Not exact matches
«Convergence and harmonization means... Canada bending its regulations or simply adopting U.S.
federal regulations, and I ask the question: at what point
does the narrowing of policy room to manoeuvre fundamentally compromise democratic
accountability in our political
system?»
Likewise, in a September 3, 2003, column examining the differences between state and
federal accountability systems, Winerip looked at North Carolina, where, he said, some schools that were
doing just fine under the state's previous
accountability system were now being flagged as needing improvement under NCLB.
There is no way that the
federal government can oversee and regulate the
accountability systems of 50 states and more than 16,000 local jurisdictions without reducing them to a caricature of what they were originally designed to
do.
Under present day standards and
accountability systems, states, pushed and prodded by the
federal government, have moved from trying to force districts to educate students to a minimum level of basic skills and to
do something about schools that are obviously failing, to holding districts, schools and teachers accountable for (in the words of the Common Core State Standards Initiative) «preparing all students for success in college, career, and life.»
Even the 1994
federal Title I reforms, which required states to develop the three major prongs of an effective
accountability system (academic standards, tests linked to the standards, and a mixture of assistance and sanctions for low - performing schools)
did little to stimulate California into action.
While liberals got some «guardrails» around state
accountability systems, they failed to get a
federal mandate on equalizing school funding — though Obama education secretary John King is now
doing his utmost to devise one via executive branch regulations.
The problem stems from parents» concern that their own children might be denied promotion or graduation based on a test score; from voters» confusion when their own upscale suburban schools are deemed to be failing by state or
federal accountability systems even though most of the graduates
do just fine; and from frustration when parents — often prompted by teachers — conclude that the basic - skills testing regime yields too much «drill and kill,» too little flexibility, and insufficient attention to art, music, and other creative disciplines.
The last time the
federal government left
accountability completely to the states, two - thirds decided to
do nothing; only two states included the performance of individual groups of students in their
systems.
States could have eviscerated their
accountability systems,
doing the bare minimum under the
federal law by identifying their very worst schools, and staying mum about the other 90 or 95 percent.
Ritz has said she doesn't want to run afoul of any rules that would put Indiana's
federal education funding in jeopardy, but that hasn't stopped her from criticizing the state's
accountability system.
Teachers can still close the classroom door, but after more than a decade of
federal and state
accountability systems, teachers feel they have less independence in what they
do inside,
federal data show.
The new proposed
federal school
accountability system is looking to
do the same.
New Labels to Indicate School Performance: A to F. All waiver states had to identify low - performing schools as «priority» or «focus» schools for
federal accountability purposes, but these
federal distinctions didn't have to translate to state school ratings
systems.