As Christie explained, RGGI is based upon
faulty economic assumptions and «does nothing more than impose a tax on electricity» for no real environmental benefit.
Not exact matches
Both answers posted so far present good points, but I believe they miss the key factor here by accepting the
faulty assumption of the question, namely, that the sanctions were the main cause of the
economic hardships that have contributed to the current protests in Iran.
Those projections are largely the result of a
faulty assumption that that all mandated carbon emissions reduction policies must be inherently costly regulations, rather than potential opportunities and incentives for productive investments with positive
economic payoffs.