Not exact matches
Trust me, it's
far more work trying
to justify a delusion and rationalizing why what you believe isn't consistent with what you see in the real world than having one
answer for all the questions you people flail about trying
to answer and be able
to rely on
simple logic and facts
to conclude there is no god.
To answer your question... yes I am exploring the same issues by creating a very simple series of short vidoes placed on the web which exmaines a different path for the 21st century church to follow and what it could look like, Its not advertised but about 3500 viewings so fa
To answer your question... yes I am exploring the same issues by creating a very
simple series of short vidoes placed on the web which exmaines a different path for the 21st century church
to follow and what it could look like, Its not advertised but about 3500 viewings so fa
to follow and what it could look like, Its not advertised but about 3500 viewings so
far.
Some
Further Reflections on the Origins of the Doctrine of the Trinity,» Coakley writes that «it is the perception of many Christians who pray either contemplatively or charismatically that the dialogue of prayer is strictly speaking not a
simple communication between an individual and a distant and undifferentiated divine entity, but rather a movement of divine reflexivity, a sort of
answering of God
to God in and through one who prays.»
The
simplest yet by
far the best
answer I've ever found
to that question is by trying
to love more.
The
answer is
simple; Wenger is a complete representation of what the board wants (ambition) and that message has been clearly passed on
to the players (job well done as
far as the board is concern) and the result is what you see on the pitch and the board is happy
to extend Wenger's contract and his pay too.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position
to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has
far more questions than
answers...
to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried
to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and
far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want
to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem
to have a pretty good history when it comes
to that position... as
far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those
simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers
to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things
to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz
to the starting lineup due
to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition
to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB
to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need
to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need
to target a CDM then do whatever it takes
to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us
to become dominant again we need
to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper
to CB
to DM
to ACM
to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil
to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed
to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed
to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time
to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just
to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye
to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need
to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had
to wait so many years
to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes
to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes
to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk
to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went
to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest
to strikers who were clearly not going
to press their current teams
to let them go
to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants
to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due
to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately
to raise awareness for several years when cracks began
to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued
to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
Those who spent the last year telling us
to follow the American example with yet more fiscal stimulus need
to answer this
simple question: why has the US economy grown more slowly than the UK's so
far this year?
The
answer to that comes from the close of the second World War (actually you can go
further back
to the League of Nations and WWI, but lets keep it
simple).
Their smaller and
simpler brains make them
far easier
to study than wild turtles and pigeons, and so may one day provide some
answers.
As
far as privacy itself is concerned, I have a
simple answer to that.
An
answer to the puzzle of the two different symmetry axes in NGC 4151 could shed
further light on other objects that do not easily fit into the
simple unified scheme.
The
simple answer is
to do as much as you can without pushing yourself too
far.
The
simple reason and
answer to this question is that we care about you and it feels good
to see the people whom we care about, live happily and if that is because of us, then our experts feel that — «Nothing stops us
to go a mile
further to get you the best.»
With OKCupid, rather than facing a blank box and having
to conjure up an
answer for a question such as «Write about your personal strong points», users are instead asked quick,
simple questions that populate their profile, making the process
far less interview - like and
far more fun.
To answer this question, it would be far too simple just to round up a group of high - performance sports cars to tes
To answer this question, it would be
far too
simple just
to round up a group of high - performance sports cars to tes
to round up a group of high - performance sports cars
to tes
to test.
The
answer is
far simpler than you might think and it does nt require you
to read endless surveys.
She was created for a purpose so revolutionary, someone was willing
to kill for it.Seventeen - year - old Lexi Matthews keeps two secrets from her elite boarding school classmates she s the daughter of a famous and controversial geneticist, and she can influence people s thoughts.But after new student Jack DeWeese heals her broken arm with an anything - but -
simple touch, he forces Lexi
to face a new reality her abilities reach much
further than speaking
to the minds of others.After Lexi s father goes missing and she receives threatening emails, she can t decide whether
to fall into Jack s arms or run and hide.As Lexi seeks
answers to what she and Jack are, she discovers a truth more unsettling than anything her science books can teach.
While the
answer to that is
far from
simple, there are some important issues that need considering.
First of all, the young man at the reception area was very nice but not prepared
to answer simple questions from guests: closest supermarket, how
far from Hobby airport, etc..
Of course you might be thinking why should I build around terrain when I can just flatten, and the
answer is
simple: building a track in union with the natural terrain often gives a
far better flow
to the finish product.
Further to Eric's response
to John Finn at # 20, presumably the
simplest answer of all is that almost everyone agrees that there was a «Little Ice Age» of sorts which affected at least Europe, and from which rewarming had begun by the 18th century.
Mr. Morano, given that you have often used your government title as part of your posts, and given previous dialogues here on Dot Earth, I would like
to point out that you have not yet
answered the very
simple questions asked on a recent Dot Earth blog post, as
far as I can tell.
«
Further Uses of Primitive Calculations By the 1970s,... scientists were starting
to see that the climate system was so rich in feedbacks that a
simple set of equations might not give an approximate
answer, but a completely wrong one.
Ray's
answer makes it obvious (for me) that reality is very complex and
far from being explainable by
simple, hand - made arguments for the general audience; that's why I think that trying
to explain «simply» the very complex phenomena involved in radiation transfer is just lost time - and in my opinion the REAL issues associated with social impacts of GW are not primarily associated with the detailed physics of the phenomenon.
Should the veracity of the GH theory not have
to answer to these
far more detailed predictions then
to a
simple estimation of increased surface temperature, and using whichever of the various means of arriving at a global average best matches that one parameter?
I think the
answer is
far more
simple than many have led us
to believe: we have not done the things that are necessary
to lower emissions because those things fundamentally conflict with deregulated capitalism, the reigning ideology for the entire period we have been struggling
to find a way out of this crisis.
The
simplest things one can do microscopically are things like detailed balance estimates, and so
far I haven't made Joe happy even with what I've attempted there, although I think he realizes that my
answer is irrelevantly imprecise (or he should realize it once he follows the reasoning in the algebra above that lays out how air can be isothermal and still have the MB velocity distribution from the bottom out
to where the assumptions of thermodynamics break down anyway, because
to many, many digits when meters is the mean free path of the gas and meters.
The
answer to your question is
far from
simple.
FOMD asked «TonyB, please let me ask you a question that is
far simpler to answer, than any question you have ever asked me (a question that other Climate Etc readers are cheerfully invited
to answer too!)
Simple climate models are perfect in
answering many questions, but they require too many unphysical assumptions when they are used
to answer other questions, and they can not tell anything about some
further ones.
Ron, If you check my
further answers to your comment on my site, you may notice, that I consider it essential that models are chosen
to be as
simple as possible (and it has been my principle for longer than 25 years).
The
simple answer is that while climate is critically important
to the survival of a species, it's
far from the only important factor.
It is not uncommon
to receive an urgent (and
far from
simple) information request that must be
answered in preparation for a client call in twenty minutes.