Not exact matches
Granting the CFTC's request for a preliminary injunction against the defendants who allegedly engaged in deception
and fraud involving virtual currency spot markets, Judge Weinstein noted that» [u] ntil Congress clarifies the matter,» the CFTC has «concurrent authority» along with other
state and federal administrative agencies
and civil
and criminal
courts over transactions in virtual currency.
«Until Congress clarifies the matter, the CFTC has concurrent authority, along with other
state and federal administrative agencies,
and civil
and criminal
courts,
over dealings in virtual currency,» Weinstein wrote.
«
Over 240» class action lawsuits by consumers against Equifax in US
federal and state courts and in Canadian
courts.
Judge Andreas Korbmacher said on Thursday the country's highest
federal administrative
court would rule on Feb. 27 on an appeal brought by German
states against bans imposed by local
courts in Stuttgart
and Duesseldorf
over poor air quality.
Trump is no stranger to trying to use the legal system to get his way: USA Today found during the 2016 campaign that Trump
and his businesses had been involved in at least 3,500 legal actions in
state and federal courts over the course of three decades.
On March 6, 2018, Judge Jack B. Weinstein of the U.S. District
Court for the Eastern District of New York ruled that virtual currencies are commodities under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA)
and therefore subject to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) anti-fraud
and anti-manipulation enforcement authority.1 Granting the CFTC's request for a preliminary injunction against the defendants who allegedly engaged in deception
and fraud involving virtual currency spot markets, Judge Weinstein noted that «[u] ntil Congress clarifies the matter,» the CFTC has «concurrent authority» along with other
state and federal administrative agencies
and civil
and criminal
courts over transactions in virtual currency.2
It's a little too late for praying, it's Mrs.Clinton's call to be @ the helm; now, with her hubby Mr.Clinton as VP;
and one of you out of all of you, need to tell Romney he's committed fraud, for leaving the Post of so - called gov.that theirs a 2 yr.interval that must be met; the same fo Obama; whom is worst off then Bush Jr.then for none of you to have no Allegiance to be nothing but commander of thieves, since April 4th, 1968 to presently; in the killing of Dr.King Jr.must still go under Oath to all you perjurers; that mustn't go unpunished to the array of charges I have stored up against each of yo on every job, on every public premise; that Obama didn't praywhen he lied to GOD ALMIGHTY in perjury; to have left the seat of sen.to jump to the office; knowing he hadn't a clue what to do; so he got Joe, which is Cheney all
over; whom should of been out of public;
and he knows that
and all the fugitives, even in the Italian led
court in DC; that will have to answer to what is -LCB- H.R. 7152 -RCB-;
and why they let Olsen for Bush Jr.waste the American's People's time, not to mention all the lives that's been lost; for the tyrannies since 1968 to presently has cost; Vote I, Edward Baltimore; to confirm I; Governor of DC; as of 2/16/12; cause DC; has been a
State, already;
and all you slaves from
State to
State; need to snap out of your peonage which is prohibited by
Federal Laws; on anybody!!!!!!!
The
federal and state courts of the State of New York shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all claims Miscellaneous Termina
state courts of the
State of New York shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all claims Miscellaneous Termina
State of New York shall have exclusive jurisdiction
over all claims Miscellaneous Termination.
The
federal and state courts of the State of New York shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all c
state courts of the
State of New York shall have exclusive jurisdiction over all c
State of New York shall have exclusive jurisdiction
over all claims
It's ABSURD to suggest that ANY U.S.
court (at the
federal or
state level) is going to suddenly ignore
over 200 years of American legal precedent
and decide a case based on Islamic law.
On top of that, the Seneca Nation filed a complaint
over the cigarette tax in
federal court and claimed it was giving the
state government until Thursday to respond to their demand to postpone its enforcement.
Lawmakers remain at odds
over unifying the
state's primary dates for
federal elections — held in June by
court order —
and state and local party primaries, held in September.
Nader's lawsuit against the
Federal Election Commission,
over the FEC's refusal to even ask various
state Democratic Parties
and various law firms to respond to his complaint will be argued on January 14, 2013, in the U.S.
Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit.
A former senior official appointed by Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo who resigned recently has been accused by a former
state employee of sexual harassment
and assault, according to a lawsuit filed in
Federal District
Court in Manhattan
over the weekend.
The Economic
and Financial Crimes Commission on Monday re-arraigned a former governor of Adamawa
State, Murtala Nyako, his son, Senator Abdulaziz Nyako, along with others before a
Federal High
Court in Abuja
over alleged N40bn fraud.
