The Vavilov Institute issued a statement after today's ruling saying it would pursue a final appeal to
the federal arbitration court over the 90 hectares of plots concerned, but campaigners have expressed little hope of victory.
Not exact matches
Subject to the
arbitration provisions above, and other than small claims actions as permitted therein, any action or proceeding arising from, relating to or in connection with these Terms of Service will be brought exclusively in the
federal or state
courts located in New York, New York, and you irrevocably consent to the personal jurisdiction of such
courts and agree that it is a convenient forum and that you will not seek to transfer such action or proceeding to any other forum or jurisdiction, under the doctrine of forum non conveniens or otherwise.
The Arbitrator, and not any
federal, state or local
court or agency, shall have the exclusive authority to resolve any dispute arising under or relating to the validity, interpretation, applicability, enforceability or formation of these Terms of Service and / or these
arbitration provisions in Section 26 hereof, including but not limited to any claim that all or any part of these Terms of Service is void or voidable;
Lawyers for Ailes and Carlson appeared in
court in New Jersey as a
federal judge sought to plot the course of the lawsuit in the wake of «rapid fire» motions from the parties, include Carlson's motion to block Ailes» attorneys» request for
arbitration.
He said their attempts to move the case from the state
court in Los Angeles where Daniels filed her claim to a
federal court is because it would increase the chances that the matter will be decided in private
arbitration, «thus hiding the truth from the public.»
After its scandal in which it created up to 2 million fraudulent accounts, Wells Fargo (WFC) asked a
Federal District
Court to order customers to private
arbitration instead of the class - action suit they were pursuing.
-RRB- asked a
Federal District
Court to order customers to private
arbitration instead of the class - action suit they were pursuing.
He said their attempts to move the case from the state
court in Los Angeles where Daniels filed her claim to a
federal court is because that would increase the chances the matter be decided in private
arbitration, «thus hiding the truth from the public.»
Instead, the Supreme
Court has made clear that
federal agencies, acting under the authority granted to them by Congress, can regulate
arbitration procedures to protect statutory rights.
Trump and Cohen has since moved the suit to
federal court and want a judge to push the matter into private
arbitration.
«They are not attempting to remove this case to
federal court in order to increase their changes that the matter will be decided in private
arbitration,» he wrote.
10.1 Any dispute relating in any way to your visit to a Nestlé Waters North America Inc. website or to products or services you purchase through a Nestlé Waters North America Inc. website shall be submitted to confidential
arbitration in Stamford, Connecticut, except that, to the extent you have in any manner violated or threatened to violate Nestlé Waters North America Inc.'s intellectual property rights, Nestlé Waters North America Inc. may seek injunctive or other appropriate relief in any state or
federal court in the state of Connecticut, and you consent to exclusive jurisdiction and venue in such
courts.
For any matters which are not subject to
arbitration as set forth in these Official Rules and / or in connection with the entering of any judgment on an
arbitration award in connection with these Official Rules and / or the Contest, the parties irrevocably submit and consent to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the state and
federal courts located in or closest to the County of New York in the State of New York.
In the event that this
arbitration agreement is for any reason held to be unenforceable, any litigation against the Company (except for small - claims
court actions) may be commenced only in the
federal or state
courts located in New York County, New York.
With respect to any disputes or claims not subject to
arbitration (as set forth below), you agree to exclusive jurisdiction in the state and
federal courts in Los Angeles, California.
(2) certain forms of alternative dispute resolution, including mediation, early neutral evaluation, minitrials, and voluntary
arbitration, may have potential to reduce the large backlog of cases now pending in some
Federal courts throughout the United States, thereby allowing the
courts to process their remaining cases more efficiently; and
Sole and exclusive jurisdiction for any action or proceeding arising out of or related to this Agreement, including application and / or interpretation of the
arbitration provision, or CRA's services shall be an appropriate state of
federal court located in Laramie County in the state of Wyoming.
Without limiting your right to file
arbitration claims against Capital One Investing under FINRA Rule 12200 or its affiliates or successors, you consent to the personal jurisdiction and venue of the
federal and state
courts in King County, Washington for any
court action or proceeding relating to your Account and you agree that all such claims by you against us or our affiliates or successors will be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the
federal and state
courts in King County, State of Washington.
Restricting schools that participate in the
federal student loan program from using abusive
arbitration clauses (also known as «rip - off clauses») and class action bans to silence students» complaints, force students to «go it alone» with any claims they have against their school, and keep students» fraud claims against schools out of
court;
Notwithstanding any provision of this
arbitration provision or the rules and procedures of the
arbitration administrator, the Bank will be responsible for payment and / or reimbursement of any
arbitration fees to the extent that such fees exceed the amount of the filing fees you would have incurred if your Claim had been brought in the state or
federal court nearest your residence with jurisdiction over the Claims.
For any action at law or in equity relating to the
arbitration provision of these Terms of Use, you agree to resolve any dispute you have with Blue Buffalo exclusively in a state or
federal court located in Connecticut, and to submit to the personal jurisdiction of the
courts located in Connecticut for the purpose of litigating all such disputes.
This blawg provides timely, educational, and thought - provoking information on the latest news and class action developments from
federal and state
courts — and on class action
arbitrations — in the Southeast and across the country.
