Thus, liquid sodium is the coolant of choice in
fast reactors because it can effectively transfer heat away from the nuclear fuel, while at the same time maximizing the number of fast neutrons.
Not exact matches
Because the
fast -
reactor waste would contain no significant quantity of long - lived transuranics, its radiation would decay to the level of the ore from which it came in several hundred years, rather than tens of thousands.
An Outdated Strategy Early nuclear engineers expected that the plutonium in the spent fuel of thermal
reactors would be removed and then used in
fast - neutron
reactors, called
fast breeders
because they were designed to produce more plutonium than they consume.
We understand that their first
fast reactors will use oxide or carbide fuel rather than metal — a less than optimum path, chosen presumably
because the PUREX reprocessing technology is mature, whereas pyroprocessing has not yet been commercially demonstrated.
Fast reactors can extract more energy from nuclear fuel than thermal
reactors do
because their rapidly moving (higherenergy) neutrons cause atomic fi ssions more effi ciently than the slow thermal neutrons do.
Mark Poling, wastewater treatment director at Durham, says it could be
faster,
because the
reactors are functioning better than expected.
Conceived in the 1970s, Monju was once at the leading edge of research into
fast fission
reactors, which have always been controversial
because they burn plutonium, an ingredient in bombs.
But experimental
fast reactors in the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, and France have all been shut down
because of high costs and concerns over handling plutonium.
Superphenix the French
fast - breeder
reactor shut down in 1990
because air leaked into its liquid sodium coolant, can not start up again until a public inquiry has been held, Prime Minister Pierre Beregovoy announced this week.
The dream turned nasty
because technologically the
fast reactor was too demanding.
«The possibility of cooperative work with Japan in the area of
fast reactors is something that is attractive to us precisely
because they have Monju,» Daniel Poneman, the U.S. deputy secretary of energy, said at a press conference today.
Poneman said Monju came up in the discussions
because of the possibility of using
fast reactors to burn plutonium and the long - lived isotopes of elements such as neptunium and americium that account for much of the radiotoxicity of nuclear waste.
The idea remains that
fast reactors, which get their name
because the neutrons that initiate fission in the
reactor are zipping about
faster than those in a conventional
reactor, could offer a speedy solution to cleaning some nasty nuclear waste, which fissions better with
fast neutrons, while also providing electricity as a by - product.
«Unlike today's nuclear
reactor, the IFR [integral
fast reactor] can generate unlimited amounts of inexpensive clean power for hundreds of thousands of years... It provides an excellent solution for what to do with our nuclear waste
because it can use our existing nuclear waste for fuel and it is significantly more proliferation - resistant than other methods of dealing with nuclear waste... The IFR is also inherently safe.
«Integral
fast reactors avoid this whole problem
because you never have to enrich uranium.
I support R&D for
fast and thermal neutron molten salt breeder
reactors because I believe they can be proven safe from high energy criticality accidents from basic principles of physics.