Sentences with phrase «far less radiation»

Digital images are acquired more rapidly, utilize no toxic chemicals, and create far less radiation exposure compared with standard film.

Radiation exposure to your pet is also reduced as we use far less radiation for digital radiography.

Not exact matches

Radiation shielding to minimize dangerous solar and cosmic radiation that are far less of an issue within the protective boundaries of Earth's magnetic field.

Far safer jobs exist, with better pay, more job security, more regular hours, and more opportunities... not to mention less exposure to radiation, nasty chemicals, biological pathogens, high voltages, and sharp, pointy things.

«Ionizing radiation found to soften tumor cell microenvironment: When irradiated, less stiff extracellular matrices reduced cancer growth and migration, bolstering the case to further understand fractionated radiation therapy.»

The impact of a dirty bomb would be far less than that of a true nuclear device, and the radiation would probably not harm many people.

Storm clouds play a big role in keeping the planet cool by reflecting heat back into space — but they're not as effective farther north or south, where there's less solar radiation anyway.

«Seyfert» galaxies, which are all around us, are sort of miniquasars, producing a torrent of radiation from their core that, though it's far less than a quasar's, is spectacular by ordinary galactic standards.

Life could eventually spread farther when such stars evolve pass their flare stage, since spectral - type M stars emit much less ultraviolet radiation once they quiet down.

If you're concerned about the radiation, although it's far less exposure than a nuclear stress test or heart catheterization, take an antioxidant vitamin pack 45 minutes before the CT to reduce the DNA risk by 50 %.

Results published so far are promising: Breast - cancer patients who practice yoga while undergoing radiation therapy have lower levels of stress hormones and report less fatigue and better quality of life.

Allowing for that falling on the oceans, and further decline due to angle of incidence as distance from equator increases, less the amount required by vegetation for photosynthesis, we are left with how much energy for conversion of solar radiation to heat / electricity / catalytic reaction to other fuels?

Thus the radiation heat balance, according to the IPCC, in the NH must be far less positive than in the SH (as example: a loss of 5 W / m2 TOA due to aerosols in the NH Indian Ocean).

Now, when the energy received directly from the Sun at the surface of Venus is less than 10 % of what we receive on Earth, then there is less than 10 % coming back as back radiation — far less in fact.

Plankton is largest CO2 absorber, but also oceans are near or largest (by far largest in the more distant past) CO2 emitters, so if CO2 happen to be an important factor than: High UV / radiation = reduction in plankton = less CO2 absorbed = warming, reverse holds true.

More dramatically, fear of radiation led to extraordinary safety requirements for nuclear power plants, far in excess of controls imposed on other high - risk industrial facilities, which made nuclear power less cost - competitive and led to more reliance on coal.

As one goes further north toward the North Pole, the length of the shortwave radiation season is shortened with less ability to melt out multi-year sea ice (D. Perovich, personal communication).

That way the collector absorbs solar radiation with high efficiency but emits far less thermal radiation.

These can not — and will not — destabilize the atmosphere to start up convection, because they always move net heat in the direction that makes convection even less likely, given that convection is driven by temperature differences that conduction or radiation further reduce.

Nov 2007) and the comment of Meier et al. (below) point out that at far northern latitudes, the surface receives less solar radiation over the summer season compared with the Beaufort Sea.

For this reason, the shell will receive less W / sqm from Earth radiation than is emitted by the surface, because the radiation will spread out by the inverse square law just as sunlight gets less intense the further from the sun you get, and the shell will radiate more to space than back to Earth.

A small localized change in surface temperature can cause a convection burst (thunderstorm) and a large increase in convection height, improving both reflection of incoming solar radiation, and conveying sensible heat to a higher altitude where it can then escape to space via radiative processes with far less interference.

The most highly variable parts of the Sun's spectrum of radiation are found at the very shortest wavelengths — the ultraviolet (UV) and X-ray region — and in the very longest and far less energetic band of radio waves.

Heat from the hot core and nuclear radiation amount to far less than 1 %.

Few of the deaths are attributable to radiation (far fewer than the number of deaths from riding in trains and walking on the streets), and most of the nuclear powerplant damage has occurred in plants already scheduled to be decommissioned soon, and will (probably) come to less than 2 % of total property damage.

-- Yes, it may be correct in so far as they can say that; «around 10 % of the wavebands emitted by IR radiation are made up of wave - lengths that can not be absorbed by «Greenhouse Gases» (GHGs), but that can not possibly mean that 0.04 %, in the case of CO2 concentration but certainly less than 10 % of the Atmosphere as a total has got what must be a «supernatural» ability to stop LWR.

As for the rest, well, the dystopian evidence seems overwhelming indeed, to the point where it might be no stretch at all to say the biggest threat facing America is perhaps not global warming, not perpetual warmongering, not garbage food or low - level radiation or way too much Lindsay Lohan, but a populace far too ignorant to know how to properly manage any of it, much less change it all for the better.

Treatments such as radiation, chemotherapy, surgery, including reconstructive surgery are far less likely to be offered to Indigenous patients with cancer than to non-Indigenous patients with cancer.