Sentences with phrase «favor of a defendant after»

After a seven - day trial in which eight physicians testified, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants after deliberating for less than an hour.

The Eighth Circuit United States Court of Appeals recently released an opinion affirming a jury verdict in favor of a defendant after a trial was held on the plaintiffs» allegations surrounding the death of their 23 - month - old son.

Not exact matches

After deliberation, the jury returned a general verdict in the defendant's favor, finding that the defendant was not liable for any of the plaintiff's injuries.

House, which I think of as the innocence case, produced a 5 - 3 ruling in favor of a death row defendant's right to use DNA evidence to try to establish his innocence 20 years after his original conviction.

After deliberating about 3 hours, the jury found in favor of the defendants, The Cochran Firm Atlanta saying Hutchins was not owed any money from The Firm.

After a five day trial, the case went to verdict and the jury found in favor of the defendant.

After a jury returned a verdict in favor of the doctor in a medical malpractice case, an estate executor appealed on two questions of abuse of discretion: limitations on the scope of questions during the defendant's deposition, and refusal of jury instructions tendered by the plaintiff.

After giving defendants a glimmer of hope that Canadian class action law would become less plaintiff - friendly, Canadian courts have more recently returned to their longstanding approach favoring class actions.

Earlier this month, an appellate court in Idaho issued a written opinion affirming a jury's verdict in favor of a man who lost his wife to a serious infection after undergoing a procedure at the defendant's cosmetic clinic.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger, No. 15 - 1406 (SCOTUS April 18, 2017), clarified the standard to be used by district judges in imposing «inherent power of the court to control judicial process» sanctions as far as setting an appropriate amount of sanctions, reversing a $ 2.7 million sanctions award in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Goodyear after a case was settled.

An Indiana bicycle accident claim will go no further after the Indiana Court of Appeals ruled the trial court was wrong to deny summary judgment favoring the defendant city.

State Supreme Court Holds in Favor of Plaintiff after Finding Defendant Withheld Information During Pre-Trial Discovery

After multi-day trial, obtained judgment defeating lease termination challenge together with substantial money judgment in favor of defendant against major golf retail company for non-compliance with lease.

¶ 1 After purchasing a home in Enid, Oklahoma, Plaintiff Jason Stauff (Buyer) filed an action alleging violations of Oklahoma's Residential Property Condition Disclosure Act (Disclosure Act) and negligence against the sellers, real estate broker, and home inspectors.1 Buyer appeals a single trial court order granting 1) summary judgment in favor of Defendants Kimberly Bartnick and her husband, Roy Bartnick (collectively the Bartnicks or Sellers) and also 2) the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to 12 O.S. 2011 2012 (B)(6) filed by Defendant Paramount Homes Real Estate Co. (Broker or Paramount).