After a seven - day trial in which eight physicians testified, the jury returned a verdict in
favor of the defendants after deliberating for less than an hour.
The Eighth Circuit United States Court of Appeals recently released an opinion affirming a jury verdict in
favor of a defendant after a trial was held on the plaintiffs» allegations surrounding the death of their 23 - month - old son.
Not exact matches
After deliberation, the jury returned a general verdict in the
defendant's
favor, finding that the
defendant was not liable for any
of the plaintiff's injuries.
House, which I think
of as the innocence case, produced a 5 - 3 ruling in
favor of a death row
defendant's right to use DNA evidence to try to establish his innocence 20 years
after his original conviction.
After deliberating about 3 hours, the jury found in
favor of the
defendants, The Cochran Firm Atlanta saying Hutchins was not owed any money from The Firm.
After a five day trial, the case went to verdict and the jury found in
favor of the
defendant.
After a jury returned a verdict in
favor of the doctor in a medical malpractice case, an estate executor appealed on two questions
of abuse
of discretion: limitations on the scope
of questions during the
defendant's deposition, and refusal
of jury instructions tendered by the plaintiff.
After giving
defendants a glimmer
of hope that Canadian class action law would become less plaintiff - friendly, Canadian courts have more recently returned to their longstanding approach
favoring class actions.
Earlier this month, an appellate court in Idaho issued a written opinion affirming a jury's verdict in
favor of a man who lost his wife to a serious infection
after undergoing a procedure at the
defendant's cosmetic clinic.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Haeger, No. 15 - 1406 (SCOTUS April 18, 2017), clarified the standard to be used by district judges in imposing «inherent power
of the court to control judicial process» sanctions as far as setting an appropriate amount
of sanctions, reversing a $ 2.7 million sanctions award in
favor of plaintiff and against
defendant Goodyear
after a case was settled.
An Indiana bicycle accident claim will go no further
after the Indiana Court
of Appeals ruled the trial court was wrong to deny summary judgment
favoring the
defendant city.
State Supreme Court Holds in
Favor of Plaintiff
after Finding
Defendant Withheld Information During Pre-Trial Discovery
After multi-day trial, obtained judgment defeating lease termination challenge together with substantial money judgment in
favor of defendant against major golf retail company for non-compliance with lease.
¶ 1
After purchasing a home in Enid, Oklahoma, Plaintiff Jason Stauff (Buyer) filed an action alleging violations
of Oklahoma's Residential Property Condition Disclosure Act (Disclosure Act) and negligence against the sellers, real estate broker, and home inspectors.1 Buyer appeals a single trial court order granting 1) summary judgment in
favor of Defendants Kimberly Bartnick and her husband, Roy Bartnick (collectively the Bartnicks or Sellers) and also 2) the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to 12 O.S. 2011 2012 (B)(6) filed by
Defendant Paramount Homes Real Estate Co. (Broker or Paramount).