Sentences with phrase «fault in the case of an accident»

Liability refers to the person who is found at fault in case of an accident.

New York law states that there is no fault in case of an accident.

Dashboard Camera: Getting a dashboard camera for your vehicle won't result in any specific insurance discount, but it can prove you are not - at - fault in the case of an accident, which can protect you from unfair premium increases.

Not exact matches

In cases where a motor vehicle accident is determined to be your fault, your insurance company may charge points to your policy at the time of renewal.

So, if you are living in no - fault state, your car insurance must have covered your medical expenses in case of car accident.

If an issue of comparative fault does arise in your case, contact a Boston car accident lawyer.

What's important to notice is that in a case such as this one, there will likely be liability over someone's head; even of the bus accident was not the fault of the bus driver.

Proving fault in the case of a truck accident in Spokane can be tricky.

In these cases, employees are eligible to receive these benefits regardless of whether they were at fault for the accident or if the accident was caused by their employer's negligence.

In many cases, the accident itself is only the beginning of what can be an extremely long process of filing an insurance claim, determining fault, and most importantly, getting the closure one needs to move on with their life.

Of course, it is important to remember that a truck accident may not be the truck driver's fault in some cases — it may be the result of another vehicle driving dangerouslOf course, it is important to remember that a truck accident may not be the truck driver's fault in some cases — it may be the result of another vehicle driving dangerouslof another vehicle driving dangerously.

Florida is a «comparative fault» state, meaning the plaintiff in the accident case can have their claim reduced proportionately to their own degree of fault.

In most cases, the insurance company of the defendant will attempt to prove that you were at least partially at - fault — if not completely at - fault — in the accidenIn most cases, the insurance company of the defendant will attempt to prove that you were at least partially at - fault — if not completely at - fault — in the accidenin the accident.

The complexity of bringing a lawsuit against the government, including the need to comply with statutory requirements in filing a notice of claim for injury, make the assistance of an experienced attorney a valuable asset in any accident or injury case in which a government entity may be at fault.

In many car accidents fault or liability is easy to determine (for instance ICBC would be hard pressed to make a case that the driver of a car that was struck from behind in a rear - end collision did anything wrong to attract any portion of faultIn many car accidents fault or liability is easy to determine (for instance ICBC would be hard pressed to make a case that the driver of a car that was struck from behind in a rear - end collision did anything wrong to attract any portion of faultin a rear - end collision did anything wrong to attract any portion of fault).

After establishing fault in a tractor - trailer accident case, we use skilled experts to help us determine the true extent of our client's injuries, and turn to life care economists to calculate accurate financial needs.

One of the important steps in a personal injury case is the determination of coverage through the insurance of the motorist who is at fault in an accident.

In today's case the claimant is found 50 % at fault for making a left hand turn, on a late yellow, causing the car accident which is the subject of this personal injury case.

One big issue for clients in car and truck accidents — particularly in cases where the injuries are extremely serious or fatal — is whether the at - fault driver is convicted of the traffic offense (s) for which the driver was cited.

Your uninsured motorist coverage will also pay for damages and bodily injuries in case of a hit and run accident where the identity of the at fault driver remains unknown.

If the first driver is determined to have suffered $ 100,000 worth of damages because of the accident, that number will be reduced by the percentage they were found to be at fault, which in this case is 15 %.

The best Orlando car accident attorneys know that when it comes to the burden of proof in crash cases, your word alone may not be enough to prove fault or damages.

In cases involving a statuatory violation of a traffic laws, a Bardstown car accident attorney can show negligence per se, which means the other driver is automatically at fault for the damages.

So in a pure uninsured motorist case where the other driver either can not be identified (hit - and - run or phantom vehicle are the most prominent examples) or has no insurance, your own insurance company essentially steps in the shoes of the defendant, assuming the at - fault driver's liability for the accident but also his damages.

Other factors that may determine the time involved to resolve your claim are whether fault for your injuries is an issue with the insurer, how many parties are involved, such as in the case where more than one person might be at fault for your injuries, and whether you might have had previous injuries or accidents that the insurer might argue are contributing to your symptoms or length of recovery.

Earlier this month, a Connecticut appellate court issued a written opinion in a motorcycle accident case that was brought by the accident victim against a museum that had arranged the classic - car drive in which the at - fault motorist was participating at the time of the accident.

Depending on the type of accident and injury from which a person suffers, it may be difficult to determine who is at fault in a personal injury case.

Mostly, cases like auto accidents are made at fault leading to its occurrence of a trial in court.

If you or a loved one has been seriously injured in a bike accident or any kind of accident that was not your fault, The Law Offices of J&Y specializes in personal injury law (as well as wrongful death claims in cases where a loved one has died).

In serious injury cases resulting in death, disability, or a serious impairment of bodily function, the victims of these accidents can seek additional damages from the at - fault driver based on his or her negligencIn serious injury cases resulting in death, disability, or a serious impairment of bodily function, the victims of these accidents can seek additional damages from the at - fault driver based on his or her negligencin death, disability, or a serious impairment of bodily function, the victims of these accidents can seek additional damages from the at - fault driver based on his or her negligence.

