It is time for Canada's elected representatives from all parties to hear the voice of the Canadian public, to stand up for the best interests of children and to resist vested interests by voting in
favour of Bill C - 560 at 2nd reading.
Long - time supporters of the New Democratic Party, Liberals, Conservatives, Bloc Québécois and the Green Party, from every region across the country, have been calling their elected representatives to stand up for the best interest of Canada's children in a divorce by voting in
favour of Bill C - 560.
The third criteria was whether the MP voted in
favour of Bill C - 484 Unborn Victims of Crime Act on March 5, 2008.
The Coalition does note that some pro-choice MPs did vote in
favour of Bill C - 484, which reveals the uncertainties in predicting a politician's stance on such a divisive policy.
More than 80 Members of Parliament voted in
favour of Bill C - 246, the Modernizing Animal Protections Act, at second reading in the House of Commons.
Not exact matches
C - 229 &
C - 468: The NDP is in
favour of these two
bills.
The Liberal Government has said it wants to kill
Bill C - 246 in
favour of a larger review
of the whole Criminal Code — blatantly ignoring the fact that this
Bill emerged out
of a Parliamentary review
of animal cruelty in Canada and has been debated for almost 20 years.
Remarkably, even though Prime Minister Harper and his government, officially, have opposed
Bill C - 279, it was not a whipped vote in the House
of Commons and 18 government MPs (including four Ministers at the time) voted in
favour of its adoption.
In Fraser's view,
bill C - 377 tips the balance too strongly in
favour of employers.
Such organizations as the Canadian Equal Parenting Council, Lawyers for Shared Parenting, and Leading Women for Shared Parenting amongst others, were in the forefront
of the Canadian 2013 - 2014 campaign in support
of a private member's
Bill (
C - 560) that would have legislated a rebuttable presumption in
favour equal shared parenting.