Sentences with phrase «fault divorces makes»

However, the advent of no - fault divorces makes the issue less clear.

The supine acceptance by many churches of no fault divorce makes the «I have become a Christian so it is all different now» defense appear implausible, even if it is actually true in specific cases.

Not exact matches

The Pill, no - fault divorce, and now gay marriage have made traditional sexual ethics look outmoded at best and....

Long before there was a debate about same - sex anything, far too many people bought into a liberal ideology about sexuality that makes a mess of marriage: Cohabitation, no - fault divorce, extra-marital sex, non-marital childbearing, massive consumption of pornography and the hook - up culture all contributed to the breakdown of our marriage culture.

The Nuffield Foundation's new report called «Finding Fault» claims sixty per cent of divorcing couples are making up stories of adultery and bad behaviour in order for the divorce to go through quickly under «fault - based» laws.

He explained: «By introducing a no fault system - a genuine no fault system, it actually wouldn't make divorce easier, it would actually make it ever so slightly harder.

Wolfinger also explores the divorce reform movement in America and argues in favor of no - fault divorce laws, arguing that a return to an age of tough divorce laws would recreate the social conditions that used to make divorce harder on children.

Women's groups are largely responsible for making New York the last state in the nation to adopt no - fault divorce.

Giuliani's divorce attorney, Raoul Felder, said no - fault divorce «makes victims of the wrong people.»

Opponents, which included an odd coalition of the Catholic Church and women's advocacy groups, argued no - fault divorce debases marriage, making it too easy for couples who should be working out their problems to throw in the towel (the church) and suggested it will now be too easy for the wealthier spouse — usually the man — to leave their partners without adequate resources (NOW - NYS President Marica Pappas blasted what she dubbed «divorce on demand»).

A recent survey published by Liz Trinder at the University of Exeter suggested that 62 % of petitioning parties and 78 % of respondents said that using fault - based grounds had made the divorce process more bitter.

Proponents now want to make the course a prerequisite of filing in the hopes that it will be more effective at keeping families together - not a surprising goal, perhaps, for one of the last US states to embrace no - fault divorce, and one with a substantial Mormon population.

LetsGetDivorced.com provides a very powerful and easy to use online legal document assembly app that makes it cheap, quick and easy for people to file a no - fault uncontested divorce in New York State, without using an attorney.

I combined my legal skill and expertise in creating affordable, easy - to - use web applications, with my passion to help people improve their lives, and founded LetsGetDivorced.com to make divorce less stressful, simpler and very affordable, for spouses who can agree to file a no - fault uncontested divorce.

Further, a divorced wife may be entitled to compensation if the divorce is made without any fault on the part of the wife.

Family lawyers aren't much help either, and no - fault divorced may be an «easy out» for one person to make a unilateral decision to end the marriage.

Outside, the Royal Courts of Justice today, Lord Justice Munby spoke of a move towards a no fault divorce process making divorce an administrative matter dealt with at a register of birth, death, marriages (and divorces).

To make a determination as to what is considered equitable, the court must consider the entire situation, including the length of the marriage, ages of the spouses, contributions of each spouse to the marriage, and tax consequences of the division; however, the court is not allowed to consider whether either party is at fault in the divorce.

Since the failure of the marriage is not a moral question, no - fault makes other facets of the divorce — property settlement, support and custody — easier to negotiate.

No - fault makes divorce less expensive by reducing or eliminating legal battles, and because of this, a more civil environment to make support and property settlement decisions.

Although the courts will not consider fault when distributing marital property, the law permits judges to include it as a factor when making decisions about permanent alimony or spousal maintenance after your divorce is final.

The court is under no obligation to make the division equal, but must divide the entire estate according to the equities of the circumstances after considering such factors as the length of the marriage, the age and income of the spouses, and any fault established in the divorce.

Under no - fault, spouses have grounds for divorce when they agree that they can no longer make their marriage work, yet neither spouse is at fault for this breakdown.

Ninety (90) days from the date of the judgment of divorce nisi, your divorce will be final, which makes for a total of four (4) months from the hearing date for a no - fault, uncontested divorce.

Filing a no - fault divorce takes away the need to provide extensive evidence to prove a fault - based ground, generally making the divorce process quicker and less expensive.

Now, 40 years after «no - fault» divorce laws established modern divorce standards (generally equal division of property, significant sharing of the children, and support of a lower earning parent by a higher earning parent), most families don't even need family court to make their decisions.

With no - fault divorce the universal rule in the United States after the New York legislature's action in 2010, the temptation may exist to believe that an organic evolution in marriage law has run its course and that American society has reached a new consensus to make speedy divorce normative practice.

These two characteristics make a fault divorce more attractive to some people.

No - fault divorce laws were adopted beginning with California in 1969 and then spread to all 50 states.5 During the 1960s and 1970s, legal access to birth control including oral contraceptives became increasingly available, and in 1973 the U.S. Supreme Court made abortion legal in the landmark Roe v. Wade decision.6 These cultural changes created new opportunities for women and led to an increased presence in the labor market, doubling from 30.3 million in the 1970s to 72.7 million in the mid - 2000s.7

Ultimately, whether you allege fault grounds or no - fault grounds in your divorce complaint is your decision to make, after thinking through and discussing the pros and cons with your lawyer.

Instead of trying to force your child to tell you which parent they love most, focus on making sure they know any separation or divorce is not their fault and that both of you still love them the same as you always have.

In making an equitable apportionment of marital property, the family court must give weight in such proportion as it finds appropriate to all of the following factors: (1) the duration of the marriage along with the ages of the parties at the time of the marriage and at the time of the divorce; (2) marital misconduct or fault of either or both parties, if the misconduct affects or has affected the economic circumstances of the parties or contributed to the breakup of the marriage; (3) the value of the marital property and the contribution of each spouse to the acquisition, preservation, depreciation, or appreciation in value of the marital property, including the contribution of the spouse as homemaker; (4) the income of each spouse, the earning potential of each spouse, and the opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets; (5) the health, both physical and emotional, of each spouse; (6) either spouse's need for additional training or education in order to achieve that spouse's income potential; (7) the non marital property of each spouse; (8) the existence or nonexistence of vested retirement benefits for each or either spouse; (9) whether separate maintenance or alimony has been awarded; (10) the desirability of awarding the family home as part of equitable distribution or the right to live therein for reasonable periods to the spouse having custody of any children; (11) the tax consequences to each or either party as a result of equitable apportionment; (12) the existence and extent of any prior support obligations; (13) liens and any other encumbrances upon the marital property and any other existing debts; (14) child custody arrangements and obligations at the time of the entry of the order; and (15) such other relevant factors as the trial court shall expressly enumerate in its order.

This story shows that divorce happens when two people are too different to make a marriage work, without blame or fault.