Tags: anxiety, chronic pain, future wage loss, ICBC claim, icbc claim advice, loss of earning capacity, neck injury, rear end accident, shoulder injury, soft tissue injury Posted in ICBC Back Injury (soft tissue) Cases, ICBC Chronic Pain Cases, ICBC Headache Cases, ICBC Liability (fault) Cases, ICBC Psychological Injury Cases, ICBC Shoulder Injury Cases, ICBC Soft Tissue Injury Cases, ICBC Wage Loss, ICBC Whiplash Cases, Uncategorized Direct Link Comments Off top ^

In all cases and especially those where the «at fault party's» insurance policies are limited you will need the help of an experienced child accident injury lawyer to help you quantify these claims in order to maxim the benefits available to the child as they grow oldeIn all cases and especially those where the «at fault party's» insurance policies are limited you will need the help of an experienced child accident injury lawyer to help you quantify these claims in order to maxim the benefits available to the child as they grow oldein order to maxim the benefits available to the child as they grow older.

The main characteristic of a personal injury case in which a Kansas City personal injury attorney might need to get involved is when another party was at fault for the accident.

The case illustrates an important concept that is applicable in all Florida car accident cases when the at - fault driver's insurance company disputes some aspect of the claim.

A knowledgeable car accident attorney can prove negligence in your head - on collision case by gathering enough evidence to cast a reasonable level of fault on the other driver, making them legally responsible for your financial injuries and damages.

Often, insurers will try to find ways in which an accident was the fault of a motorcyclist in an attempt to lessen the value of the case.

In a disputed liability case, the testimony of a lay witness can be helpful to the plaintiff in proving who was at fault for the accidenIn a disputed liability case, the testimony of a lay witness can be helpful to the plaintiff in proving who was at fault for the accidenin proving who was at fault for the accident.

We also handle complex claims based on oil refinery accidents in which multiple parties may be found to be at fault and proving the case may depend on exhaustive investigation and the retention of engineers and other experts to testify in court.

In a car accident case — especially in cases where an insurance company is disputing liability (or fault)-- lay witnesses can testify about the speeds and directions of vehicles, temperature and weather conditions at the scene, traffic conditions at the scene, lane markings, visibility conditions, observations made at the scene, statements that were made by either the plaintiff or the defendant at the scene, and the presence (or absence) of traffic control devices at the scene, such as traffic lights or stop signIn a car accident case — especially in cases where an insurance company is disputing liability (or fault)-- lay witnesses can testify about the speeds and directions of vehicles, temperature and weather conditions at the scene, traffic conditions at the scene, lane markings, visibility conditions, observations made at the scene, statements that were made by either the plaintiff or the defendant at the scene, and the presence (or absence) of traffic control devices at the scene, such as traffic lights or stop signin cases where an insurance company is disputing liability (or fault)-- lay witnesses can testify about the speeds and directions of vehicles, temperature and weather conditions at the scene, traffic conditions at the scene, lane markings, visibility conditions, observations made at the scene, statements that were made by either the plaintiff or the defendant at the scene, and the presence (or absence) of traffic control devices at the scene, such as traffic lights or stop signs.

In many of these cases the question of liability, or fault for the accident, is a point of contention between the parties.

In the case of a motorcycle accident in New Orleans, if a motorcyclist was not at - fault, they may be able to seek damages from the negligent party who caused the crasIn the case of a motorcycle accident in New Orleans, if a motorcyclist was not at - fault, they may be able to seek damages from the negligent party who caused the crasin New Orleans, if a motorcyclist was not at - fault, they may be able to seek damages from the negligent party who caused the crash.

(Note: in some types of injury cases, most notably those arising from car accidents in which a state vehicle code section was violated, statutes can be used to help establish fault for an accident or injury.)

Often, the period when the fault occurred and when death results can take seconds, as in the case of a car accident where a victim dies at the scene, or months, as where a doctor prescribes the wrong medication that over time results in the patients death.

In this ICBC medical examination denied case (Soczynski v. Cai, 2011 BCSC 1299) a personal injury claimant in a car crash was making a claim against ICBC and had already accessed no fault accident benefits following the car accident, pursuant to Part 7 of the Insurance (Vehicle) RegulationIn this ICBC medical examination denied case (Soczynski v. Cai, 2011 BCSC 1299) a personal injury claimant in a car crash was making a claim against ICBC and had already accessed no fault accident benefits following the car accident, pursuant to Part 7 of the Insurance (Vehicle) Regulationin a car crash was making a claim against ICBC and had already accessed no fault accident benefits following the car accident, pursuant to Part 7 of the Insurance (Vehicle) Regulations.

Even in cases where the other individual was ticketed for the accident, you can not automatically assume that they would be considered «at fault» in a court of law.

When it comes to personal injury cases, two crucial factors that must be examined include who was at fault in the accident and the severity and cost of damages.

Our skillful Atlanta construction site injury lawyers provide effective representation in cases where an accident was caused by the negligence of a company, as well as situations where a third party (i.e., the manufacturer of defective equipment) is at fault.

While individuals who are injured in car accidents are usually able to access Accident Benefits regardless of whether they were at fault for the accident, this is not the case for boating accidents.

Of course, in any slip and fall accident case, the insurance company and later the defending attorney will try to claim that the accident was the fault of the victiOf course, in any slip and fall accident case, the insurance company and later the defending attorney will try to claim that the accident was the fault of the victiof the victim.

Every case has its own uniqueness and merits that have to be pursued in terms of what the cause of the accident was, what at fault party did or didn't do, if they violated any traffic law, and the type of injury and the treatment.