New York - A lawyer for state Sen. Carl Kruger said Saturday that prosecutors have cleared the lawmaker of allegations that he traded bureaucratic
favors for campaign contributions.
Not exact matches
The probe is examining whether donors to de Blasio's mayoral run and his nonprofit,
Campaign for One New York, received any
favors in exchange
for their
contributions.
There is a federal investigation into whether donors to the
Campaign for One New York, a nonprofit the mayor started to advance his political agenda, received
favors in exchange
for their
contributions.
«Gifts,
favors, and
campaign contributions are not a legitimate basis
for government contracts or special treatment,» said Cuomo.
Catsimatidis also gave to de Blasio's now - defunct political nonprofit, the
Campaign for One New York, an organization U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara is now probing to determine if the mayor traded city
favors for contributions.
A month earlier, Sen. Robert Menendez, D - N.J., was indicted
for allegedly exchanging
favors for gifts and
campaign contributions.
Singh secretly pleaded guilty in 2016 to bribing de Blasio with
campaign contributions in exchange
for official
favors involving his since - shuttered Water's Edge restaurant in Queens.
Federal prosecutors alleged that Menedez carried out «official
favors»
for his friend and Democratic donor Melgen in exchange
for private jet flights, vacations, and hundreds of thousands of dollars in
campaign contributions.
U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, who is probing de Blasio's
campaign fundraising activities, is trying to determine if there were any quid - pro-quos, with donors receiving
favors in return
for their
contributions.
As part of his deal to testify against Mangano, Singh pleaded guilty to bribing de Blasio with
campaign contributions in exchange
for official
favors involving a restaurant, Water's Edge, that he formerly operated in Queens.
HARLEM — Voters believe that Mayor Bill de Blasio «does
favors for developers who make political
contributions to
campaigns in which he is involved,» but a majority feel the activities are just unethical and not illegal, a new poll shows.
Other surveys, such as this one by the Committee on Economic Development demonstrate support
for reform is also strong in the business community; 72 percent are in
favor of creating a public financing system that would match low - dollar
contributions and give average citizens more incentives to contribute to
campaigns.
The federal proceedings concern whether the administration doled out «pay - to - play»
favors to big donors that dumped money into de Blasio's now - defunct «shadow government» nonprofit, the
Campaign for One New York — Vance's case concerns allegations the mayor sought to circumvent state contribution limits in his failed bid to turn the State Senate Democratic, by having people seeking city business funnel unlimited cash into upstate county committees instead of into candidates» campaign a
Campaign for One New York — Vance's case concerns allegations the mayor sought to circumvent state
contribution limits in his failed bid to turn the State Senate Democratic, by having people seeking city business funnel unlimited cash into upstate county committees instead of into candidates»
campaign a
campaign accounts.
Menendez is accused of carrying out «official
favors»
for his friend, Florida eye doctor Salomon Melgen, in exchange
for private jet flights, vacations, and hundreds of thousands of dollars in
campaign contributions.
Hevesi also acknowledged roughly $ 900,000 in other
favors the businessman did
for him or others in his orbit, including a total of $ 500,000 in
campaign contributions to Hevesi and other candidates he or his staff suggested.
This is usually how it goes: politician wannabe gets
campaign contributions from private sector guy, gets into office, legislates in
favor of private sector guy, private sector guy contributes more, politician guy takes vacation in Italy (or goes
for a hike on the Appalachian trail)... gets re-elected, the word gets out that he «plays,» more private sector guys contribute to his
campaign, voters are pleased to see the name of their representative in print, like the new wardrobe, the new hairstyle, believe all change is good and re-elect the politician again... politician feels the power, creates agency to watch over private sector guy, agency takes fact - finding trip to France... raises taxes on private sector guy, writes legislation that taxes private sector guy if his plant emits CO2 while producing widgets... voters are in awe and re-elect the politician... private sector guy whines, politician makes him ambassador to Taiwan, limits how much the new private guy taking his place can earn, and taxes all widgets so new private guy will make more environmentally friendly ones... voters swoon, pay more
for widgets, lose job in widget factory, hate private guy, re-elect their pol... politician buries $ 5 billion aid to Taiwan in next appropriation bill...... kind of makes a case
for term limits, doesn't it.
All these specious claims
for wind energy are simply part of a long line of snake oil sales spiels — intended to fool the public, and to enable politicians to justify
favoring special interests by enriching various rent - seekers (which will then return the
favor via
campaign contributions and other reelection support).