Suffice to say they're all heavy hitters, with high numbers of Supreme Court and
federal appellate court cases under their belts.
Not exact matches
The firm has a wide - ranging litigation practice at both the trial and
appellate levels of the
federal and New Jersey state
court systems, having successfully litigated cases up through and including the United States Supreme C
court systems, having successfully litigated
cases up through and including the United States Supreme
CourtCourt.
But
federal prosecutors brought new charges against the 83 - year - old ex-senator, and a
federal appellate court ruled prosecutors can move forward with a quid pro quo
case against him.
The
Court's 5 - to - 4 decision in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico affirms an appellate - court decision returning the closely watched censorship case to federal district court for t
Court's 5 - to - 4 decision in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. Pico affirms an
appellate -
court decision returning the closely watched censorship case to federal district court for t
court decision returning the closely watched censorship
case to
federal district
court for t
court for trial.
Washington — Parents who win special - education disputes with school districts can not be awarded attorneys» fees if their
cases do not go to
court, a
federal appellate court has ruled.
A reissued decision in the Topeka, Kan., school - desegregation suit gives a more detailed picture of a
federal appellate panel's deep division over the need for continued
court supervision in the historic
case.
To discern the larger contours of the legal climate facing schools, we analyzed all
appellate - level
federal and state
court cases in which school efforts to discipline and control students have been challenged.
It is thus significant that the number of
cases reaching state and
federal appellate courts has surged back up to levels attained during the early 1970s when civil rights
cases had a central place on the national political agenda (see Figure 1).
The game makers are wrong to argue that the
Federal Circuit should rehear the
case because the
appellate court panel allegedly created a «safe harbor» for technological ideas, as the court simply followed precedent for abstract claims as set by Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that abstract ideas implemented using a computer are not eligible for a patent, asserted McRO Inc. in its b
court panel allegedly created a «safe harbor» for technological ideas, as the
court simply followed precedent for abstract claims as set by Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that abstract ideas implemented using a computer are not eligible for a patent, asserted McRO Inc. in its b
court simply followed precedent for abstract claims as set by Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, a 2014 U.S. Supreme
Court decision that held that abstract ideas implemented using a computer are not eligible for a patent, asserted McRO Inc. in its b
Court decision that held that abstract ideas implemented using a computer are not eligible for a patent, asserted McRO Inc. in its brief.
News.lawreader.com has summaries of Kentucky
cases,
federal appellate decisions, U.S. Supreme
Court decisions, and professional ethics
cases.
«
Appellate Daily has the latest news headlines from all thirteen
federal appellate courts, along with judge spotlights,
case analysis, and related commentary.»
Even though the site is focused on New York, its users can research
cases from any
federal court or state
appellate court and statutes from every state.
Rather, it merely proves that the different regional
federal appellate courts follow somewhat different rules governing the order in which the judges on the three - judge panel that decided the
case are listed on an opinion.
We regularly handle matters in
federal and state appellate courts throughout the United States, and have represented clients in more than 30 patent and other cases in the Federal Circuit in the last two
federal and state
appellate courts throughout the United States, and have represented clients in more than 30 patent and other
cases in the
Federal Circuit in the last two
Federal Circuit in the last two years.
Mr. Stellabotte is a registered patent attorney and has extensive experience litigating patent, copyright, trade secret, antitrust, contract, tort, trademark, false advertising, and information technology related matters in
federal and state trial and
appellate courts, including
case preparation and strategy, fact and expert discovery, depositions, motion practice, Markman hearings, preliminary injunction hearings, bench and jury trials, arbitrations, mediations, appeals, and settlement negotiations.
Long and Christensen found no statistically significant correlation between readability and outcome in the briefs in their study.129 For
federal appellate court briefs and state supreme
court briefs, the only variable with a statistically significant correlation to reversal was jurisdiction, which is not surprising because state
cases have higher reversal rates than
federal cases.
First, readability scores for
federal appellate court opinions and state supreme court opinions were similar.131 Second, readability scores from U.S. Supreme Court opinions were lower than opinions from the other courts.132 Third, briefs from U.S. Supreme Court cases had lower readability scores than briefs from the other courts.133 Finally, at the U.S. Supreme Court level, the opinion readability scores were significantly lower than the brief readability score
court opinions and state supreme
court opinions were similar.131 Second, readability scores from U.S. Supreme Court opinions were lower than opinions from the other courts.132 Third, briefs from U.S. Supreme Court cases had lower readability scores than briefs from the other courts.133 Finally, at the U.S. Supreme Court level, the opinion readability scores were significantly lower than the brief readability score
court opinions were similar.131 Second, readability scores from U.S. Supreme
Court opinions were lower than opinions from the other courts.132 Third, briefs from U.S. Supreme Court cases had lower readability scores than briefs from the other courts.133 Finally, at the U.S. Supreme Court level, the opinion readability scores were significantly lower than the brief readability score
Court opinions were lower than opinions from the other
courts.132 Third, briefs from U.S. Supreme
Court cases had lower readability scores than briefs from the other courts.133 Finally, at the U.S. Supreme Court level, the opinion readability scores were significantly lower than the brief readability score
Court cases had lower readability scores than briefs from the other
courts.133 Finally, at the U.S. Supreme
Court level, the opinion readability scores were significantly lower than the brief readability score
Court level, the opinion readability scores were significantly lower than the brief readability scores.134
He routinely tries workers» compensation
cases before the Illinois Workers Compensation Commission, handles appeals to the circuit
courts and
appellate courts, and appears in both state and
federal courts throughout Illinois in related civil litigation.
