Not exact matches
If the class - action lawsuit
against Honda, Nissan, Toyota and Ford rules in
favor of the
plaintiffs he notion
of making money at all costs will also prove to be catastrophic at these companies.
When the International Trade Court ruled in
favor of plaintiffs Suniva and SolarWorld in their case
against cheap Chinese solar module and cell imports, reactions were polarized: the U.S. solar industry was outraged — as it had been for most
of the duration
of the court investigation — and investors, apparently, were extremely upbeat for the future
of this same outraged industry, sending solar stocks sky - high.
A number
of witnesses were to testify in
favor of a marriage equality plank in the platform: Marc Solomon, national campaign director for Freedom to Marry; Allison Herwitt, legislative director for the Human Rights Campaign; Army Chief Warrant Officer Charlie Morgan, a lesbian New Hampshire guardsman with stage - four incurable breast cancer and a
plaintiff in Servicemembers Legal Defense Network's lawsuit
against the Defense
of Marriage Act; Michael Macleod - Ball, the American Civil Liberties Union's chief
of staff for the Washington Legislative Office; and Aaron Zellhoefer, a gay delegate to the Democratic National Convention representing the National Stonewall Democrats.
If you were served with a complaint but ignored it or failed to appear in court, the judge will most likely enter a default judgment
against you in
favor of the
plaintiff and the
plaintiff wins by default.
Plaintiff hereby consents to a judgment
against him and in
favor of the United States Department
of Education in the amount
of $ 4,800.00 as
of December 3, 2012, This consent judgment is subject the terms set forth below.
In the last two months, February and March 2018, multiple climate change accountability lawsuits moved forward: the New York Attorney General's argument
against Exxon was bolstered by the Second Circuit Citizen's United decision, the Federal Government's writ
of mandamus was rejected in
favor of the children
plaintiffs in the Juliana case, and in The People...
On Oct. 5, 2015, Superior Court Judge Raymond M. Cadei in Sacramento, Calif., entered the stipulated judgment
against Bluford in
favor of the married
plaintiffs who turned to Bluford and another company
of his, California Legal Pros, for help evicting a tenant from a home they owned in Discovery Bay, Calif., only to be defrauded out
of more than half a million dollars.
As America's most - cited judge, Judge Richard Posner, put it last year, «Judges have difficulty understanding modern technology and jurors have even greater difficulty, yet patent
plaintiffs tend to request trial by jury because they believe that jurors tend to
favor patentees, believing that they must be worthy inventors defending the fruits
of their invention
against copycats -LSB-...]».
Lead trial counsel for
plaintiffs in both the preliminary and final injunction hearings
of Evans v. Romer, a successful suit challenging the constitutionality
of a widely - publicized amendment to Colorado's constitution that would have prohibited any legislation protecting
against discrimination based on sexual orientation; case received nationwide press coverage in broadcast and print media, including live coverage on Court TV, and was ultimately decided in
plaintiffs»
favor in the U. S. Supreme Court.
$ 85,000 Verdict in
favor of steel fabricator
Plaintiff in a breach
of contract action
against Defendant for failure to pay for steel used in the creation
of a United Airlines Terminal vestibule at O'Hare Airport.
However, the trial judge also awarded $ 54,771.25
against plaintiffs and in
favor of the defense across - the - board.
We proved that the batteries were not defective and obtained a judgment
against plaintiff on all claims and in
favor of amounts owed to our client.
Chalfin v Jerkins Michigan Court
of Appeals Docket No 274168 (March 25, 2008)(affirming decision by trial court to award sanctions
against plaintiff's counsel and in
favor of client under MCR 2.114 and MCL 600.2591)
What happened below was that a trial judge erroneously failed to honor
plaintiff's dismissal
of an action, striking it and then going forward to award discovery sanctions and attorney's fees
against plaintiff and in
favor of the defendant.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger, No. 15 - 1406 (SCOTUS April 18, 2017), clarified the standard to be used by district judges in imposing «inherent power
of the court to control judicial process» sanctions as far as setting an appropriate amount
of sanctions, reversing a $ 2.7 million sanctions award in
favor of plaintiff and
against defendant Goodyear after a case was settled.
The court ruled in
favor of the brokers
against the
plaintiffs.
¶ 1 After purchasing a home in Enid, Oklahoma,
Plaintiff Jason Stauff (Buyer) filed an action alleging violations
of Oklahoma's Residential Property Condition Disclosure Act (Disclosure Act) and negligence
against the sellers, real estate broker, and home inspectors.1 Buyer appeals a single trial court order granting 1) summary judgment in
favor of Defendants Kimberly Bartnick and her husband, Roy Bartnick (collectively the Bartnicks or Sellers) and also 2) the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to 12 O.S. 2011 2012 (B)(6) filed by Defendant Paramount Homes Real Estate Co. (Broker or Paramount).