Sentences with phrase «fault by a court of law»

The term «victim» is used since the auto insurance company is writing a check to them, which means they were not deemed at fault by a court of law.

Not exact matches

The Court also rejected the contractor's claim that the municipality could not collect liquidated damages because it was at least partially at fault for the delays in completing the project, clarifying that, if a contract provides for an extension of the contract's termination date, due to delays not caused by the contractor, then collection of liquidated damages is not strictly abrogated under Connecticut law.

The Supreme Court overturned Roy's conviction, stating that «the trial judge erred in law erred by equating fault with the failure to explain the conduct,» and concluded that the accident was a result of «a single and momentary error in judgment with tragic consequences.»

By either admitting fault or assigning blame, you're running the risk of jeopardizing your legal rights in a court of law, and that may affect your compensation in the long run.

«Reform of the substantive divorce law — for example by the introduction of «no ‐ fault» divorce — requires primary legislation,» observed Munby, who is president of the high court's family division and has been forthright in his criticism of government shortcomings.

Every person who by his fault causes harm to another is liable» I'm glad scholars are thinking about the law and linking it together, and I appreciate the insights, but the only ones which help when the court opens are the ones which will persuade a judge with a job to do, and no amount of precedent will do that on its own.

BINDING EFFECT OF DECISIONS BY COMPETITION AUTHORITIES The new law introduces a binding effect of decisions made by courts and competition authorities of other Member States and the European Commission, thereby removing the need to prove one of the elements of the breach — the infringement (faultOF DECISIONS BY COMPETITION AUTHORITIES The new law introduces a binding effect of decisions made by courts and competition authorities of other Member States and the European Commission, thereby removing the need to prove one of the elements of the breach — the infringement (faultBY COMPETITION AUTHORITIES The new law introduces a binding effect of decisions made by courts and competition authorities of other Member States and the European Commission, thereby removing the need to prove one of the elements of the breach — the infringement (faultof decisions made by courts and competition authorities of other Member States and the European Commission, thereby removing the need to prove one of the elements of the breach — the infringement (faultby courts and competition authorities of other Member States and the European Commission, thereby removing the need to prove one of the elements of the breach — the infringement (faultof other Member States and the European Commission, thereby removing the need to prove one of the elements of the breach — the infringement (faultof the elements of the breach — the infringement (faultof the breach — the infringement (fault).

Every legally relevant fault of the other spouse - and in our system of family law jurisprudence, they are virtually all «relevant» in the sense of being admissible at trial - will be described in unforgettably harsh language by opposing counsel either in a public courtroom or publicly available papers filed in court.

Now, 40 years after «no - fault» divorce laws established modern divorce standards (generally equal division of property, significant sharing of the children, and support of a lower earning parent by a higher earning parent), most families don't even need family court to make their decisions.

No fault divorce statutes do not require showing spousal misconduct and are a response to outdated divorce statutes that require proof of adultery or some other unsavory act in a court of law by the divorcing party.