The Handbook contains an overview of the types of litigation found in the
federal court system, the
courts» governance and administration, the workings of chambers, and
case management at both the trial and
appellate levels.
Sandy has experience and handles
cases at both the trial and
appellate level in state and
federal court.
Joel served as lead counsel in many landmark
cases in both trial and
appellate courts, including the U.S. Supreme
Court, and participated in shaping several important pieces of
federal legislation enforced by the FDA.
The weekly posts here offer an insider's perspective on oral arguments in major
cases at the
federal appellate level and news stories about sitting Supreme
Court justices.
Currently, Google Scholar allows you to search and read published opinions of US state
appellate and supreme
court cases since 1950, US
federal district,
appellate, tax and bankruptcy
courts since...
A
federal appellate judge warned Friday that patent reform bills circulating on Capitol Hill threaten to erode the power of the
courts to decide how
cases are heard.
A large number of
federal appellate courts state on the face of their precedential opinions that the date on which the opinion issued is the date on which the
case was decided.
He has handled a wide range of matters in state and
federal trial and
appellate courts, including white collar criminal defense, business disputes, and commercial real estate
cases.
He worked on the
appellate briefing in the seminal Potvin
case with Henry Fenton and has extensive
appellate experience, having worked on many appeals before the California and
federal courts.
She has been trial counsel for multiple matters tried to a favorable jury verdict, as well as
appellate counsel for
cases in which she has both written the
appellate briefs and argued the appeals in state and
federal courts.
His representation has ranged from class action and complex commercial and environmental
cases to limited jurisdiction premises liability
cases and administrative hearings, successfully arguing
appellate cases such as Resolution Trust Corp. v. Rossmoor Corp. (1995) 34 Cal.App.4 th 93, Ryan v. Lustre - Cal (2014) WL 7384613, McCormick v. San Pedro Bait Co., Inc. (2009) WL 4801962 and the
federal district
court decision, Ameripride Services, Inc. v. Valley Industrial Service, Inc. (2007 E.D. Cal.)
A
federal appellate nominee and a former Texas Supreme
Court justice are representing opposing sides in a battle over an oral agreement to pay legal fees in a
case involving...
«As first noted here late last night, in today's edition of The Recorder of San Francisco, attorney Cyrus Sanai has an interesting essay entitled «Taking the Kozinski Challenge» that begins, «The fiercest battle within the
federal appellate courts these days is not over abortion or gay marriage, but the arcane question of whether an attorney may cite the unpublished
case law of an
appellate court as the binding law of the circuit.»»
We do the
case summaries themselves, so we write
case summaries for all the
federal appellate courts, Supreme
Court, all the circuits.
We have taken
cases to
federal and state
appellate courts, the Kentucky Supreme
Court, and the Supreme
Court of the United States.
He has handled a wide variety of multi-party
cases involving multi-million dollar exposure at the trial and
appellate levels and is one of the leading environmental litigators in the country, handling
cases in both
federal and state
courts.
Combined they have tried hundreds of
cases serving as litigation and
appellate counsel in
federal district
courts, before the International Trade Commission, (ITC) and before various U.S. Courts of A
courts, before the International Trade Commission, (ITC) and before various U.S.
Courts of A
Courts of Appeal.
In addition to the Knowles
case, he has successfully argued class action related appeals in three
federal circuits and in state
appellate courts, and he has successfully defeated class certification in many state and
federal trial
courts.
In theory, successful
appellate lawyers make their money on
cases in the lower
federal courts, from their own clients and from internal referrals within their firms.
PACER — Public Access to
Court Electronic Records — is the system operated by the Administrative Office of the U.S.
Courts to provide online access to case and docket information from the federal appellate, district and bankruptcy c
Courts to provide online access to
case and docket information from the
federal appellate, district and bankruptcy
courtscourts.
For one thing, Scholar has a fairly significant cache of articles and
case law that runs back about 60 years and encompasses
federal district
court cases, state and
federal appellate decisions, and other topics generally reserved for the legal community.
I did start my own firm after all, which lead to me becoming an offshore renewables legal expert and arguing
cases before
federal appellate courts and juries...» More here.
He has represented clients in state,
federal,
appellate, and Supreme
Court cases.
Roy is an experienced trial lawyer and has tried
cases throughout Texas state and
federal courts,
courts of neighboring states, and has served as
appellate counsel in the Texas Supreme
Court and the United States
Court of Appeal for the Fifth Circuit.
We have also tried and argued
cases in the
courts of common pleas,
federal court, Pennsylvania
appellate courts, and
federal appellate courts.
A relatively recent
case in the
federal appellate court that has jurisdiction over Florida
federal courts held that claims based on sexual orientation are not covered by the
federal law governing employment discrimination.
Through the course of his clerkship with Montana's chief
federal judge, Jeff also worked on
appellate cases for the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals and
cases for the United States District
Court of Guam.
Each state section includes the
federal and state
case law for that state — state
appellate courts,
federal circuit
court, U.S. District Court and U.S. Supreme C
court, U.S. District
Court and U.S. Supreme C
Court and U.S. Supreme
CourtCourt.
Casetext has just started adding citator treatment for
federal appellate cases and will eventually add state supreme and
appellate court cases.
Doug Smith has litigated
cases at both the trial and
appellate stage in state and
federal courts throughout the country, including commercial, mass tort, product liability, securities, bankruptcy, environmental, and intellectual property
cases.
Handling
cases in state,
federal and
appellate courts nationwide, including the United States Supreme
Court
He has briefed and argued major
cases to state and
federal appellate courts in Texas including the Texas Supreme
Court.