Matterhorn - enabled courts expand access for citizens who can not miss work, school, or family care to attend court, or who
fear coming to court because of their race, ethnicity, or immigration status.
Not exact matches
In addition
to the institutional or parliamentary purists and those who
feared the sort of innovation associated with the American Supreme
Court, there were still other premiers who simply felt that duly elected legislatures were better positioned than appointed judges when it
came to the matter of protecting individual and community rights.
Justice Antonin Scalia opened the Supreme
Court's new term Tuesday by questioning whether a man deported
to Mexico after a drug conviction would be «abstaining from tequila» for
fear of violating his U.S. parole terms.The remark
came as justices heard an immigration case involving a Texas man, Reymundo Toledo - Flores, who was deported in April after being convicted of illegally entering the United States.
The June 29, 2017 unanimous Supreme
Court decision in Rodriquez v. Zavala unequivocally establishes that exposure
to domestic violence harms children and that a parent's
fear of harm for a child
comes within the definition of «domestic violence» for purposes of a petition for a domestic violence protection order.
These
fears derive from some of the early U.S. cases in which parties
came to court complaining of potential costs in the millions (for restoring all backup tape sets or searching through all data on a network) and those cases, having been reported, are clearly going
to discourage any party from confidently moving forward with an ediscovery plan in hand.
We
fear that if the first challenge
to a warrant canary
comes before a
court in a more rushed context, a rushed judge could make bad law.