In one village, 30 % of those babies
fed formula died, none breastfed.
Not exact matches
Babies
fed on
formula are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
At past shareholder meetings, the Chair repeatedly defended promoting infant
formula with strategies such as logos on labels claiming «protects» babies, despite knowing that babies
fed on breastmilk substitutes are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
Mr. Brabeck knows babies
fed on
formula are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
As Mr Bulcke knows, babies
fed on
formula are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
In reality babies
fed on
formula are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
As much as they claim to be victimised for public breastfeeding, FFing parents are frequently compared to child abusers, told that they are
feeding their babies poison, that they don't deserve to have children and shown sensationalist «infographics» like the ones a few posts back which stated that
formula fed babies are x times more likely to
die within the first year of life without even accounting for the numerous confounding factors that would cause those numbers to be elevated in the first place.
So babies that are more likely to
die in the first year of life are also more likely to be
formula fed.
fed babies
die, then I blame the milk in
formula.
We have seen millions of babies happily grow into adults and
die an old age after being
fed formula.
To promote
formula around the world claiming it will «protect» babies is the height of irresponsibility when it is well known that babies who are
fed on
formula rather than breastfed are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
It is undisputed that babies
fed on
formula are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
Studies in South America and Africa showed that babies who were
fed formula instead of breast milk were more likely to
die.
Some mothers aren't able to breast
feed for medical reasons, so «wishing a gene pool would
die off» because a family has to rely on
formula vs. breast milk is absurd and to dignify that comment with more time - well it would probably be inappropriate.
Mr Brabeck knows that babies
fed on
formula are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
It has been estimated that more than 900 children in the U.S.
die each year because they have been
fed with infant
formula.
I took a lot of flak for that and because of the nasty comments I received (including a horrible woman who flat - out told me my baby would probably
die of a horrible plague because I was using
formula instead of breast milk and robbing him of antibodies), I am actually very passionate about letting women know it's okay to choose to
formula feed, that it is nothing to be ashamed of.
Babies who are breastfed are more easily roused from sleep than
formula -
fed babies, which may be a reason breastfed babies are less likely to
die from SIDS.
I expect this one to cause some controversy, but babies who are
formula fed do have a higher chance of
dying from SIDS.
He can look at the picture of a child who
died from unsafe bottle
feeding and still justify in his own mind promoting
formula with the claims it «protects» babies and is the «gentle start».
Babies
fed on
formula are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies (the true «natural start») and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
He spoke out because he saw too many children
die of malnutrition and diarrhea after being
fed Nestle
formula recommended by corrupt doctors and misleading and aggressive advertising.
Nestlé knows that babies
fed on
formula are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
Nestlé executives at the highest level of the company have refused to stop this process even though they know that babies
fed on
formula are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
Mr Brabeck refuses to change company marketing strategies, despite knowing that babies
fed on
formula are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
It does this even though it knows babies
fed on
formula are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
Children
fed on
formula are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
I showed the picture of a child who
died from unsafe bottle
feeding to the Nestlé Chairman, Peter Brabeck - Letmathé, and 2,446 shareholders at the company's shareholder meeting this month (16 April) and asked him to stop promoting
formula in Bangladesh with the «gentle start» claim and abide by the UN minimum marketing standards there and everywhere.
Despite Nestlé's claims, babies
fed on
formula are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
Nestlé's baby milk marketing was also raised by Mike Brady at the Nestlé shareholder meeting on 16 April, when he showed shareholders a picture of a child that
died after becoming sick through unsafe
formula feeding, one of the case studies in a 2014 report from the Bangaldesh Paediatric Association.
Babies who are
fed on
formula are more likely to become sick than breastfed babies and, in conditions of poverty, more likely to
die.
And actually, babies do
die of being
formula -
fed.
The controversy over baby - friendly hospitals was drawn into sharp relief in early 2017, when
Fed Is Best, a non-profit that supports
formula supplementation, published a story by Jillian Johnson, a mother whose baby Landon
died in a BFHI.
An investigation of the post-flood death of more than 500 children in Botswana in 2005 - 2006 found that nearly all the babies who
died were
formula -
fed.
Venneman and colleagues5 recently demonstrated that infants who are
formula fed are twice as likely to
die of SIDS than breastfed infants based on a case control study of 333 SIDS cases compared to 998 aged matched controls in Germany, from 1998 - 2001, consistent with previously published reports.35 While no studies show that co-sleeping in the form of bedsharing, specifically, is imperative for breastfeeding enhancement, many studies have shown that in order to get more sleep and to ease caring for their infants the decision to breastfeed often leads mothers to adopt routine bedsharing for at least part of the night36 - 40 even where they never intended to do so.41, 42 Indeed, nearly 50 % of breastfeeding mothers in the United States and Great Britain adopt bedsharing for some part of the night,38,43 - 45 and breastfeeding women are twice as likely to sleep with their babies in the first month relative to mothers electing to bottle -
feed.39
Why is it that when the baby of a smoking,
formula feeding mother
dies in a crib that is full of stuffed toys and bumpers no one ever accuses her of taking a risk with her child's life, yet parents who make educated, informed decisions to co sleep and lose a child are lamb basted?
«
Formula -
fed babies are sicker, sick more often, and are more likely to
die in infancy or childhood.