Earlier this month, the Supreme Court of South Carolina decided a case in
favor of a plaintiff who lost her husband in a tragic equipment - related accident.
$ 210,000 verdict — Intentional Tort — jury award by twelve person jury in
favor of plaintiff who sustained a spiral or rotational fracture of her finger which prevented her from continuing in her chosen line of work as a dental hygienist.
The case was a victory in
favor of the plaintiffs who suffered unjustly from Barnett's extreme and hateful antics.
A court of appeals in California recently released an opinion in a personal injury lawsuit that reversed a jury verdict in
favor of a plaintiff who sustained injuries when he was struck by a vehicle being driven by an employee of the defendant as he returned from work.
A Dutch court classifies Bitcoin as a «transferable value», after it ruled in
favor of a plaintiff who was owed 0.591 Bitcoins (BTC).
Not exact matches
The decision (PDF), in a case brought by the American Bar Association — which I'm sure has been receiving thank - you notes from grateful solo practitioners
who now need not spend a lot
of time drafting identity theft detection protocols — is worded fairly strongly in
favor of the
plaintiffs.
On Oct. 5, 2015, Superior Court Judge Raymond M. Cadei in Sacramento, Calif., entered the stipulated judgment against Bluford in
favor of the married
plaintiffs who turned to Bluford and another company
of his, California Legal Pros, for help evicting a tenant from a home they owned in Discovery Bay, Calif., only to be defrauded out
of more than half a million dollars.
Recently, the Indiana Court
of Appeals ruled in
favor of a premises liability
plaintiff who alleged she was seriously injured when she tripped and fell on a missed step at an aviation company during an open house with her young grandson.
In this six - week jury trial, the trial judge refused to dismiss at least three jurors
who were related to or knew members
of the
plaintiff class, and the jury found in
favor of the
plaintiff class.
The jury had decided the case in
favor of plaintiff,
who alleged negligence, negligence per se and intentional infliction
of emotional distress, concluding also that defendant nursing home had acted with reckless disregard for the rights
of others, resulting in a $ 10,000 punitive damage award tacked onto the $ 1.2 million in compensatory damages.
Mecox Realty Corp. v. Rose (202 A.D. 2d 404) judgment in
favor of plaintiff to recover brokerage commission affirmed, where broker earned commission when they produced a buyer
who was ready, willing and able to purchase at the terms set by the seller.