For some unexplained reason,
the federal judicial code does not.
Not exact matches
«Council also decided to give Hon. Justice Adolphus Enebeli serious warning and place him on its «Watch - List» for three years following its «findings» that Hon. Justice Enebeli violated the
Code of Conduct for
Judicial Officers of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria by granting ex-parte order in Suit No.
The adjudicator appointed under the Canada
Code agreed with him but reserved judgment regarding remedy when AECL sought
judicial review of the decision before the
Federal Court.
In parallel, the
judicial commission of the States Council also submitted a «postulat» in March 2016 requesting the
Federal Council to elaborate a report on the issue of the privilege for in - house lawyers and to come up with solutions, for instance, in the framework of the future revision of the Swiss Civil Procedure
Code or the Swiss Criminal Procedure
Code.
In a
judicial review, the
Federal Court of Canada disagreed, setting out the following regime for dismissals under the
Code: An employer can dismiss an employee without cause so long as it gives notice or severance pay.
First, the U.S.
Judicial Conference should amend the judicial code for lower court federal judges to bar independent fact r
Judicial Conference should amend the
judicial code for lower court federal judges to bar independent fact r
judicial code for lower court
federal judges to bar independent fact research.
Federal Magistrate Judge Andrew Peck's decision in Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe (Southern District of New York, 2012) is considered the first official
judicial endorsement of predictive
coding as a way to review documents.
The Courts provided for in subsection A of this section, when exercising their
judicial authority, shall uphold and adhere to the law as provided in the United States Constitution, the Oklahoma Constitution, the United States
Code,
federal regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, established common law, the Oklahoma Statutes and rules promulgated pursuant thereto, and if necessary the law of another state of the United States provided the law of the other state does not include Sharia Law, in making
judicial decisions.
Supreme Court has won a decision in
federal court that would repeal provisions of the
Judicial Conduct Code and allow judges and judicial candidates to name their party affiliation and express their views on controversial topics like a
Judicial Conduct
Code and allow judges and
judicial candidates to name their party affiliation and express their views on controversial topics like a
judicial candidates to name their party affiliation and express their views on controversial topics like abortion.
Anyone who is an officer of the
federal judicial system authorized to perform
judicial functions is a judge for the purpose of this
Code.
The courts provided for in this section, when exercising their
judicial authority, shall uphold and adhere to the law as provided in the United States Constitution, the Constitution of Missouri, the United States
Code,
federal regulations promulgated pursuant thereto, and if necessary the law of another state of the United States, provided the law of the other state does not include sharia law, in making
judicial decisions.
The
code of
judicial conduct bars
federal judges from using the prestige of their office for fundraising purposes.
Rambo's article notes that «surprisingly, most of the state and
federal courts deciding
judicial discipline cases based on extrajudicial speech have not addressed the constitutionality of the
code provisions involved.»