Not exact matches
«But there is going to need to be some major lawsuits or decisions by
federal courts,
appellate courts or more to decide what are acceptable
practices online for a real shift to take place.
The firm has a wide - ranging litigation
practice at both the trial and
appellate levels of the
federal and New Jersey state court systems, having successfully litigated cases up through and including the United States Supreme Court.
A top ranked attorney, Mr. Lally is an experienced practioner with an extensive background in commercial and corporate transactions,
federal and state litigation, administrative proceedings, and
appellate practice.
Before entering the charter school world, Renita was a public defender in New York City,
practicing at the trial and
appellate levels in state and
federal courts.
With over one hundred trials and fifteen arguments in the
federal appellate courts, I have appeared before a lot of judges and seen good and bad
practices from the bench and believe that I have learned from them.
Alan Untereiner operates a broad
appellate practice, which has featured a number of appearances in the Supreme Court and wider state and
federal courts.
Tulsa's James Potts & Wulfers employment lawyer professionals are part of a diversified law
practice of services for sole proprietors and business entity clients seeking representation in Oklahoma's state district and
appellate courts and
federal district and
appellate courts.
Prior to joining MG+M, Rebecca was a partner in the Miami office of another national law firm, serving on the national trial team for one of its largest clients and leading the firm's asbestos
practice in state,
federal and
appellate courts throughout Florida.
Mr. Robbins specializes in handling complex civil and criminal litigation in state and
federal courts throughout the country and has extensive experience in trial and
appellate practice, alternative dispute resolution, expert witness development and litigation management.
What the team is known for Esteemed
appellate group with a wealth of experience
practicing before the US Supreme Court, state
appellate courts and wider
federal courts of appeals.
«Anne's impressive expertise as a
federal prosecutor and her work before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will add significant strength to King & Spalding's
appellate bench and to the firm's West Coast litigation
practice,» said Tim Scott, managing partner of King & Spalding's Silicon Valley office.
Mr. Stellabotte is a registered patent attorney and has extensive experience litigating patent, copyright, trade secret, antitrust, contract, tort, trademark, false advertising, and information technology related matters in
federal and state trial and
appellate courts, including case preparation and strategy, fact and expert discovery, depositions, motion
practice, Markman hearings, preliminary injunction hearings, bench and jury trials, arbitrations, mediations, appeals, and settlement negotiations.
Richard is licensed to
practice in New Jersey and New York, in addition to various
federal trial and
appellate courts, including the Supreme Court of the United States.
In reality, as the majority of legal representatives know,
appellate practice typically is based in
federal and state courts of appeal and typically has little to do with Supreme Court
practice.
What the team is known for Highly regarded and accomplished
appellate practice, with an extensive record of Supreme Court appearances alongside deep
federal and state appeals experience.
Mr. Ross» extensive business litigation expertise includes matters involving unfair business
practices and related business torts, real estate disputes, partnership disputes, construction litigation, common carrier disputes and commercial litigation in state and
federal trial and
appellate courts, as well as in alternative dispute resolution tribunals.
What the team is known for High - caliber
practice group with an excellent track record in high - stakes and high - value corporate disputes, drawing from a strong team of
appellate attorneys with extensive experience in the Supreme Court and wider
federal courts of appeal.
The attorneys in our construction law
practice are skilled litigators with years of experience defending first party and third party construction law claims in both the state and
federal trial and
appellate court systems.
Scarinci Hollenbeck employment litigation
practice is comprised of New Jersey's top litigation attorneys with extensive state and
federal trial and
appellate experience in employment litigation.
His
practice spans a wide range of litigation in
federal and state courts at the trial and
appellate levels and before arbitral tribunals.
I almost landed in another
federal agency's
appellate office that
practiced a very narrow issue before
federal circuits across the country, but chose my current job because of the very broad swath of constitutional criminal issues we routinely litigate, which is endlessly fascinating.
Chris provides business and corporate advice, including advice related to sales and acquisitions, commercial leasing, contracts, real estate conveyance and financing; broad commercial litigation representation including contracts and other business disputes, commercial and residential construction defect claims, religious entity law, advice regarding employment disputes and compliance, including ADA, ADEA, Title VII, Colorado Wage Act, FLSA compliance, and administrative proceedings before EEOC and DORA - Colorado Civil Rights Division; representation in administrative proceedings, C.R.C.P. 106 (a)(4) appeals and interlocutory appeals regarding governmental immunity, defense and pursuit of 42 USC § 1983 actions in
federal and state court; representation of public pension funds in litigation and administrative matters; and
appellate practice before the Colorado Court of Appeals, Colorado Supreme Court, and the 10th Circuit.
Alongside her litigation
practice, Shelley handles
appellate matters, and has extensive experience in
appellate motion
practice and briefing before both state and
federal courts.
Michael S. Lieberman is a founding partner whose many years of
practice include the successful litigation of numerous complex civil and criminal matters with a particular emphasis in the
federal and state
appellate court system.
Prior to building her
appellate firm, Wendy was an associate in the Global Litigation & White Collar Defense
practice groups of an international law firm, where she was the primary associate dedicated to two
federal criminal trials.
Though he is admitted to the
federal bar, he focuses his
appellate practice in the state courts.
