It expresses concern about proposals for compensation if there is a no -
fault termination of the contract, the removal of the contractor's right to terminate the contract, and the «overly bureaucratic» requirements for the lead contractor to make all their agents and delivery partners available for audit.
The Court also rejected the contractor's claim that the municipality could not collect liquidated damages because it was at least partially at
fault for the delays in completing the project, clarifying that, if a
contract provides for an extension
of the
contract's
termination date, due to delays not caused by the contractor, then collection
of liquidated damages is not strictly abrogated under Connecticut law.