be sorry in episode three you will ge glad that you are using an E.S because their battle system is extremely cool.Xenosaga is most definitely one of the besrt RPG games in the world andit is far more better than any final fantasy game that Square Enix has ever made but for some reason it still score lower than Some Final Fantasy and other Sqare Enix games on this site.I bet that if xenosaga was actually named Final Fantasy and had a subtitle it and if it wre made by sqare Enix it would have probably been more famous and it would have scored higher even though it is still the same gameIn the end with every thing being written said and done all i can say is that I feel more at peace now that I have defended this underated game.All I have to say now is that TURN BASED GAMES RULE!
Interview questions are limited to Rare Replay, sorry not a chance of me leaking any future, potential maybe projects J — what I would say is Rare's development philosophy is to create surprising and delightful games that players will love, this means its less about a remake and more about we would need feel that we could take a genre or IP further, do something different and push boundaries with a specific game — We will do this with Sea of Thieves which is why it's the right next game from Rare, I actually believe we have done this with Rare Replay — there is no collection like this!
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z