Sentences with phrase «fault divorce often»

The introduction of no - fault divorce often provided a less fraught atmosphere for a parting of the ways.

Not exact matches

Moore Blatch wants to see laws passed that allow for divorce without blame, often called no fault divorce.

Because it can be difficult to prove the grounds for a for - cause divorce mentioned above, a no - fault divorce after the requisite separation period is often the best option.

Some states do not award alimony unless there is some form of wrongful conduct and those are often times only seen in fault divorces, where one spouse can prove something like abandonment, financial abuse, addiction, physical abuse, adultery, child abuse, etc. most states, now, are no fault, and if alimony is available it's often only rehabilitative.

To ease the stresses that often strain a family during divorce, Florida is one of many states that no longer use «fault» as one of the grounds for divorce.

-- The litigation process often seeks to assign fault to the divorce.

A «for fault divorce» is usually complex because the courts will need evidence to substantiate the claim of cruelty, which can often be a lengthy and difficult process.

In others, couples elect to file a no - fault divorce, which is often cited as «irreconcilable differences.»

By agreeing to these central issues, your divorce can proceed quickly and without the stress that often accompanies a typical divorce, which can include prolonged deliberation in court, discussion of martial fault, and the like.

This stems from the all too common belief that children often have that the divorce is somehow their fault.

Couples who divorce often get caught up in «the blame game,» in which the marital failure has to be someone's fault when in the majority of cases, divorce is a failure relationship skills.

Family judge, Sir James Munby, voices his views on «no fault» divorce and the difficulties cohabitees often face during relationship breakdown.

In no - fault divorce, the reason stated is often «irreconcilable differences.»

Thus, the law has intentionally stepped away from that which many people getting divorced often seek, namely, to have fault in the breakup of the marriage be the central theme of the case so that the party (more) at fault is «punished» somehow by the judge in the judge's ruling following trial.

Often this is accomplished by processing the end of your marriage as a legal separation rather than going right to a no - fault divorce.

Many divorces start out with the intent of being uncontested under claims of no - fault, but greed often propels a case into being contested.