Not exact matches
In a population - based Canadian study of children with epilepsy, each of whom had access to universal
health care, those from poor
families had the same medical course and remission rate as their wealthier counterparts, but they had a less
favorable social outcome as adults.
On the HealthLawProf Blog, law professor Leslie Francis writes that, although the Fifth Circuit ruling «is apparently a
favorable one for women and children, it also reveals ongoing mismatches between anti-discrimination law in the US and the
health needs of workers and their
families.»
I'm not sure how a
family court judge would react to a non-custodial parent who opposed a relocation that was based on a child's
health needs or vocational interests (assuming the judge believed this was the true reason the relocation was requested) but I assume it would not be
favorable.
Besides the risks associated with excess alcohol intake, the underwriter also considers
favorable historical items such as: active participation in Alcoholics Anonymous, voluntary initiation of treatment, single period of treatment or hospitalization, maintenance of stable
family life, sustained employment, financial solvency, and good
health without reports of violence or arrests.
In the Infant
Health and Development program, mothers in the intervention group engaged in higher - quality interactions with their infants, though the effects were small.82 In New Zealand, Early Start documented higher positive parenting attitudes, a greater prevalence of nonpunitive attitudes, and more
favorable overall parenting scores for
families in the treatment group.83 In Queensland, mothers in the intervention group were rated as significantly higher in emotional and verbal responsivity.84
Five programs showed
favorable effects in some aspect of child maltreatment reduction: (1) Child FIRST showed a
favorable effect on
family involvement with child protective services53; (2) Early Start on 2 measures, including the percentage who went to the hospital for accident, injury, or accidental poisoning, and parents» report of severe or very severe physical assault25, 26; (3) EHS had a
favorable effect on physical punishment at 36 months66; (4) HFA showed 14
favorable impacts on measures of parenting behaviors, such as corporal punishment, self - reported serious physical abuse, and aggression, 30,50,67 — 69 and 1 measure of the biological mother as a confirmed subject of sexual abuse report by the child's seventh birthday50; and (5) NFP had
favorable effects on 7 measures, including
health care encounters for injuries or ingestions and substantiated abuse or neglect 15 years after program enrollment.34, 35,42,70,71 One program, Healthy Steps, showed no effect on 1 measure in this domain.65
We hypothesized that
families exposed to HS would continue to report
favorable parenting practices regarding their children's behavior but would not experience differences in seeking
health care for their children, because of changes in primary care providers and staff turnover.
EIP showed
favorable impacts on 8 outcomes, including fewer days and episodes of hospitalization, relative to those in the comparison group, covering a range of 6 weeks to 2 years postpartum.13, 23,24 EIP also showed a
favorable effect on the percentage of children who were adequately immunized by 1 year, but the difference was no longer statistically significant by 2 years.13, 24 Early Start demonstrated
favorable effects on 3 outcomes, including percentage who received well - child visits and dental service.25 — 27 HFA had
favorable results for 4
health care outcomes, such as the number of well - child visits and whether the child had
health insurance.28 — 31 HFA had an unfavorable effect on the number of pediatric emergency department (ED) visits.32 The research showed that Healthy Steps had a beneficial effect on 2 outcomes: 1 - month well - child visits and diphtheria toxoid, tetanus toxoid, and pertussis vaccinations.33 Finally, NFP had
favorable results on 3 outcomes measuring the number of ED visits at different follow - ups but an unfavorable / ambiguous effect on number of days hospitalized between 25 and 50 months.34, 35 The research on 2 programs (Oklahoma's CBFRS and PAT) showed no effects on measures of
health care use or coverage.36 — 40 The research on 5 programs (Child FIRST, EHS,
Family Check - Up, HIPPY, and PALS for Infants) did not report
health care coverage or usage outcomes.
Intervention
families at 5.5 years continued to report more -
favorable experiences seeking
health care for their children than did control
families.
Whereas adolescents from democratic households reported the most
favorable health outcomes, adolescents from authoritarian, overprotective, and psychologically controlling
families (all characterized by relatively high levels of psychological control) showed an increased risk for poor perceived
health over time.