Sentences with phrase «federal appellate matters»

Not exact matches

Mr. Siegal's other client successes include securing a 2016 trial victory in federal court defending Marvel Entertainment against a claim that it stole a patent - holder's design for a Spiderman role play web - shooting toy, and numerous federal and state appellate arguments in criminal and civil matters.

We regularly handle matters in federal and state appellate courts throughout the United States, and have represented clients in more than 30 patent and other cases in the Federal Circuit in the last twofederal and state appellate courts throughout the United States, and have represented clients in more than 30 patent and other cases in the Federal Circuit in the last twoFederal Circuit in the last two years.

Mr. Stellabotte is a registered patent attorney and has extensive experience litigating patent, copyright, trade secret, antitrust, contract, tort, trademark, false advertising, and information technology related matters in federal and state trial and appellate courts, including case preparation and strategy, fact and expert discovery, depositions, motion practice, Markman hearings, preliminary injunction hearings, bench and jury trials, arbitrations, mediations, appeals, and settlement negotiations.

Firm partner Bradley C. Nahrstadt concentrates on the defense of Chicago product liability claims in both state and federal courts, as well as handling matters at the appellate level.

Mr. Ross» extensive business litigation expertise includes matters involving unfair business practices and related business torts, real estate disputes, partnership disputes, construction litigation, common carrier disputes and commercial litigation in state and federal trial and appellate courts, as well as in alternative dispute resolution tribunals.

Representative matters include civil jury trials and bench trials in both state and federal court; complex civil litigation involving the energy industry, including defense of class actions; condemnations and surface damage disputes; and appellate work.

Mr. Cacace has represented clients in a wide range of matters in state and federal trial and appellate courts, including business litigation, intellectual property disputes, product liability actions, consumer class actions, and real estate disputes.

Joseph handles matters at the trial and appellate levels in both state and federal courts.

They have extensive trial and appellate experience in the federal and state courts throughout the United States and internationally, as well as in arbitration and mediation matters.

He has handled a wide range of matters in state and federal trial and appellate courts, including white collar criminal defense, business disputes, and commercial real estate cases.

Chris provides business and corporate advice, including advice related to sales and acquisitions, commercial leasing, contracts, real estate conveyance and financing; broad commercial litigation representation including contracts and other business disputes, commercial and residential construction defect claims, religious entity law, advice regarding employment disputes and compliance, including ADA, ADEA, Title VII, Colorado Wage Act, FLSA compliance, and administrative proceedings before EEOC and DORA - Colorado Civil Rights Division; representation in administrative proceedings, C.R.C.P. 106 (a)(4) appeals and interlocutory appeals regarding governmental immunity, defense and pursuit of 42 USC § 1983 actions in federal and state court; representation of public pension funds in litigation and administrative matters; and appellate practice before the Colorado Court of Appeals, Colorado Supreme Court, and the 10th Circuit.

She has been trial counsel for multiple matters tried to a favorable jury verdict, as well as appellate counsel for cases in which she has both written the appellate briefs and argued the appeals in state and federal courts.

Alongside her litigation practice, Shelley handles appellate matters, and has extensive experience in appellate motion practice and briefing before both state and federal courts.

Michael S. Lieberman is a founding partner whose many years of practice include the successful litigation of numerous complex civil and criminal matters with a particular emphasis in the federal and state appellate court system.

Lauren represents public and private companies and individuals in a broad range of matters, including business, real estate, property development, construction and employment litigation in state and federal trial and appellate courts.

He frequently litigates business disputes and issues relating to supply network and distribution matters, as well as disputes involving contracts, business torts, trade secrets, trade dress, covenants not to compete, and enforcement of intellectual property rights before state and federal trial and appellate courts, including arbitration panels.

Haverstick's litigation practice focuses primarily on representing government officials and entities in the Supreme and Commonwealth Courts of Pennsylvania, as well as other state and federal appellate courts, in matters ranging from public corruption investigations to the Right - to - Know Law to the constitutionality of state laws.

We litigate high - stakes copyright and trademark matters in federal courts nationwide, at both the trial and appellate levels, in arbitrations, and before the United States Patent and Trademark Office's Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.

Firm principal Jeffrey Allen has 40 years of experience in transactional and litigation matters in trial and appellate courts at both the state and federal level.

He represents his clients at the state and federal levels as well as in appellate and arbitration matters, including the American Arbitration Association, JAMMS, and the London Court of International Arbitration.

Alan Schoenfeld has experience representing clients in a wide variety of civil matters before state and federal courts, at both the trial and appellate levels.

