DECEMBER: The New York City district and union lose out on $ 60 million in
federal School Improvement Grant funding after failing to reach agreements on teacher - evaluation details.
In Dayton, Ohio, three schools — Dunbar High School, Belmont High School and Meadowdale High School — received
federal School Improvement Grant funds.
Not exact matches
Under the terms of
federal School Improvement Grants that the DOE was awarded to help these schools succeed, the school district and the union must jointly develop a teacher evaluation system in low - achieving schools that receive the
School Improvement Grants that the DOE was awarded to help these
schools succeed, the
school district and the union must jointly develop a teacher evaluation system in low - achieving schools that receive the
school district and the union must jointly develop a teacher evaluation system in low - achieving
schools that receive the
funds.
Schools Chancellor Dennis M. Walcott and UFT President Michael Mulgrew on July 15 announced an important agreement that will help secure up to $ 65 million over the next two years in federal School Improvement Grants, a U.S. Department of Education program that provides funding to help transform our nation's struggling s
Schools Chancellor Dennis M. Walcott and UFT President Michael Mulgrew on July 15 announced an important agreement that will help secure up to $ 65 million over the next two years in
federal School Improvement Grants, a U.S. Department of Education program that provides
funding to help transform our nation's struggling
schoolsschools.
The city DOE and United Federation of Teachers had spent weeks in closed door meetings trying to hammer out the details of a «meaningful teacher evaluation system» in order to qualify for up to $ 65 million in
federal funding in
School Improvement Grants over the next two years, which is distributed by the state.
In the past,
school improvement grant money had come with little to no strong direction from the
federal government, and never with so much
funding attached.
In 2009, the
federal government overhauled the Title I
School Improvement Grant program, increased its value to $ 3.5 billion with money from the recovery act, and spelled out four turnaround options from which perennially failing
schools would have to choose to get a share of the
funding.
NCLB requires states to set aside about $ 230 million of their
federal funds for
grants to
schools in need of
improvement.
If, for example, one - third of all
schools found themselves «in need of
improvement,» then the minimum amount of
federal support required to
fund grants of $ 50,000 per
school would be $ 1.6 billion.
-- and $ 3.5 billion in designated
federal funding for
School Improvement Grants is enough to push many an edu - reformer to the brink of hubris, it's fairly clear that no one actually knows what to do.
Although the specific allocation for
school improvement grants appears to fall well short of the minimum amount required by
federal regulations, other sources of
federal funds could more than close the gap, if they were directed to low - performing
schools.
On an evaluation of the
federal Race to the Top and
School Improvement Grant initiatives, she was a content area expert advising on development of protocols, data collection instruments, and reports, examining how states and districts use grant funds to improve teacher qua
Grant initiatives, she was a content area expert advising on development of protocols, data collection instruments, and reports, examining how states and districts use
grant funds to improve teacher qua
grant funds to improve teacher quality.
Assistance from City Year Corps, which provides
schools with tutors, mentors and role models, is
funded through the
federal School Improvement Grant program.
In late 2014, the state launched a first - of - its - kind desegregation plan — the Socioeconomic Integration Pilot program — using
federal School Improvement Grant, or SIG,
funds.
The first was a quantitative analysis of student academic outcomes, comparing results for
schools that received
federal School Improvement Grant (SIG)
funding to similar
schools in the same districts that did not.
The Denver Post determined that 35 percent of the
federal funds allocated to that city in a
School Improvement Grant was spent for consultants, not for students or teachers or
schools.2
Ross C. Santy, director of EdFacts, told state and district officials who attended a National Center for Education Statistics conference in Washington, D.C., last week they would still have to report student achievement data to receive
federal funding, like Title I and
school improvement grants.
This is SIGnificant: Fix SIG, the
federal School Improvement Grant program, to ensure all
funds for low - performing
schools go for Sustainable Community S
schools go for Sustainable Community
SchoolsSchools.