Former Governor of Enugu
State, Barr Sullivan Chime, on Monday appeared before a
Federal High
Court through his lawyer
over a suit bordering on the probe of his eight - year tenure by the Economic
and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC.
A
federal judge hammered an attorney for California
over the
state's push for a
court order immediately reinstating «Obamacare» subsidies cut off by the Trump administration, saying California
and other
states had protected consumers from the loss of the funding.
At the ongoing trial of a former Governor of Zamfara
State and serving Senator of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, Ahmed Sani Yerima, over alleged diversion of state funds, the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has made its final submission before Justice Bello Tukur Gummi of Zamfara State High Court 5, sitting in G
State and serving Senator of the
Federal Republic of Nigeria, Ahmed Sani Yerima,
over alleged diversion of
state funds, the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has made its final submission before Justice Bello Tukur Gummi of Zamfara State High Court 5, sitting in G
state funds, the Independent Corrupt Practices
and Other Related Offences Commission (ICPC) has made its final submission before Justice Bello Tukur Gummi of Zamfara
State High Court 5, sitting in G
State High
Court 5, sitting in Gusau.
It read, «The
Court of Appeal Benin City sat in judgment, 5th July 2017,
over a pending appeal challenging the ruling of
Federal High
Court, Warri which vacated the APC Delta
State Exco led by Prophet Jones Ode Erue,
and also authorised a repeat Congress.
Howe's attorneys — Kevin Hulslander, of Syracuse,
and Richard Morvillo, of New York City — said the lawsuit belongs in
federal court because it involves parties from different
states and involves a sum of money
over $ 75,000.
Justice Inyang Ekwo, who presided
over the case at the
Federal High
Court in Lokoja, Kogi
State, found him guilty of 77 counts
and sentenced him to 2 years imprisonment on each count, to run concurrently.
Justice Joyce Abdulmaleek of the
Federal High
Court, Ibadan, on Thursday remanded a former Minister of
State for
Federal Capital Territory, Olajumoke Akinjide;
and Olanrewaju Otiti in the custody of the Economic
and Financial Crimes Commission,
over alleged N650m fraud.
The term «water law» in the Colorado River basin has come to refer to a monstrous volume of
federal statutes
and agreements,
court precedents
and state laws
and regulations that can differ from place to place
and have changed incrementally
over the years but are structured by the interstate agreements to divide the river.
[Box 26] AAAS
and Congress, lobbying, 1959 - 1987 Congress, 1986 Arctic, 1981 Legislative Branch, 1981 - 1984 Executive Branch, pre-1985 OMB Circular, 1983 Science Policy: A Working Glossary, 1978 Science Policy Task Force Congressional Research Service, 1986 Environmental Protection Agency House Committee on Science
and Technology, 1986 Office of Management
and Budget Office of Science
and Technology Policy, 1982 Office of Technology Assessment, 1980 Senate
State Department (2 Folders) AAAS Science, Engineering,
and Diplomacy Fellows, Lunch
and Orientation, 1983 Tax Bills, 1981 Edwards vs Aguilard, Louisiana Creationist Suit, 1986 Edwards vs Aguilard, NAS amicus brief Edwards vs Aguilard, People for the American Way amicus brief Edwards vs Aguilard, Supreme
Court arguments Hutchinson vs. Proxmire, amicus brief, 1978 Southeastern College vs. Frances Davis, amicus brief, 1979
State Department, 1976 - 1984 Human Subjects Research, 1979 Controversy
over Inhaber Article in Science, 1979 Three Mile Island, 1979
Federal appropriations, universities
and pork barrel projects
You agree that jurisdiction
over and venue in any legal proceeding directly or indirectly arising out of or relating to this site (including but not limited to the purchase of Integrative Health Care, P.C. products) shall be in the
state or
federal courts located in Maricopa County, Arizona.
You agree that jurisdiction
over and venue in any legal proceeding directly or indirectly arising out of or relating to this site (including but not limited to the purchase of Activation Products products) shall be in the
state or
federal courts located in Los Angeles County, California.
While an audience watched Edgerton
and Ruth Negga's portrayal of Richard
and Mildred Loving, the biracial couple whose landmark civil rights case saw the U.S. Supreme
Court end all racial restrictions on marriage in 1967, a legal fight is being waged between the U.S.
federal government
and the
state of North Carolina
over equal rights for transgender Americans,
and gay marriage continues to be a divisive issue.
The initial ruling — which still must be reviewed by the Secretary of Education
and could eventually be contested in
court — addresses a longstanding dispute between
federal and state education officials
over the interpretation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
The U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled late last month that due to extensive
state control
over school finances, California school districts are
state agencies
and deserve the same 11th Amendment immunity against
federal lawsuits enjoyed by other branches of
state government.
