The court agreed with the plaintiff, reversing a lower court that had granted summary judgment in
favor of the defendant doctor.
Not exact matches
In 2013, there were 20 medical malpractice cases that went to trial, with 11
of those cases being decided in the
favor of the
defendant (meaning the
doctor won at the trial level).
After a jury returned a verdict in
favor of the
doctor in a medical malpractice case, an estate executor appealed on two questions
of abuse
of discretion: limitations on the scope
of questions during the
defendant's deposition, and refusal
of jury instructions tendered by the plaintiff.
I suppose there could be valid reasons why 4 out
of every 5 jury verdicts go in
favor of the
doctor or hospital — maybe the strongest cases are all being settled before trial, leaving only the weakest cases behind — but it's hard to say that with a straight face when those figures mean that malpractice
defendants have better odds winning in a courtroom than the odds a casino has winning its own games.
«Having found that [
defendant] father and son relationship has been damaged by the alienation
of the child toward the
defendant, the next logical step is to determine what the court must do to correct the situation... «[Father's motion to modify from joint custody to sole legal custody in his
favor, granted; prohibitions
of various alienating behaviors on the part
of mother and her family; restrictions on mother's attendance at
doctor visits and parent - teacher conferences.