Our attorneys provide support and guidance to individuals and businesses in resolving complex legal matters, and draw upon extensive trial and appellate experience in state, federal and military courts.

Prior to joining Quinn Emanuel in 2011, Matt worked as a lawyer on appellate, civil and commercial litigation, and legal advisory matters with the South Australian Crown Solicitor and Solicitor General in the High Court of Australia, Federal Court of Australia, and local courts in South Australia.

Prior to joining Brown Law Group, Mr. Cocanig worked as an attorney at Winston & Strawn in Chicago, IL where he represented clients in litigation and appellate proceedings in state and federal courts in banking, real estate, and general litigation matters.

Karen has first - and second - chaired matters in numerous state and federal trial and appellate courts throughout the country and in arbitration and mediation, and has experience in all phases of litigation from pre-litigation strategy and counseling to settlement negotiation and appeals.

Like The Conduct of an Appeal, this blog addresses the jurisdiction and powers of appellate courts in civil and criminal matters in Canada, together with significant procedural developments in appellate courts, including the Federal Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of Canada.

taken hundreds of matters to trial over the past decade, including more than 45 oral arguments in state and federal appellate courts in 2015 alone;

John B. Kopf, III, a member of the Business Litigation practice group in Columbus, represents clients in civil and construction matters in state and federal trial courts, state and federal appellate courts, bankruptcy courts, mediations and arbitrations.

On the appellate side, he has prepared merits briefs, petitions for certiorari and amicus briefs before the US Supreme Court and numerous federal appellate courts in cases involving arbitration, banking, constitutional, commercial, insurance, intellectual property and securities matters.

Prior to joining JMBM, Matthew worked for five years as an appellate attorney in the Environment & Natural Resources Division at the U.S. Department of Justice, where he represented federal agencies in the federal courts of appeals; for four years as an attorney at Paul Hastings, where he advised and represented corporate clients in environmental and real estate matters; for two years as a law clerk to the Honorable Consuelo M. Callahan on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; and for two years as a supervising attorney and lecturer at the Stanford Law School Environmental Law Clinic, where he taught students the practice of law and represented grass - roots and national organizations in environmental litigation and policy matters.

And there is no question that judges — especially those on the Supreme Court and the various federal appellate judges — matter in the development of law in the United States.

Laura K. Gasiorowski, Esq., who has been practicing criminal defense law since 1994, joined the Stahl Criminal Defense Lawyers in 2005, and has concentrated her career on complex pre-trial, trial and appellate matters in a wide variety of state and federal criminal matters, including mail fraud, money laundering, gambling, narcotics violations, murder, and RICO.

She has handled settlement negotiations, arbitrations, and all phases of litigation in federal and state courts across the country, from pre-filing advising and discovery through trial and appellate matters.

Previously, the report concluded that two key authors — Jay Bybee, now a federal appellate court judge, and John Yoo, now a law professor — violated their professional obligations as lawyers when they crafted a crucial 2002 memo approving the use of harsh tactics, say two Justice sources who asked for anonymity discussing an internal matter.

He has represented clients in state and federal courts in trial and appellate matters.

He also represents clients in matters before the U.S. Supreme Court and various federal and state appellate courts.

In the United States, this includes experience in natural gas compliance and enforcement matters (including Federal Energy Regulatory (FERC), Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and state agencies) and administrative and appellate litigation relating to rates, terms, and conditions of service.

Owen Bird's maritime lawyers have particular experience in matters relating to cargo coverage and damage, collisions, stevedoring, insurance (both defence and subrogated claims), regulatory matters, and other maritime claims, both in federal and provincial courts and at trial and appellate levels.

The Bartlett Jones Law Firm is committed to providing the highest quality of professionalism and legal representation to its clients.This commitment extends to our appellate practice in the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the Louisiana Supreme Court, and all Louisiana intermediate appellate courts, as well as to representation in litigation matters in all Louisiana state and federal district courts.

We have represented clients in a wide range of patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret enforcement and infringement matters, including litigation in state and federal courts, and appellate proceedings in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Representation of plaintiffs and defendants in federal district and regional appellate courts in numerous patent infringement and preliminary injunction matters.

Recent matters include federal appellate court victories on behalf of a major investment firm in a case involving federal preemption, on behalf of government entities in a case involving foreign sovereign immunity, and on behalf of a leading defense contractor in a case involving aviation - related issues.

A federal appellate court has considered whether an arbitration award should be vacated because an arbitrator failed to disclose that he had served as co-counsel in a lengthy litigation matter with one of the attorneys who was now representing one of the parties in the arbitration.