May, 2011 —
Federal Fiscal Year 2010 1003 (a), project period July 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012 The application for federal fiscal year (FFY) 2010 School Improvement Grant (SIG) funds, authorized under Section 1003 (a) of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), is available to school divisions for use in Title I schools in Title I School Improvement or Title I eligible schools that meet certain cr
Federal Fiscal Year 2010 1003 (a), project period July 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012 The application for
federal fiscal year (FFY) 2010 School Improvement Grant (SIG) funds, authorized under Section 1003 (a) of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), is available to school divisions for use in Title I schools in Title I School Improvement or Title I eligible schools that meet certain cr
federal fiscal year (FFY) 2010
School Improvement Grant (SIG) funds, authorized under Section 1003 (a) of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), is available to school divisions for use in Title I schools in Title I School Improvement or Title I eligible schools that meet certain cri
School Improvement Grant (SIG)
funds, authorized under Section 1003 (a) of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), is available to
school divisions for use in Title I schools in Title I School Improvement or Title I eligible schools that meet certain cri
school divisions for use in Title I
schools in Title I
School Improvement or Title I eligible schools that meet certain cri
School Improvement or Title I eligible
schools that meet certain criteria.
The Obama administration has used
federal money for the Teacher Incentive
Fund, Race to the Top and
School Improvement Grant program to encourage policymakers in states and districts to adopt new teacher evaluations that incorporate student test scores, despite the controversy surrounding them.
Roberts was one of four
schools in the district to receive $ 2 million in
federal funding from a
School Improvement Grant.
In a letter the state department's Julia Rafael - Bar wrote to Brown on March 25 about the situation, she also said that the district could jeopardize its $ 11 million in
School Improvement Grant funding from the
federal government for 2012 - 13 (and $ 40 million over the remaining life of SIG for Buffalo) if it did not conform to state law about teacher evaluations.
One encouraging sign in these scores was some progress in nearly two dozen of the state's very lowest performing
schools that two years ago started receiving extra
federal funding under the
School Improvement Grant (SIG) program as long as they followed specific reforms.
Despite an unprecedented investment of
federal funds, 92 of California's lowest performing
schools continue to struggle to improve student performance since the 2009 relaunch of the
School Improvement Grant program.
The
federal School Improvement Grant program has been retired, and under the new Every Student Succeeds Act, districts will have more flexibility along with a percentage of
federal funds to roll out locally honed strategies for turnaround.
Schools receiving
School Improvement Grant (SIG) funds under Section 1003 (g) of ESEA in Federal Fiscal Year 2009 (Cohort I) or 2010 (Cohort II) and identified and served as a Tier I or Tier II
School Improvement Grant (SIG)
funds under Section 1003 (g) of ESEA in
Federal Fiscal Year 2009 (Cohort I) or 2010 (Cohort II) and identified and served as a Tier I or Tier II
schoolschool
The Maine Department of Education will again apply for
federal School Improvement Grant (SIG)
funding that the Department would distribute to help the state's most struggling
schools.
Since 2010, 61 low - performing
schools across the state have received more than $ 140 million in additional
funds through
federal School Improvement Grants.
School Improvement Grants 1003g and 1003a; school turnaround and transformation; effective leadership; effective instruction; using data to drive interventions; equitable and high quality programs for all learners; working in convergence at the SEA and the LEAs; sustainable practices; effective use of federal and state
School Improvement Grants 1003g and 1003a;
school turnaround and transformation; effective leadership; effective instruction; using data to drive interventions; equitable and high quality programs for all learners; working in convergence at the SEA and the LEAs; sustainable practices; effective use of federal and state
school turnaround and transformation; effective leadership; effective instruction; using data to drive interventions; equitable and high quality programs for all learners; working in convergence at the SEA and the LEAs; sustainable practices; effective use of
federal and state
funds
The U.S. Department of Education has already concluded that
federal funds under the
School Improvement Grants program can be used to promote diversity.
Click here to learn more about
School Improvement Grants and other
federal funding sources.
The
schools — located in New Orleans; Denver; Boston; Washington, D.C.; Des Moines, Iowa; Portland, Oregon; Bridgeport, Connecticut; and Lame Deer, Montana — all receive
federal School Improvement Grant (SIG)
funding.