Sentences with phrase «favour of the employer»

It aims to tackle «one - sided flexibility» in favour of employers in the labour market.

Applying that to the question of firing employees for their «bad» behaviour off the job: If you think you are in favour of an employer feeling free to fire an employee for behaviour that you think despicable, ask whether you would like employers to follow the same standard when the behaviour in question is one with which you're sympathetic.

The policy considerations applied in Machtinger would not be served if the contract were to be interpreted in favour of the employer so as to leave the individual employee responsible for determining, at the point of termination, whether the statutory minimum had risen above the notice period stated in the contract.

While the law on this issue remains unsettled, this decision is a positive development in favour of employers looking to terminate employees who are unable to work over the notice period.

The majority's decision in Coast Capital has moved the needle in favour of the employer in British Columbia.

Former Labour minister Alan Johnson - a former union leader - contends that the bill is «spiteful» and designed to «gerrymander votes in favour of the employer and against the employee».

In all cases, the authorities passed judgment in favour of the employers, and the «national identity» post-Brexit, may lean further in this direction.

That said, there have been a number of decisions in the past couple of years which have upheld arguably unlawful termination clauses in favour of employers, thus creating uncertainty for employees and a possible incentive for employers to not even meet minimum ESA requirements for severance.

Employers and workers alike must appreciate that a WSIB ruling in favour of an employer's accommodation efforts is not necessarily the final word that the accommodation is adequate, Conlin explains.

The Trust and Accounting Approach — The employee is granted judgment but a trust in favour of the employer is impressed on the judgment funds for the balance of the notice period requiring the employee to account for any mitigatory earnings.

Some opponents to the Bill think that it will erode union power and tilt the playing field drastically in favour of employers.

Conventional wisdom postulates a power disparity in favour of employers.

Haddon - Cave J gives a helpful summary of the significant cases, noting that there has been a «tightening of the law» in favour of the employer.

In Fraser's view, bill C - 377 tips the balance too strongly in favour of employers.

The Union submitted that to allow the Employer to use video evidence without subjecting that evidence to the reasonableness test would shift the balance in favour of the Employer.