The implementation of a new rule prohibiting
federal funds for nursing homes that enter binding
arbitration agreements with residents has been blocked by a U.S. district
court judge, who found...
An
arbitration clause with a 30 - day opt - out was upheld by a
federal court in Florida, with the
court citing the opt - out as one reason why it could be upheld.
With an active trial practice, Carter has litigated in both state and
federal courts as well as before the American
Arbitration Association (AAA) and international
arbitration tribunals, such as the ICC.
I have represented employees in state and
federal cases, in the Nebraska Workers Compensation
Court, administrative proceedings in front of the Nebraska Department of Labor and Nebraska Equal Opportunity Commission and have also represented union members in
arbitrations.
We have represented plaintiffs and defendants in more than 100 trials and legal proceedings in all forums — state,
federal and foreign
courts;
arbitration and mediation inside and outside the United States; and administrative proceedings before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), the USPTO and international patent offices.
Attorneys that practice this form of law represent individuals or parties in hearings,
arbitration, mediation, and trials, before administrative agencies, and local, state, and
federal courts.
The
court explained that the
Federal Arbitration Act requires that
arbitration contracts are considered «valid, irrevocable, and enforceable,» absent an exception.
Our dedicated lawyers handle a wide range of complex matters in state and
federal court, before agencies, administrative bodies, and
arbitration tribunals.
Mr. Stellabotte is a registered patent attorney and has extensive experience litigating patent, copyright, trade secret, antitrust, contract, tort, trademark, false advertising, and information technology related matters in
federal and state trial and appellate
courts, including case preparation and strategy, fact and expert discovery, depositions, motion practice, Markman hearings, preliminary injunction hearings, bench and jury trials,
arbitrations, mediations, appeals, and settlement negotiations.
We have successfully represented clients in both state and
federal court, as well as in
arbitration, winning construction cases where millions of dollars were at stake.
He works in Lash & Goldberg LLP's Fort Lauderdale office and assists in representing regional and national companies and business owners, including Fortune 500 companies, hospitals and health care providers, telecommunications service providers, and professionals in state and
federal courts and
arbitration proceedings.
Similarly, though noting that United States
Federal Arbitration Act has established a general «presumption that an arbitral body has acted within its powers», the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit clarified that it would «review de novo a contention that the subject matter of the
arbitration lies outside the scope of a contract.»
The Houston and Dallas attorneys at Deans & Lyons, LLP have handled lawsuits involving claims of misappropriation of trade secrets in
federal and state
courts as well as before
arbitration panels.
His practice focuses primarily on commercial litigation matters, including representing clients in state and
federal courts and in
arbitration.
Mark Edgarton has represented some of the country's leading technology companies in a wide - range of intellectual property and complex commercial matters in
federal and state
courts across the country and in international
arbitration proceedings.
Mr. Post brings to AGMB 13 years of experience handling complex commercial litigation and dispute resolution for large corporations in
federal and state
courts and in
arbitration.
Mr. Donaldson's practice involves a broad range of commercial litigation matters, including representing clients in state and
federal courts, including jury trials, as well as mediation and
arbitration, and appeals.
Ms. Riksheim began her legal career at a private law firm in New Orleans, Louisiana, where she represented sureties and contractors in state and
federal courts, as well as in
arbitrations, mediations, and administrative hearings.
ADLI Law Group's trademark litigation lawyer services and enforcement counseling is multi-faceted, including cease - and desist letters, acquisitions and licensing agreements, trademark cancellation and opposition proceedings, domain name
arbitrations, seizures, and litigation before state and
federal courts as well as the United States Patent and Trademark Office and International Trade Commission.
The
court considered that «while an arbitrator may not award relief expressly forbidden by the [
arbitration agreement], an arbitrator may award relief not sought by either party, so long as the relief lies within the broad discretion conferred by the [United States
Federal Arbitration Act].»
We represents businesses before state and
federal courts, juries and judges, arbitration panels and state and federal administrative agencies, and United States Courts of Appeals, state appellate courts and administrative appeals b
courts, juries and judges,
arbitration panels and state and
federal administrative agencies, and United States
Courts of Appeals, state appellate courts and administrative appeals b
Courts of Appeals, state appellate
courts and administrative appeals b
courts and administrative appeals boards.
Won
arbitration against former employee of biotechnology client for breach of confidentiality and non-disparagement clauses of settlement agreement, and obtained preliminary and permanent injunctions for the violations in
federal district
court (2016 U.S. Dist.
Mr. Cooper's experience includes over three decades of extensive trial practice in state and
federal courts, before administrative agencies and licensing boards and in
arbitration in the areas of complex civil disputes and criminal defense.
Represented wholesale utility provider in
federal court dispute enforcing
arbitration agreement against wind energy producer.
Russell has more than twenty - five years of experience as a complex business and intellectual property litigator, representing corporate and individual clients throughout the country in
federal and state trial and appellate
courts,
arbitrations, and mediations.
He has represented clients in
federal and state trial
courts, the International Trade Commission,
federal courts of appeal, and
arbitration.
He has represented parties in actions throughout New England and in
federal courts in several states, as well as in
arbitration proceedings.
The incoming partners will focus on IP litigation in
federal courts, state
courts, the International Trade Commission (ITC), and
arbitration proceedings, with an emphasis on patent and trademark litigation for West Coast and Asia - based technology clients.