Not exact matches
A
new survey has found MPs are largely in
favour of randomised controlled
trials, even if they don't understand why.
Thankfully, the Superior Court found in
favour of the self - represented defendant («allowed the appeal»), even if the appeal resulted in a
new trial.
While Canadian judges, like their Commonwealth siblings, are unwilling to adopt a
New York Times v. Sullivan6 - type approach to defamation law (which would require public figure plaintiffs to prove actual malice in order to be successful at
trial), doctrinal and technological developments point in
favour of an adapted cause
of action for public figure plaintiffs under Canadian law.
In Bentley v. Anglican Synod
of the Diocese
of New Westminster, the B.C. Court
of Appeal ruled in
favour of the Anglican Church
of Canada, and the
trial judge in Delicata referred to the following paragraph in Bentley in his decision over the charitable purpose trust advanced by the congregation: