Sentences with phrase «fault divorce in»

To file for a no - fault divorce in Indiana, file the divorce petition with the court stating that the divorce is irretrievably broken.

If you file for a no - fault divorce in Pennsylvania, you can get a divorce in six months if you and your spouse are in agreement.

If you are filing for a fault divorce in Mississippi — grounds for such a divorce include adultery and impotence — you are required to notify your husband at least 30 days before your case is scheduled to be heard in family court.

To file for no - fault divorce in Louisiana, you must live separate and apart from your spouse for 180 days.

As one of the leading divorce mediation practices in Boston and Massachusetts, we can assist you in filing for no - fault divorce in a civilized and economical process.

With the advent of no - fault divorce in many states, obtaining an absolute divorce has become a far less complicated process than in years past.

If a couple wants to file for a no - fault divorce in New Jersey a legal separation lasting at least 18 months is required.

A party seeking a no - fault divorce in Connecticut must meet a residency requirement by indicating which of the following applies when filing the divorce complaint: 1) the Plaintiff (the spouse filing the divorce complaint) or the Defendant (the non-filing spouse) has lived in Connecticut for at least the twelve months immediately prior to the filing of the divorce complaint or before the divorce becomes final; 2) the Plaintiff or the Defendant lived in Connecticut at the time of the marriage, moved away, and then returned to Connecticut, planning to live there permanently; and / or 3) the marriage broke down after the Plaintiff or the Defendant moved to Connecticut.

Fortunately, since the introduction of no - fault divorce in Pennsylvania (married couples have the option -LSB-...]

Although the couple may be living separate and apart for purposes of obtaining a no - fault divorce in Virginia, it is unclear whether this type of separation would be considered a sufficient separation for bankruptcy means - testing purposes.

The most senior female judge in UK history, Baroness Hale, has called for the introduction of no - fault divorce in England and Wales.

Condonation (a legal term meaning «conditional forgiveness») is a powerful defense to a fault divorce in South Carolina.

Baroness Hale, President of the Supreme Court, has championed no - fault divorce in a speech to family lawyers, a month before the court is due to hear the high - profile case of Owens v Owens.

His 2010 legislative successes included the law which provides for no fault divorce in New York State, ending the State's notoriety as the only jurisdiction in the nation without this provision.

Silver also weighed in on legalizing mixed marital arts — a potential revenue raiser — and instituting no fault divorce in New York.

When the divorce revolution took off with the advent of no - fault divorce in the 1960s, experts predicted that marriages overall would be happier because all the unhappy people would get divorced.

Not exact matches

I'm also quite capable of debating with him about whether or not government marriage in New York should allow no - fault divorce or whether married couples (as defined by the state!)

High in the catalogue of social pathologies afflicting marriage and the family in America stands our system of family law, the central purpose of which is to enforce no - fault divorce.

Divorce proliferated under the no - fault divorce laws in numbers never seen Divorce proliferated under the no - fault divorce laws in numbers never seen divorce laws in numbers never seen before.

Finally, the United States (and, it seems, the American church) has already redefined marriage numerous times in its history — no fault divorce, for example.

Along with no - fault divorce, this disorients lower - and middle - class Americans, contributing to a decline in marriage.

For the Church to blame contraception and women leadership on the fault of divorce, rape, drug abuse in kids, people having sex before marriage on women is hypocritical.

The subject was no — fault divorce, a practice that today is viewed with increasing disfavor in this country.

For, as the overwhelming public response to The First Wives Club reminds us, whatever the courts and legislatures may say, in the deepest places in the human heart, there is no such thing as a no — fault divorce.»

No - fault divorce became law in many states in the late sixties and early seventies.

The Nuffield Foundation's new report called «Finding Fault» claims sixty per cent of divorcing couples are making up stories of adultery and bad behaviour in order for the divorce to go through quickly under «fault - based» laws.

The public - policy recommendations include providing state - supported marriage and family education, developing a «family - friendly» workplace, and moving toward a modified «fault» divorce law in cases involving dependent children.

Derek, if attending a church is like a marriage, then bring on «no - fault divorce» in this jurisdiction!

And in the end it was all John King's fault for bringing up these multiple divorces up in the debate.

The supine acceptance by many churches of no fault divorce makes the «I have become a Christian so it is all different now» defense appear implausible, even if it is actually true in specific cases.

The first no - fault divorce statute was drafted in California by a legislator who had ended a 25 - year marriage to wed a younger woman; of the 14 assemblymen who testified for the law, ten were divorced.

On another level, the revolution in no - fault divorce law which has been of no help to the modem American family has been legitimated by the individualist rights - discourse of modernity, which Berger seems to believe is an unqualified good.

At the very least, she adds, the period between the filing and granting of a no - fault divorce should be lengthened: two to five years is the range in many West European nations.

Since the no - fault divorce revolution began in California in 1970 and spread to all 50 states, divorce decrees have generally mandated an equal division only of the couple's present assets and liabilities.

People are firm in their belief that both partners are equally at fault in any divorce.

My first divorce was in New York, which at the time did not have no - fault, so we had to pick a fault, and the requirement to be physically separated for 12 months before even filing.

And people in unhappy or abusive marriages couldn't easily divorce, either, until no - fault divorce came along.

Reiterate that the divorce is no one's fault — especially your child's — and you will still be a family, just in a different way.

Wolfinger also explores the divorce reform movement in America and argues in favor of no - fault divorce laws, arguing that a return to an age of tough divorce laws would recreate the social conditions that used to make divorce harder on children.

«The best interests of the child» governs in child custody, yet no - fault divorce does not serve that end.

States also now offer a no - fault divorce option, where both you and your spouse agree to disagree, in essence.

The early leader in the state pro-marriage movement, Louisiana set off a national debate in August 1997 by enacting a law that permits «covenant marriages, «26 whereby couples promise to stay married for life and renounce their legal right to a no - fault divorce.

The concept of no - fault divorce that is now legally enshrined (and is a good thing in itself) can unintentionally result in the individuals believing that they bear no responsibility for the breakdown.

Also on tap in the Assembly is the no - fault divorce deal that was reached in recent days with the Senate.

Women's groups are largely responsible for making New York the last state in the nation to adopt no - fault divorce.

To view the press conference prior to session visit http://www.youtube.com/user/nysenateuncut#p/u/0/e4lTYPISLcY After no - fault divorce legislation stalled in the Senate for many years, the Democratic Majority successfully passed this historic legislation:

The requirement under current law to determine who is at fault for causing the divorce has significant financial and emotional costs, and unnecessarily forces couples in deteriorating relationships to rehash the bitter, painful and embarrassing reasons for divorce.

New York has officially become the last state in the nation to adopt no - fault divorce following the governor's signature of a measure that will permit couples to separate by mutual consent, signaling a major policy shift that has far - reaching implications for both families and attorneys.

Opponents, which included an odd coalition of the Catholic Church and women's advocacy groups, argued no - fault divorce debases marriage, making it too easy for couples who should be working out their problems to throw in the towel (the church) and suggested it will now be too easy for the wealthier spouse — usually the man — to leave their partners without adequate resources (NOW - NYS President Marica Pappas blasted what she dubbed «divorce on demand»).

In fault - based divorce courts, such a claim would be perfectly legitimate, says Greg Lastowka, a professor of law at Rutgers University who is currently writing a book called Virtual Law.