The fallout from the 2009 legislative session continues in
state court, as Gov. Sanford
and lawmakers battle
over whether South Carolina will accept $ 700 million in
federal stimulus money that would help pay teachers» salaries
and fund public safety.
In March of 1995, a
federal appeals
court judge, citing the school board's mismanagement
and fiscal irresponsibility, turned control of the city's schools
over to the
state.
As many of you know by now, Jones, a former U.S. Attorney
and scion of a political family that includes famed judge
and U.S. Senator Howell Heflin, won what was previously considered an unlikely victory
over Moore, a jurist who was twice removed from his role as chief justice of the Iron
State's supreme
court for willfully ignoring failing to enforce
federal rulings.
«The frustration of the
court matches the policy movements across the
states and across the
federal government
over the same time,» said Eric A. Hanushek, a fellow in education at the Hoover Institute at Stanford University, who testified for the
State of Connecticut in defending what it spends on schools.
A few examples of responsibilities include middle
and high school reform, smaller learning communities, continuation high schools,
court and community schools, independent study, Partnership Academies, Regional Occupational Centers
and Programs, gender equity compliance, business
and industry partnerships,
and oversight of
state and federal programs totaling
over $ 1 billion in annual revenues.
Recall from prior posts (here, here,
and here) that seven teachers in the Houston Independent School District (HISD), with the support of the Houston Federation of Teachers (HFT), are taking HISD to
federal court over how their value - added scores, derived via the Education Value - Added Assessment System (EVAAS), are being used,
and allegedly abused, while this district that has tied more high - stakes consequences to value - added output than any other district /
state in the nation.
You agree that any action at law or in equity arising out of or relating to these terms
and conditions shall be filed only in,
and resolved in, the
federal or
state courts in the State of Illinois, and you hereby irrevocably and unconditionally consent and submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts over any suit, action or proceeding arising out of this No
state courts in the
State of Illinois, and you hereby irrevocably and unconditionally consent and submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts over any suit, action or proceeding arising out of this No
State of Illinois,
and you hereby irrevocably
and unconditionally consent
and submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of such
courts over any suit, action or proceeding arising out of this Notice.
Notwithstanding any provision of this arbitration provision or the rules
and procedures of the arbitration administrator, the Bank will be responsible for payment
and / or reimbursement of any arbitration fees to the extent that such fees exceed the amount of the filing fees you would have incurred if your Claim had been brought in the
state or
federal court nearest your residence with jurisdiction
over the Claims.
Over the course of 22 years, the Denver ban has withstood numerous battles in
state and federal courts.
Over time, he hopes to expand into other
states and the
federal courts.
Answer: Yes, at least 90 personal injury lawsuits are already pending in
federal and state court against Skechers USA Inc. (The National Law Journal, Suits pile up
over toning shoes)
To date, Tom has been lead counsel in
over 100 jury trials in both
Federal and State Court encompassing a wide variety of injuries
and wrongful death resulting from product liability, premises liability, vehicular, trucking accidents,
and bad faith litigation.
Rather, Marshall Dennehey has
over 500 lawyers who litigate in the
state and federal courts and self - regulatory entities
and administrative agencies.
Act as Discovery Neutrals, ESI Liaisons,
and Special Masters in disputes in
federal and state courts all
over the US, leveraging our experience
and technical expertise.
Clients benefit from his record of
over 75 oral arguments before the US Supreme
Court, alongside multiple appearances in
state courts and wider
federal circuits.
The litigation team has
over 35 years defending the railroad in all metropolitan New York venues,
state and federal courts.
Sean has also participated in
federal and state court discovery
and pretrial hearings in
over 25
states.
The latest procedural dispute between Apple
and Google (Motorola) is
over which U.S. appeals
court — the Federal Circuit or the Seventh Circuit — should hear the parties» cross-appeal of a FRAND contract ruling handed down in November 2012 by the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisco
court — the
Federal Circuit or the Seventh Circuit — should hear the parties» cross-appeal of a FRAND contract ruling handed down in November 2012 by the United
States District
Court for the Western District of Wisco
Court for the Western District of Wisconsin.
Lawyers at RRD have represented police, emergency services personnel, municipalities, town agencies
and schools in
over one - hundred lawsuits in the
state and federal courts.
Mr. Cooper's experience includes
over three decades of extensive trial practice in
state and federal courts, before administrative agencies
and licensing boards
and in arbitration in the areas of complex civil disputes
and criminal defense.
A seasoned regulatory, trial
and appellate attorney, Mr. Ivey has handled
over 45 jury trials in
federal and state courts.