Before joining Therium, Mr. Dempsey was a litigator in the New York office of Hogan Lovells US LLP, where his
practice focused largely on consumer finance, lender liability, and other complex financial services litigation in state and
federal trial and
appellate courts.
She also has arbitration, discovery, and significant motions
practice experience in both state and
federal trial and
appellate courts.
Mr. Lee's
appellate practice includes appeals in the United States Supreme Court, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth, Ninth, Eleventh and
Federal Circuits, the Supreme Court of California, the Supreme Court of Florida, the New York Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Tennessee Supreme Court, the Supreme Court of Virginia, California Courts of Appeal, Florida District Courts of Appeal, Indiana Court of Appeals, Maryland Court of Special Appeals, New York Supreme Court (
Appellate Division), Superior Court of Pennsylvania, and Tennessee Court of Appeals.
Admitted to
practice law in both California state and
federal courts, he has successfully prosecuted numerous trials and arbitrations and argued before both state and
federal appellate courts.
Elizabeth Carver focuses her
practice on
appellate litigation in
federal and state courts.
Ms. Blitz is experienced in all aspects of California and
federal civil procedure, including filing and responding to complaints, conducting discovery, motion
practice, alternative dispute resolution proceedings, judgment enforcement and
appellate practice.
In addition to his trial
practice, Don has extensive experience in
appellate litigation, including appearances before the United States Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Federal Circuit, and many other state and federal
Federal Circuit, and many other state and
federal federal courts.
Doug's
practice includes
federal and state trial
practice,
federal and state
appellate practice, and state administrative
practice.
Jansen Voss has developed a diverse defense litigation and
appellate practice in both state and
federal courts in Alabama and Mississippi.
Our trial and
appellate attorneys are admitted to
practice in
federal and state courts in Utah,
federal and state courts in several other states, various United States Circuit Courts of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.
Richard S. Rosen is active in trial and
appellate practice in the state and
federal courts.
Over her 23 years in
practice, Ms. Genesen has handled trial and
appellate work in both state and
federal courts, including an array of complex multi-district
federal court litigation, and has appeared throughout the country before state and
federal regulatory bodies on behalf of clients in the airline, energy, software, healthcare and alcoholic beverage industries.
In doing so, I offer a comprehensive defense
practice that encompasses both state and
federal courts from the municipal level to the
appellate level.
Haverstick's litigation
practice focuses primarily on representing government officials and entities in the Supreme and Commonwealth Courts of Pennsylvania, as well as other state and
federal appellate courts, in matters ranging from public corruption investigations to the Right - to - Know Law to the constitutionality of state laws.
Richard S. Rosen, the Past President of the South Carolina Bar, is active in trial and
appellate practice in the state and
federal courts.
Frank Stanley
practices in
federal and Michigan trial and
appellate courts.
In the course of his litigation
practice, Gary has represented individuals, stockholders, and private and public corporations before
federal and state trial courts,
appellate courts, arbitration panels, and alternative dispute forums throughout Massachusetts and New England.
For forty years, our firm has maintained an extraordinary reputation in civil litigation and
appellate practice, enjoying significant courtroom success in state and
federal courts.
So far, only three published studies have analyzed the association between brief readability and case outcome, 50 and no studies have analyzed that association in the trial courts, where most lawyers
practice.51 Long and Christensen sampled 882
appellate briefs from the Supreme Court,
federal appellate courts, and state supreme courts.52 Their dependent variable was the outcome of the appeal (affirmed or reversed), while their independent variable was readability measured by the Flesch Reading Ease score as calculated by Microsoft Word.53 For
federal appellate and state supreme court briefs, the researchers coded control variables for
federal or state court, standard of review, presence of a dissenting opinion, and readability of the opinion deciding the appeal.54 For United States Supreme Court briefs, the researchers coded control variables for constitutional issue, criminal or civil case, presence of a dissenting opinion, and opinion readability.55 They found no statistically significant correlation between readability and outcome in the briefs in their study.56
The Lash & Goldberg LLP consumer litigation defense
practice group closely monitors trends and developments in the consumer litigation defense area including state and
federal trial and appellate court decisions, as well as pronouncements by the Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Comm
federal trial and
appellate court decisions, as well as pronouncements by the
Federal Trade Commission and the Federal Communications Comm
Federal Trade Commission and the
Federal Communications Comm
Federal Communications Commission.
She began her legal career as a law clerk for two
appellate judges (one state, one
federal) and then worked for a small D.C. law firm with a national
practice before moving to Spokane, Washington to work as a
federal public defender.
Key focuses his
practice on IP litigation, including patents, trademarks and copyrights, in which he has represented both plaintiffs and defendants before numerous
federal district and appellate courts, including the Courts of Appeal for the First, Fourth and Federal Circuits, and the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as the
federal district and
appellate courts, including the Courts of Appeal for the First, Fourth and
Federal Circuits, and the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as the
Federal Circuits, and the U.S. Supreme Court, as well as the USPTO.
London Amburn's
Appellate Practice Group handles appeals and other post-judgment proceedings in the Tennessee and Kentucky
appellate courts and in the
Federal 6th Circuit.
He's also the author of a chapter on technology for
appellate lawyers, published in the Law Journal Press
Appellate Practice in
Federal & State Courts guide.