Sentences with phrase «favor of the seller»

The trial court ruled in favor of the seller, and the brokerage appealed.

Thus, the court affirmed the trial court's ruling in favor of the Seller, denying the Brokerage a commission.

For other cryptocurrencies, the scale has tipped in favor of the sellers because there is now a dearth of buyers.

It was a normal market that leaned in favor of sellers with the monthly inventory ranging from 3.9 to 5.4 months of supply.

By «worse,» Coneway means the market could become more out of balance in favor of sellers during this year's spring homebuying season.

THEY RULED IN FAVOR OF THE SELLER.

The «days on market» number is ridiculously in favor of the seller.

Complex investment products are designed more in favor of their sellers.

There are several standard templates that Realtors and Attorneys utilize, and these templates may tilt in specific sections in favor of the seller or buyer.

Sales are heavily slanted to the favor of the seller?

The trial court and then the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division, found in favor of the sellers.

The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of the Sellers and dismissed the lawsuit against the Broker.

In reversing the decision of the Superior Court in favor of the seller and his broker, the Arizona Supreme Court stated: «It is immaterial as to whether the broker is a member of the National Association if it is established that this Association Code of Ethics is applicable to those in the real estate profession in this state.»

Therefore, the court ruled in favor of the Sellers and so judgment was entered on behalf of the Sellers, Salesperson, Brokerage, and the Buyer's Representative.

The trial court overruled a jury verdict in favor of the Buyers and entered judgment in favor of the Seller and Broker, due to the Buyers» failure to present expert testimony on the property's diminution in value due to the defects.

Finding nothing in Hawaiian law that required a seller to disclose these off - site conditions, the court affirmed the trial court's ruling in favor of the Seller and the Brokerage.

The trial court ruled in favor of the seller, finding that the listing agreement was ambiguous and so should be construed against the drafter, which was the Salesperson.

Thus, the court affirmed the trial court's rulings in favor of the Seller and the Brokerage.

The case went to a jury, and the jury returned a verdict in favor of the Sellers and the Brokerage.

Since the jury had found that the Sellers and Brokerage had fulfilled this obligation, the court affirmed the verdict in favor of the Sellers and the Brokerage.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Seller and the Brokerage.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Seller, and the Brokerage appealed.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Sellers.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Seller, and the Buyer's Representative appealed.

The trial court ruled in favor of the Sellers, and the Buyers appealed.

Thus, the court affirmed the lower court rulings in favor of the Sellers.

Thus, the court affirmed judgment in favor of the Sellers.

As the contract progresses and the Buyer passes each step or deadline the earnest money becomes more hard until finally at the end of the transaction the pendulum swings in favor of the Seller.

A trial court ruled in favor of the sellers, holding that the buyers and the brokers were liable, either jointly or individually, for damages of $ 14,437, costs of approximately $ 3,500, and attorney fees of $ 22,500.